全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

腰大池–腹腔分流术治疗脑血管病继发慢性脑积水的安全性及有效性分析
Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Lumbar-Peritoneal Shunt in the Treatment of Chronic Hydrocephalus Secondary to Cerebrovascular Disease

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.12101379, PP. 9534-9539

Keywords: 脑积水,脑血管病,腰大池–腹腔分流,并发症
Hydrocephalus
, Cerebrovascular Disease, Lumbar-Peritoneal Shunt, Complications

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:评估腰大池–腹腔分流术(LPS)治疗脑血管病(CVD)继发慢性脑积水的安全性及有效性。方法:回顾性分析我科2020年4月~2022年4月因慢性脑积水行腰大池–腹腔分流术(LPS)的病例资料,筛选原发病为CVD继发的出血性脑卒中病例。汇总并分析术后症状改善、并发症情况及随访结果。结果:共31例病人,动脉瘤破裂性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH) 21例、烟雾病(MMD)及烟雾综合征(MMS) 6例、脑血管畸形4例。术前昏迷3例,余28例症状主要包括步态不稳、小便失禁、记忆力减退及进行性痴呆。7例围手术期未停用抗血小板药物。随访3个月~2年,截止随访结束:3例昏迷者2例意识清醒,1例昏睡;余28例步态不稳、小便失禁及进行性痴呆、记忆力减退症状均消失。2例术后1周内出现分流管脱出腹腔,给予重新探查置管。无颅内出血及感染、癫痫等并发症。结论:LPS对CVD继发慢性脑积水的治疗安全有效,尤其适用于CVD中脑室–腹腔分流手术风险高的特殊病例。
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lumbar-peritoneal shunt (LPS) in the treat-ment of chronic hydrocephalus secondary to cerebrovascular disease (CVD). Methods: The clinical data of lumbar-peritoneal shunt (LPS) for chronic hydrocephalus in our department from April 2020 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, cases of hemorrhagic stroke secondary to CVD as the primary disease were screened out. Clinical data including symptom improvement, complica-tions and follow-up results were summarized and analyzed. Results: A total of 31 patients were in-cluded: 21 cases of aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), 6 cases of moyamoya disease (MMD) and moyamoya syndrome (MMS), and 4 cases of cerebrovascular malformation. Preoperative coma was observed in 3 cases, and symptoms of the rest 28 cases mainly included gait instability, urinary incontinence, memory loss and progressive dementia. In 7 cases, antiplatelet drugs were not discontinued during the perioperative period. The follow-up period was 3 months to 2 years, at the end of the follow-up: among the 3 coma patients, 2 were conscious and 1 was lethargic, and symptoms of gait instability, urinary incontinence, progressive dementia and memory loss disap-peared in the rest 28 cases. In 2 cases, the shunt was dislodged from the abdominal cavity within 1 week after surgery, then surgery of abdominal cavity exploration and shunt reposition was per-formed. No intracranial hemorrhage, infection, epilepsy and other complications occurred. Conclu-sion: LPS is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic hydrocephalus secondary to CVD, and is especially suitable for special cases with high risk of ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in CVD.

References

[1]  Israelsson, H., Larsson, J., Eklund, A., et al. (2020) Risk Factors, Comorbidities, Quality of Life, and Complications af-ter Surgery in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Review of the INPH-CRasH Study. Neurosurgical Focus, 49, E8.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.7.FOCUS20466
[2]  Bayar, M.A., Tekiner, A., Celik, H., et al. (2018) Efficacy of Lumboperitoneal Shunting in Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Turkish Neurosurgery, 28, 62-66.
[3]  Chen, Q., Feng, Z., Tan, Q., et al. (2017) Post-Hemorrhagic Hydrocephalus: Recent Advances and New Therapeutic Insights. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 375, 220-230.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.072
[4]  Park, Y.K., Yi, H.J., Choi, K.S., et al. (2018) Predicting Factors for Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien), 160, 1407-1413.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3560-6
[5]  Paisan, G.M., Ding, D., Starke, R.M., et al. (2018) Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Predictors and Long-Term Functional Outcomes. Neurosurgery, 83, 393-402.
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx393
[6]  宁铁英, 张晓鹏. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血并发慢性脑积水的危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床研究, 2019, 32(5): 634-636.
[7]  李岩, 吴冬雪, 樊丰势, 等. 特发性正常压力脑积水的治疗策略研究[J]. 中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2018, 17(4): 340-344.
[8]  Li, Y., Wu, D., Wu, C., et al. (2014) Changes in Neural Stem Cells in the Subventricular Zone in a Rat Model of Communicating Hydrocephalus. Neurosci-ence Letters, 578, 153-158.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.053
[9]  贾建文, 刘赫, 钟红亮, 等. 老年动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后危险因素[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(20): 5012-5013.
[10]  李剑, 陈建国, 杨柳, 等. 腰大池-腹腔分流术和脑室-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水的对比分析[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2020, 25(9): 629-630.
[11]  张楷文, 张国福, 苏晨芳, 等. 腰大池-腹腔分流治疗外伤性交通性脑积水[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 1996(6): 34-36.
[12]  陈昌, 吴章泽, 王一芳, 等. 可调压分流管腰大池腹腔分流术治疗创伤后脑积水的临床疗效及对远期预后的影响[J]. 中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2020, 18(21): 3688-3691.
[13]  Basaran, R., Efendi-oglu, M., Bolukbasi, F.H., et al. (2014) Spinal Intradural Hematoma and Permanent Paraparesis after a Lumboperitoneal Shunt Operation: An Unusual Complication. Asian Spine Journal, 8, 516-520.
https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.516
[14]  符星, 刘景平, 万新, 等. 腰大池-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2018, 23(1): 48-49.
[15]  Hudson, J.S., Nagahama, Y., Nakagawa, D., et al. (2018) Hemorrhage Associated with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients on a Regimen of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Neurosurgery, 129, 916-921.
https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.JNS17642
[16]  高静, 王青桐, 王志南, 等. 烟雾病患者搭桥手术后发生脑梗死的影响因素分析[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61(11): 73-76.
[17]  赵东红, 李晶. 术前液体治疗对成人烟雾病患者麻醉诱导后血压波动的效果分析[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2022, 19(4): 264-270, 277.
[18]  Gutiérrez-González, R. and Boto, G.R. (2010) Do Antibiotic-Impregnated Catheters Prevent Infection in CSF Diversion Procedures? Review of the Literature. Journal of Infection, 61, 9-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2010.03.030
[19]  龚江标, 温良, 杨小锋, 等. 不同分流方式治疗创伤后脑积水的疗效及并发症分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2016, 32(2): 105-109.
[20]  张海兵, 李青, 朱治, 等. 单纯脑室外引流继发颅内感染的危险因素分析[J]. 中国医药科学, 2021, 11(22): 149-153.
[21]  Chiewvit, S., Nuntaaree, S., Kanchaanapiboon, P., et al. (2014) Assessment Lumboperitoneal or Ventric-uloperitoneal Shunt Patency by Radionuclide Technique: A Review Experience Cases. World Journal of Nuclear Medi-cine, 13, 75-84.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139135

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133