|
糜子农家种资源抽穗期与产量性状关系分析
|
Abstract:
为筛选优良的糜子种质资源,选育高产优质的糜子新品种,本研究运用相关性分析、主成分分析、聚类分析对承德地区搜集到的91份糜子种质资源的抽穗期与产量性状之间的关系进行综合分析。结果表明,糜子的产量性状中单穗粒重变异系数最大,为84.4%,单穗重的变异系数最小,为37.5%。相关性分析中抽穗期与单穗重呈正相关,与单穗粒重不相关,与千粒重呈负相关。主成分分析将4个性状简化为3个因子,累积贡献率达92.439%。聚类分析在遗传距离10.0处将91份糜子种质资源分为2个类群,第I类群在遗传距离5.0处又可分为3个类群;得出抽穗期在64 d~67 d的范围内的糜子产量性状较高。
In order to screen excellent proso millet germplasm resources and breed new varieties of proso millet with high yield and good quality, correlation analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to comprehensively analyze the relationship of the heading date and yield traits of 91 proso millet germplasm resources in Chengde area. The results showed that the variation coefficient of grain weight per panicle was the highest (84.4%), and that of grain weight per panicle was the lowest (37.5%). In correlation analysis, heading date was positively correlated with single panicle weight, but not with grain weight per panicle, but negatively correlated with 1000-grain weight. Principal component analysis simplified the four traits into three factors, and the cumulative contribution rate reached 92.439%. Cluster analysis showed that 91 proso millet germplasm resources were divided into two groups at genetic distance 10.0, and the first group was divided into three groups at genetic distance 5.0. The results showed that the comprehensive yield of proso millet was higher in the range of 64 d to 67 d heading date.
[1] | 苏旺, 屈洋, 冯佰利, 柴岩. 沟垄覆膜集水模式提高糜子光合作用和产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(13): 137-145. |
[2] | 宋艳丽, 张东旗, 赵涛, 王睿豪, 黄贵斌, 梁鸡保, 高小丽. 不同种植方式对糜子干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(12): 26-34. |
[3] | 张翔宇, 李海, 梁海燕, 宋晓强, 邓亚蕊. 糜子品种在晋北地区的引种比较试验[J]. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(17): 1-2. https://doi.org/10.19754/j.nyyjs.20200915001 |
[4] | 郑楠楠, 贠婷婷, 幺杨, 任贵兴, 王春玲, 綦文涛. 不同品种黍子营养成分及功能活性成分差异化分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(1): 348-353+359. https://doi.org/10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.01.062 |
[5] | 柴岩. 糜子(黄米)的营养和生产概况[J]. 粮食加工, 2009, 34(4): 90-91. |
[6] | 王婧莹, 赵广欣, 邱冠凯, 方军. 水稻抽穗期途径基因的磷酸化、泛素化研究进展[J/OL]. 中国水稻科学, 1-14. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zgsdkx202203001, 2022-04-06. |
[7] | 杨晓菲, 张树军, 唐敏. 播期和温度对冬小麦抽穗期的影响分析[J]. 河南科学, 2021, 39(6): 929-933. |
[8] | 李彤霄, 王君, 赵国强. 气候变化及其对河南省冬小麦抽穗-成熟期的影响[J]. 河南水利与南水北调, 2011(3): 49-51. |
[9] | 黄英杰, 林润年. 黍子主要农艺性状对产量影响的效应分析[J]. 吉林农业科学, 1993(4): 31-33.
https://doi.org/10.16423/j.cnki.1003-8701.1993.04.008 |
[10] | Hu, Y., et al. (2008) Genetic Diversity among Chi-nese Landraces and Cultivars of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Revealed by the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Annals of Applied Biology, 153, 357-364.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2008.00263.x |
[11] | Liu, M., et al. (2016) Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Cultivars and Landraces in China Based on Microsatellite Mark-ers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17, 370.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030370 |
[12] | Hunt, H.V., et al. (2011) Genetic Diversity and Phylogeography of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) across Eurasia. Molecular Ecology, 20, 4756-4771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05318.x |
[13] | 赵芳, 魏玮, 张晓磊, 宋国亮, 王晓明, 赵治海, 赵春慧. 224个谷子品种农艺性状聚类和相关性分析[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(1): 74-83. https://doi.org/10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2022.01.074 |
[14] | 许有诚, 赵庄, 卢日刚, 李丹凤. 主成分分析在中药质量分析及质量评价中的应用进展[J]. 大众科技, 2021, 23(8): 37-41. |
[15] | 宋江峰, 李大婧, 刘春泉, 刘玉花. 甜糯玉米软罐头主要挥发性物质主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(10): 2122-2131. |
[16] | 刘杰, 常兴山, 孙锋, 周建辉. 基于聚类分析的数据文件格式分析方法[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2022, 44(1): 93-99. |
[17] | Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0 |
[18] | 孙亚强. 酸枣种质资源遗传多样性分析及其核心种质的构建[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2016. |
[19] | 王建丽, 刘杰淋, 朱瑞芬, 钟鹏, 尤佳, 邸桂俐, 韩微波, 申忠宝. 28份籽粒苋种质资源的主要农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1050-1059. |
[20] | 吕伟, 韩俊梅, 文飞, 任果香, 王若鹏, 刘文萍. 不同来源芝麻种质资源的表型多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(1): 234-242+251. https://doi.org/10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20191026001 |