|
也谈《宋史艺文志考证》的学术贡献
|
Abstract:
陈乐素先生所著《宋史艺文志考证》,体例谨严,考辨精善,对《宋志》书籍重出现象进行了深入探讨,对《宋志》著录宋前书籍的流传情况多所措意,对《宋志》史源的考察与研究用力尤深,这些对全面准确认识《宋志》的复杂构成颇有意义,理应引起学术界的高度重视。
Chen Lesu’s “The Textual Research of Song Shi Yi Wen Zhi” is rigorous in style and excellent in examination. It has an in-depth discussion on the reappearance of the “Song Shi Yi Wen Zhi” books and paid much attention to the circulation of the pre-Song books recorded in “Song Shi Yi Wen Zhi”. Particular attention is paid to the investigation and research of the historical sources of “Song Shi Yi Wen Zhi”. These are of great significance for a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the complex composition of “Song Shi Yi Wen Zhi”, which should arouse great attention from academic circles.
[1] | 永瑢, 等. 四库全书总目: 第85卷[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2017: 728. |
[2] | 脱脱, 等. 宋史: 第202卷[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1979: 5034. |
[3] | 刘兆祐. 宋史艺文志史部佚籍考[M]. 台北: 丛书编审委员会, 1984. |
[4] | 顾吉辰. 宋史比事质疑[M]. 北京: 书目文献出版社, 1987: 227-280. |
[5] | 顾吉辰. 宋史考证[M]. 上海: 华东理工大学出版社, 1994: 325-467. |
[6] | 张固也. 宋史艺文志考证读后[J]. 书品, 2002(5): 28-32. |
[7] | 陈乐素. 宋史艺文志考证[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2002. |