全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

职业打假的规范路径和制度化探析
Exploring the Path of Professional Counterfeiting Regulation and Institutionalization

DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2022.1110606, PP. 4436-4442

Keywords: 知假买假,职业打假,惩罚性赔偿,消费者保护
Knowingly Buying a Fake
, Professional Counterfeiting, Punitive Damages, Consumer Protection

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

《食品安全法》与《消费者权益保护法》中对消费者权益保护的规定不统一,现有法律体系中对知假买假者定义以及规范制度的模糊性,导致各地法院出现同案不同判的现象。在市场经济飞速发展的今天,假冒伪劣产品和不良商贩不断涌现,要保护市场经济秩序,需要结合民间打假者的力量。对此,应当通过立法或者司法解释,赋予职业打假者获得惩罚性赔偿的权利,同时也要完善公共监督制度,防止恶性打假。
The lack of uniformity in the protection of consumer rights and interests in the Food Safety Law and the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests Law, the vagueness of the existing legal sys-tem in defining those who know about counterfeits and in regulating the system, have led to dif-ferent judgments in courts around the world in the same case. In today’s rapidly developing market economy, counterfeit and shoddy products and unscrupulous traders are constantly emerging, and the protection of the market economy needs to be combined with the power of private counterfeiters. In this regard, legislation or judicial interpretation should be adopted to give professional counterfeiters the right to obtain punitive damages, while the public supervision system should also be improved to prevent vicious counterfeiting.

References

[1]  田原. “知假买假”的全领域认可与制度规范[J]. 中国商论, 2022(6): 53-55.
[2]  张印东. 论“知假买假”行为的法律规制[J]. 市场周刊, 2021, 34(8): 163-165.
[3]  陈浩然. 惩罚性赔偿在职业打假中的司法认定研究[J]. 法制博览, 2022(10): 32-35.
[4]  陈磊, 孙天骄. 民间打假人疑假买假者引发争议: 民间打假人到底算不算消费者? [N]. 法制日报, 2022-03-16(008).
[5]  刘冉. “知假买假”行为涉及的相关问题研究——基于三十三份终审判决案例分析[J]. 法制博览, 2022(10): 143-145.
[6]  何文杰. “知假买假消费者”的法律规制新探——从立法论和解释论的双重视角分析[J]. 生产力研究, 2013(10): 75-78.
[7]  杨洋. 知假买假中惩罚性赔偿的边际研究[J]. 法制博览, 2021(33): 182-183.
[8]  廖晓虹, 谷少永. 电子商务行业“职业打假”的特点、成因与解决[J]. 法制博览, 2022(3): 14-17.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133