全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Multi Structures-Scales (MSS) in Project Execution Management (PEM)

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2022.106146, PP. 2959-2973

Keywords: CBS, MSS, Functional Structure, GVT, Virtual Teams

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This research study focuses on project organization structure, multi-tasking, issues, challenges, and limitations that occur during the project execution for a conventional and virtual team. This research aims to understand the importance of the technical labor force in the organization and fill the human resources gap in project engineering, construction, and management implementation. The project is unique and must be dealt with highly technical by the project team. Projects might be the same structure and scale but in different conditions, parameters, and requirements. In general, dealing with and executing other projects is challenging. The design guidelines are formatted, although not entirely the same. The process model uses model-based optimization to compare the conventional and virtual MSS organizational structures to optimize, innovate, and multi-tasking project staff, personnel, and direct technical members. The study will include the importance of global virtual teams (GVT) and the contribution of software collaboration, including cloud-based software (CBS). Multi structures-scales (MSS) concept can be a diversified, optimized, and innovative way to increase team effectiveness, technical dependence, and utilize existing resources. It uses organizational productivity and the individual living of project team members. However, even though the MSS concept seeks to lower the labor cost and reduce individual participation, the labor issue, technical workforce, challenges, disputes, and other problems are not inevitable. As a result, in this implementation, the corporate organization will solidify the project team structure into multi-project execution even to long-term employment and operation. The PE/S can perform simultaneously in different stages of the same type of project. In contrast, a PM can perform additional steps even on other kinds of projects. Furthermore, in the study, PS and PM can effectively function if not more than three (3) projects; otherwise, low-performance evaluation and low-quality product results occur. In this regard, further study and research related to this topic for better implementation in the field.

References

[1]  Alnsour, B. H. (2014). The Use of Virtual Project Teams for Project Management in Jordanian Corporation. Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, 2, 50-60.
https://doi.org/10.15604/ejbm.2014.02.02.004
[2]  ASEM (2019). A Guide to the Engineering Management Body of Knowledge. EMBOK Guide 5th Edition, The American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM).
[3]  Behling, C. (2019). Project Success in Virtual Projects: A Qualitative Study of Leadership Behaviors. Capella University.
[4]  Beise, C., Carte, T., Vician, C., & Chidambaram, L. (2010). A Case Study of Project Management Practices in Virtual Settings: Lessons from Working in and Managing Virtual Teams. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 41, 75-97.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1899639.1899644
[5]  Casey, V. (2010). Developing Trust in Virtual Software Development Team. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 5, 41-58.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762010000200004
[6]  Casey, V., & Richardson, I. (2008). Virtual Teams: Understanding the Impact of Fear. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 13, 511-526.
https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.404
[7]  Christopoulos, A., Conrad, M., & Shukla, M. (2016). Between Virtual & Real: Exploring Hybrid Interaction and Communication in Virtual Worlds. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 23-42.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMILE.2016.075038
[8]  Crayon, C., Gyurcsak, S. A., Patton, T., & Steigerwald, A. (2017). Managing a Virtual Project Team: Offshoring Technical Services in the Philippines. International Journal of Global Business, 10, 37-46.
[9]  Cripe, K. M., & Burleigh, C. (2022). Examining Leadership Skills, Behaviors, and Effective Communication for Virtual IT Project Managers. Team Performance Management, 28, 223-237.
https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-11-2021-0085
[10]  Daim, T. U. (2012). Performance Challenges in Virtual Teams: A Comparative Case Analysis. International Journal Project Organization and Management, 4, 218-230.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2012.048222
[11]  Dumitrascu, I., & Dumitrascu, D. (2016). Creating Effective International Virtual Project Team. Revista Economica, 68, 46-56.
[12]  Fisher, C. (2014). New Techniques in Project Management. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4, 739-750.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2014.412080
[13]  Gamage, N. B. J. (2016). The Impact of Project Management in Virtual Environment: A Software Industry Perspective. arXiv:1601.01220
[14]  Kaufmann, C., & Kock, A. (2022). Does Project Management Matter? The Relationship between Project Management Effort, Complexity, and Profitability. International Journal of Project Management, 40, 624-633.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.05.007
[15]  McLarnon, M. J. W., O’Neill, T. A., Taras, V., Law, D., Donia, M. B. L., & Steel, P. (2019). Global Virtual Team Communication, Coordination, and Performance across Three Peer Feedback Strategies. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 51, 207-218.
https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000135
[16]  PMI (2021). The Standard for Project Management and a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, Project Management Institute (PMI).
[17]  Ybañez, R. (2017). Virtual Project Management in Project Execution. PUP MCM-608, Special Topics No. 2, and Thesis.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133