全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

南京机场两次降雪天气过程对比分析
Comparative Analysis of Two Snowfall Weather Processes at Nanjing Airport

DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2022.116104, PP. 1000-1008

Keywords: 南京机场,降雪,对比分析
Nanjing Airport
, Snowfall, Comparative Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2022年年初发生在苏皖南部地区两次不同量级的降雪天气,分别对南京机场运行产生了不同影响,利用相关气象资料及WRF模式,对这两种天气形势和物理量场进行对比分析。结果表明:暴雪产生在低空急流的左前方和700 hPa切变线的风速辐合区中,水汽通量散度的辐合区和上升运动场的合理配置是暴雪产生的重要原因。通过对比分析物理量场,得出南京机场大雪短期预报的着眼点:700 hPa温度0℃线基本上都要南压到31?N或以南地区,850 hPa温度0℃要南压到30?N以南,地面温度 ≤ 0℃,925~800 hPa温度 ≤ ?3℃或?4℃,700 hPa温度 < 0℃,800~700 hPa存在逆温;可以通过对近地面大气层中冻结部分降水混合比在可凝结成降水水汽混合比中的比例 ≥ 0.80作为判断雨雪分界线的参考。
In early 2022, two snowfalls of different magnitudes occurred in southern Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, which had different impacts on the operation of Nanjing Airport. Using meteorological data and WRF mode, this paper focused on the comparison and analysis of the weather condition and the physical quantity fields of two different situations. The results show that the snowstorm occurs in the front left of the low-level jet stream and in the wind speed convergence area of the 700 hPa shear line. And the reasonable configuration of the convergence area of the water vapor flux divergence and the rising motion field can be regarded as an important reason for the occurrence of the snowstorm. Through the comparative analysis of these two snowfalls of different magnitudes, the focus of the short-term forecast of heavy snowfall at Nanjing Airport is preliminarily drawn: the 700 hPa temperature 0?C line should basically be pressed southward to the south of 31?N, and the 850 hPa temperature 0?C should be southerly pressed to the south of 30?N, surface temperature ≤ 0?C, 925~800 hPa temperature ≤ ?3?C or ?4?C, 700 hPa temperature < 0?C, and there is a temperature inversion in 800~700 hPa. Ratio of mixing ratio of frozen precipitation in the near-surface atmosphere to the mixing ratio of water vapor that can condense into precipitation is very important, which can be used to determine the evolution of rain and snow boundaries.

References

[1]  梁秋枫, 郭秀凤, 苏蕾. 从一次强雷雨气象保障看如何提高MDRS气象支持[J]. 民航管理, 2020(5): 52-53.
[2]  肖蕾, 唐海, 张云秋, 谢和林. 遵义市冬末初春两次寒潮降雪天气过程对比分析[J]. 贵州气象, 2018, 42(3): 73-79.
[3]  吕翔, 王珂玮, 张庆池, 等. 江苏省一次强降雪天气成因及冷空气作用分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(S2): 194-199, 284.
[4]  Zhou, H.-L. and Chen, M. (2012) Diagnostic Analysis of a Snowfall Weather in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei in 2010. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 3, 32-35+40.
[5]  胡玉玲, 谢义明, 汪婵娟, 孙忠德, 杨柳. 淮河以南一次罕见暴雪天气的成因以及数值预报产品的诊断分析[C]//中国气象学会. 中国气象学会2008年年会极端天气气候事件与应急气象服务分会场论文集. 2008: 521-527.
[6]  郑婧, 许爱华, 刘波, 许彬. 江西省冬季大雪气候概况和环流特征分析[J]. 气象与减灾研究, 2009, 32(1): 32-38.
[7]  李正金, 李菁, 刘冬晴, 束宇. 南京2018年1月两次强降雪过程的对比分析[C]//中国气象学会. 第35届中国气象学会年会S1灾害天气监测、分析与预报. 2018: 947-953.
[8]  廖镜彪, 王雪梅, 夏北成, 等. WRF模式中微物理和积云参数化方案的对比试验[J]. 热带气象学报, 2012(4): 461-470.
[9]  崔锦, 周晓珊, 阎琦, 张爱忠, 李得勤, 宋国云, 陈雨. WRF模式不同微物理过程对东北降水相态预报的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(5): 1-6.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133