全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

初中数学教材课后习题与课标要求对比研究——以人、苏、北师大三版本“函数”为例
A Comparative Study of After-Class Exercises in Junior Middle School Mathematics Textbooks and Curriculum Standards—Taking the Three Versions of “Functions” of Ren, Su and Beijing Normal University as Examples

DOI: 10.12677/AE.2022.1211695, PP. 4541-4550

Keywords: 三版本数学教材,初中数学教材课后习题,课标要求,函数
Three-Edition Mathematics Teaching Materials
, Junior High School Mathematics Teaching Material Exercises after Class, Curriculum Standard Requirements, Function

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

初中教材课后习题的编写与课程标准要求是否保持一致是实现数学课程标准的关键。本研究基于韦伯模式、SEC模式评价框架及课标要求,对我国目前广泛应用的三版本初中数学教材课后习题从整体性、层次性、开放性、背景化、探究性五方面与课标要求进行对比研究,在三个版本中发现北师大版更贴近课标要求,而人教版与苏教版与课标要求贴合度不高。从而向教材编写者提出重视习题编写应符合课标要求、习题编写应体现知识的整体性、增加开放型习题、注意习题分层的侧重点、丰富习题背景、适当提高探究题比例等建议。
It is the key to realize the mathematics curriculum standard whether the compilation of exercises in junior middle school textbooks after class is consistent with the curriculum standard requirements. This study based on weber, the SEC evaluation framework and the curriculum requirements, analyzes the three versions of the widely used in junior middle school mathematics teaching material homework problems from integrity, hierarchy, openness, background, exploring the five aspects, and comparative study on the curriculum requirements, found in three versions, Beijing normal university version closer to the curriculum requirements, and the people teaching version and the Su teaching version and the curriculum standard requirements are not high. Thus to the textbook writer put forward to pay attention to the exercise writing should meet the requirements of the curriculum standard, exercise writing should reflect the integrity of knowledge, increase the open exercises, pay attention to the focus of exercise layers, rich exercise background, appropriate-ly improve the proportion of inquiry questions and other suggestions.

References

[1]  中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育数学课程标准: 2022 年版[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2011: 59+72-73.
[2]  顾明远. 教育大辞典(增订合编本) [M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 1998: 893-894.
[3]  杨曦. 高中数学教材习题与课程标准的一致性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2015: 8-9.
[4]  伊西凡, 孙佳宁, 朱立明. 高考数学全国Ⅰ卷与课程标准的一致性研究——以2007-2019年为例[J]. 数学教育学报, 2020, 29(6): 7-13.
[5]  秦振. 初中数学开放探究题的类型及解题策略[J]. 中国数学教育, 2019(5): 60-64.
[6]  张宇鑫. 中考数学探究题解析及类型分析[J]. 教学月刊?中学版(教学参考), 2016(5): 59-61.
[7]  Fulmer, G.W. (2011) Estimating Critical Values for Strength of Alignment Among Curriculum, Assessments, and Instruction. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistical, 36, 381-402.
https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998610381397
[8]  周莹, 廖丽红, 梁鑫, 黄怀芳. 初中数学教材与课程标准的一致性研究——以“人教版”和“湘教版”中的函数习题为例[J]. 数学通报, 2017, 56(5): 6-9+14.
[9]  张俊忠. 数学开放题的起源、价值与运用[J]. 教学与管理, 2020(31): 43-45.
[10]  王建波. 三个版本初中数学教材统计习题比较研究[J]. 数学通报, 2014, 53(4): 14-18+23.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133