Research and development of efficient, economical and resource-based flue gas desulfurization technology has always been a hot spot in the field of air pollution control. Molecular sieve materials have been paid attention to by SO2 adsorbent researchers due to their huge specific surface area. In this paper, 13X zeolite was modified with Cu(NO3) 2·3H2O to obtain 13x-Xwt %CuO (calculated by the amount of CuO loaded). The adsorption time and capacity of SO2 penetration sorbent and the isothermal curve of N2 adsorption-desorption were studied. The results are as follows: 13X-3wt%CuO has the best adsorption effect, the penetration adsorption time is 110 min, the penetration adsorption capacity is 43.41 mg·g-1, the saturation adsorption capacity is 49.27 mg·g-1; The amount of CuO loading has a great influence on the adsorption effect of modified 13X molecular sieve on SO2. SEM and BET characterization showed that CuO modification did not change the external morphology of 13X molecular sieve, changed the pore size, but did not block the original channel of the molecular sieve, before and after modification belong to the type I adsorption isothermal curve. The pore size distribution and type of molecular sieve, as well as the content and type of alkali metal cations jointly control the adsorption process of SO2 by 13X-xwt %CuO. XPS characterization showed that Cu(NO3) 2 decomposed into CuO and Cu2O during roasting at 450°C, CuO/Cu2O ≈ 1.5. The R2 values of the quasi-second-order kinetic models obtained from the 13X-Xwt %CuO particle diffusion kinetic models were all above 0.99, indicating that the quasi-second-order kinetic equations were more relevant. Particle diffusion dynamics model in fitting results show that the adsorption process can be divided into two stages, the first phase of surface adsorption and diffusion rate in the granules common control process, more accurate dynamics model of the secondary in the second phase particle diffusion rate control stage, mainly for the micropore adsorption or chemical adsorption, quasi level 2 dynamic model conformity of variation; C is a constant not equal to 0, indicating that the adsorption of SO2 is not completely through the form of intra-particle diffusion, and a small amount of chemisorption exists. And it is the compound effect of multiple adsorption mechanisms.
References
[1]
Feng, Y.C., Yu, Q.J., Yi, H.H., et al. (2020) Research Progress of MFI-Type Zeolites in the Field of VOCs Removal. Materials Reports, 34, 17089-17098.
[2]
Huang, X.X., Chen, L., Li, H., et al. (2020) Research Progress of Activated Carbon Fiber in Flue Gas Desulfurization and Denitrification. Hongshui River, 39, 35-38.
[3]
Wang, C.-R. (2010) Study on Performance and Application of Zeolite Molecular Sieve. Chemistry and Adhesion, 32, 76-78.
[4]
Soontornworajit, B., Wannatong, L., Hiamtup, P., et al. (2007) Induced Interaction between Polypyrrole and SO2 via Molecular Sieve 13X. Materials Science & Engineering B, 136, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2006.09.016
[5]
Zhang, Y., Chen, Z.H., Liu, X., et al. (2020) Efficient SO2 Removal Using a Microporous Metal-Organic Framework with Molecular Sieving Effect. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59, 874-882. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06040
[6]
Taghdisian, H., Tasharrofi, S., Firoozjaie, A.G., et al. (2019) Loading-Dependent Diffusion of SO2 in 13X and 5A Using Molecular Dynamics: Effects of Extraframework Ions and Topology. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 64, 3092-3104. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00204
[7]
Dai, Y.R., Yin, L.F., Wang, S.Y., et al. (2020) Shape-Selective Adsorption Mechanism of CS-Z1 Microporous Molecular Sieve for Organic Pollutants. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 392, Article ID: 122314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122314
[8]
Li, X.S., Zhang, L.Q., Zheng, Y., et al. (2015) SO2 Absorption Performance Enhancement by Ionic Liquid Supported on Mesoporous Molecular Sieve. Energy & Fuels, 29, 942-953. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef5022285
[9]
Yang, Y.H., Liu, M., Song, C.-S., et al. (2008) Pereformance of Adsorptive Desulfurization over Modified Y Zeolites. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 4, 383-387.
[10]
Yang, K., Su, B.H., Shi, L., et al. (2018) Adsorption Mechanism and Regeneration Performance of 13X for H2S and SO2. Energy Fuels, 32, 12742-12749. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02978
[11]
Georgiadis, A.G., Charisiou, N.D., Gaber, S., et al. (2021) Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide at Low Temperatures Using an Industrial Molecular Sieve: An Experimental and Theoretical Study. ACS Omega, 6, 14774-14787. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06157
[12]
Thinakaran, N., Baskaralingam, P., Pulikesi, M., et al. (2008) Removal of Acid Violet 17 from Aqueous Solutions by Adsorption onto Activated Carbon Prepared from Sunflower Seed Hull. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151, 316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.076
[13]
Ho, Y.S. and Mckay, G. (1999) Pseudo-Second Order Model for Sorption Processes. Process Biochemistry, 34, 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
[14]
Chin, W.F., Ling, T.R., Shin, J.R., et al. (2009) Initial Behavior of Intraparticle Diffusion Model Used in the Description of Adsorption Kinetics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 153, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.04.042
