全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Finance  2022 

资本市场开放与民营企业融资约束——基于深港通的实证研究
Capital Market Opening and Private Enterprise Financing Constraints—An Emrirical Study Based on “Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connet”

DOI: 10.12677/FIN.2022.126065, PP. 601-615

Keywords: 资本市场开放,民营企业融资约束,经典双重差分模型,外部治理
Capital Market Opening
, Private Enterprise Financing Constraints, Classic DID, External Governance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2016年12月5日,“深港通”的启动建立了深圳与香港两市间资本的联通机制。相较于国有企业,我国民营企业由于其自身特征往往外部融资渠道有限,企业与外部信息不对称程度较高、委托代理成本较高,所面临的融资约束困境较为严峻。现有大量文献已经证明资本市场开放能够通过增加市场资金供给、加强公司治理的外部监督、改善信息环境、促进金融市场发展等路径缓解企业面临的外部融资约束问题。但实际上,从“深港通”实施至今,仍处于初期运行阶段,数据新颖,资料相对匮乏。基于上述背景,本文以“深港通”启动作为资本市场开放的代理变量,选取我国深圳证券交易所2015~2018年间民营上市公司数据,通过刻画KZ指数来衡量民营企业外部融资约束程度,运用经典双重差分模型,实证检验深港通机制对我国民营企业融资约束的影响;并进一步考察在不同公司规模、不同审计质量条件下,民营企业间融资约束缓解程度是否存在显著差异。最后本文进行了稳健性检验,从PSM匹配对照组样本、变换模型、以SA指数度量企业融资约束三个角度验证结论的可靠性。
On December 5, 2016, the launch of the “Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect” established the capital connection mechanism between Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Compared with state-owned enterprises, Chinese private enterprises, due to their own characteristics, often have limited external financing channels, enterprises and external information asymmetry is higher, the principal-agent cost is higher, the financing constraints of the dilemma is more severe. A large number of existing literatures have proved that the opening of the capital market can alleviate the external financing constraints faced by enterprises through increasing the supply of market funds, strengthening the external supervision of corporate governance, improving the information environment and promoting the development of financial markets. But in fact, since the implementation of Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect, it is still in the initial stage of operation, with novel data and relatively scarce data. Based on the above background, this paper takes the launch of “Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect” as the proxy variable of the opening of the capital market, selects the data of private listed companies in Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2018, and measures the degree of external financing constraints of private enterprises by describing the KZ index. To empirically examine the influence of Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect mechanism on financing constraints of Chinese private enterprises; and further investigate whether there are significant differences in the degree of financing constraint alleviation among private enterprises under different company sizes and audit quality conditions. Finally, the robustness test was carried out to verify the reliability of the conclusions from three perspectives: PSM matching control sample, transformation model, and SA index measuring corporate financing constraints.

References

[1]  Fazzari, S.M., Hubbard, R.G. and Petersen, B.C. (1988) Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 19, 141-206.
https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2534426
[2]  蔡苓. 破解我国中小企业融资难问题研究——基于商业银行“投贷联动”视角的分析[J]. 上海经济研究, 2016(3): 83-95.
[3]  陈学胜, 张建波, 董文龙. 资本市场开放降低了企业融资约束吗?——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2012(11): 32-38.
[4]  Bekaert, G. and Harvey, C.R. (2000) Foreign Speculators and Emerging Equity Markets. The Journal of Finance, 55, 565-613.
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/0022-1082.00220
[5]  Iwata, S. and Wu, S. (2009) Stock Market Liberalization and International Risk Sharing. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 19, 461-476.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.intfin.2008.05.003
[6]  Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R. and Lundblad, C. (2011) Financial Openness and Productivity. World Development, 39, 1-19.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.06.016
[7]  Funke, M.N. (2002) Stock Market Developments and Private Consumer Spending in Emerging Markets. IMF Working Paper, wp02238.
https://doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.880945
[8]  李巍. 资本账户开放、金融发展和经济金融不稳定的国际经验分析[J]. 世界经济, 2008(3): 34-43.
[9]  Bae, K.H., Bailey, W. and Mao, C.X. (2006) Stock Market Liberalization and the Information Environment. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 404-428.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2006.01.004
[10]  Ghosh, C., Harding, J. and Phani, B.V. (2008) Does Liberalization Reduce Agency Costs? Evidence from the Indian Banking Sector. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 405-419.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.07.004
[11]  连立帅, 朱松, 陈关亭. 资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资——基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(8): 136-154.
[12]  覃琳, 陆正飞. 资本市场开放能提高股价信息含量吗?——基于“沪港通”效应的实证检验[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(1): 169-179.
[13]  刘海飞, 柏巍, 李冬昕, 许金涛. 沪港通交易制度能提升中国股票市场稳定性吗?——基于复杂网络的视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(1): 97-110.
[14]  钟凯, 孙昌玲, 王永妍, 王化成. 资本市场对外开放与股价异质性波动——来自“沪港通”的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018(7): 174-192.
[15]  邹洋, 张瑞君, 孟庆斌, 侯德帅. 资本市场开放能抑制上市公司违规吗?——来自“沪港通”的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(8): 120-134.
[16]  代凯, 邱倩. 利率市场化改革对企业融资约束的影响研究——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融监管研究, 2019(6): 70-84.
[17]  胡丽红. 利率市场化对实体经济融资成本的影响[J]. 求索, 2015(8): 75-79.
[18]  Foley-Fisher, N., Ramcharan, R. and Yu, E. (2016) The Impact of Unconventional Monetary Policy on Firm Financing Constraints: Ev-idence from the Maturity Extension Program. Journal of Financial Economics, 122, 409-429.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.07.002
[19]  吴卫星, 刘细宪. 政府与社会资本合作能改善企业融资约束吗?——来自中国上市公司的微观证据[J]. 证券市场导报, 2019(5): 41-47.
[20]  黄炳艺, 吕玉洁, Ben Sopranzetti. 银行往来关系与企业融资约束——基于中国民营上市公司的经验证据[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2): 70-81.
[21]  Shi, Z.Y. and Zhang, B. (2005) An Analysis of the Loan Exit Gaming on Relationship Lending in China. Chinese Business Review, No. 28, 1537-1506.
[22]  Fohlin, C. (1998) Relationship Banking, Liquidity, and Investment in the German Industrialization. Journal of Finance, 53, 1737-1758.
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/0022-1082.00070
[23]  胡刘芬, 周泽将. 风险投资机构持股能够缓解企业后续融资约束吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2018, 40(7): 91-109.
[24]  顾奋玲, 解角羊. 内部控制缺陷、审计师意见与企业融资约束——基于中国A 股主板上市公司的经验数据[J]. 会计研究, 2018(12): 77-84.
[25]  肖涵, 刘芳. 资本账户开放政策对公司融资行为的影响——基于沪港通政策的实证研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2019, 36(3): 58-65.
[26]  蒋琰, 陆正飞. 公司治理与股权融资成本——单一与综合机制的治理效应研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2009, 26(2): 60-75.
[27]  郭阳生, 沈烈, 郭枚香. 沪港通改善了上市公司信息环境吗?——基于分析师关注度的视角[J]. 证券市场导报, 2018(10): 35-43+50.
[28]  师倩, 姚秋歌. 沪港通与公司融资约束——基于双重差分模型的实证研究[J]. 财务研究, 2018(2): 62-72.
[29]  孔宁宁, 闫希. 交叉上市与公司成长——来自中国“A+H”股的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2009(7): 134-145.
[30]  陈国进, 王磊. 境外上市对融资约束的影响——基于H股公司的经验证据[J]. 当代财经, 2007(9): 47-51.
[31]  靳庆鲁, 孔祥, 侯青川. 货币政策、民营企业投资效率与公司期权价值[J]. 经济研究, 2012, 47(5): 96-106.
[32]  白俊, 连立帅. 信贷资金配置差异: 所有制歧视抑或禀赋差异?[J]. 管理世界, 2012(6): 30-42+73.
[33]  鲁丹, 肖华荣. 银行市场竞争结构、信息生产和中小企业融资[J]. 金融研究, 2008(5): 107-113.
[34]  李增泉, 辛显刚, 于旭辉. 金融发展、债务融资约束与金字塔结构——来自民营企业集团的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2008(1): 123-135+188.
[35]  袁其刚, 张伟, 付晓晨. 金融中介发展对出口增长二元边际影响的实证分析——基于中国制造业数据[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2013, 29(3): 121-127.
[36]  张天阳, 李丹. 中国民营上市公司信息披露与公司治理[J]. 特区经济, 2008(1): 107-108.
[37]  雷光勇, 范蕾. 市场化程度、内部人侵占与审计监督[J]. 财贸经济, 2009(5): 61-67.
[38]  Bushman, R.M. and Smith, A.J. (2001) Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 237-333.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1
[39]  Kaplan, S.N. and Zingales, L. (1997) Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169-215.
https://doi.org/ 10.1162/003355397555163
[40]  Cleary, S. (1999) The Relationship between Firm Investment and Financial Status. Journal of Finance, 54, 673-692.
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/0022-1082.00121
[41]  何瑛, 于文蕾, 杨棉之. CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(9): 155-173.
[42]  Hadlock, C.J. and Pierce, J.R. (2010) New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving beyond the KZ Index. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1909-1940.
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/rfs/hhq009

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133