Factors Affecting the Uptake of E-Government Services on the Government Services Bus (GSB) in Developing Countries. A Case Study of Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources in Zambia
E-Governance addresses many challenges of traditional
governance, among them high operational costs, quality and efficiency. The
purpose of this study was to firstly identify the major factors affecting the
uptake of e-government services on the government services bus (GSB) using the
ministry of lands and natural resources as a case study. The second objective
of the study was to develop a framework for
E-government services based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use
of Technology (UTAUT) model. The research adopted the Unified theory of Acceptance
and use of technology (UTAUT) model to guide the study. The sample size was 384
of the members of the public who walked into
the service centre at Mulungushi house for the counter services, 345 questionnaires were successfully
returned. This represented a 90 percent response rate. The data
collected was analyzed using descriptive analysis and inferential statistics
(Pearson Correlation Coefficient). Pearson Correlation Coefficient was used to
determine the relationships between the variables. The hypotheses were accepted
as they showed p-values less than 0.005. It
thus established that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social
influence and facilitating conditions have an effect on the intention of use
and actual use of e-government services. The research further
recommended the need for increased awareness of availability of e-government services on the service bus as well as the provision of
facilities to access the e-services.
References
[1]
Al Salmi, M. A., & Hasnan, N. (2016). E-Government Analysis: Sultanate of Oman Case. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2016.43006
[2]
Chilembo, Z., & Tembo, S. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges of Coordinating the Implementation of e-Government Programmes in Zambia. International Journal of Information Science, 10, 29-43.
[3]
Chipeta, J. (2018). A Review of E-Government Development in Africa. A Case of Zambia. Journal of e-Government Studies and Best Practices, 2018, Article ID: 973845.
[4]
Dhaoui, I. (2019). Electronic Governance: An Overview of Opportunities and Challenges. MPRA Paper No. 92545.
[5]
Glass, L. M., & Newig, J. (2019). Governance for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How Important Are Participation, Policy Coherence, Reflexivity, Adaptation and Democratic Institutions? Earth System Governance, 2, Article ID: 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031
[6]
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
[7]
Marikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2021). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed.), TheoryHUB Book.
[8]
Sarfarazi, J. (2017). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model-Mobile Banking. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 22, 1-20.
[9]
Sikaonga, S., & Tembo, S. (2020). E-Government Readiness in the Civil Service: A Case of Zambian Ministries. International Journal of Information Science, 10, 15-28.
[10]
Soneka, P. N., & Phiri, J. (2019). A Model for Improving E-Tax Systems Adoption in Rural Zambia Based on the TAM Model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 7, 908-918. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.72062
[11]
Tembo, E., & Sagashya, D. (2021). Zambia: Private Sector Investment in Security of Land Tenure. From Piloting Using Technology to National Rollout. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 5, 31-49.
[12]
Undi-Phiri, B., & Phiri, J. (2022). Assessing Factors Affecting the Adoption of E- Government Services in Developing Countries for Transport Sector, amidst the Covid- 19 Pandemic. Scientific Research, 14, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.4236/cn.2022.142006
[13]
Venkatesh, M. M., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540