This research examines and reframes the long-standing pursuit of validation in personality research, in response to a shift in the field to focus on inter-individual idiographic contexts and constructs by focusing on Know- ledge-and-Appraisals Personality Architecture (KAPA) as a method for person-centred, non-trait-based personality research. Aspects of instrument validity and validation are addressed, exploring relationships of cognition with self-variables to support the unique and informative nature of KAPA model for measuring personality architecture. First the validity of two empirical questionnaires, Self-efficacy for Performing (SEP) and the Metacognitive Thinking Questionnaire (MTQ) are demonstrated through EFA and CFA. Then the KAPA model for personality architecture, a person-based method that sits outside the traditional questionnaire approach to measuring personality, is validated by using elements of traditional validation and through exploring theoretically expected ontological relationships.
References
[1]
AERA, American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1974). Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests. American Psychological Association.
[2]
AERA, American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Psychological Association.
[3]
AERA, American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
[4]
Alavi, M., Visentin, D. C., Thapa, D. K., Hunt, G. E., Watson, R., & Cleary, M. (2020). Chi-Square for Model Fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76, 2209-2221. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14399
[5]
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-Names: A Psycho-Lexical Study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1-171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
[6]
American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurements Used in Education (1954). Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51(2, Pt 2), 1-38.
[7]
Artistico, R., & Rothenberg, A. M. (2013). Assessing Strengths and Weaknesses in Solving Work Problems: A Knowledge and Appraisal Personality Architecture (KAPA) Analysis of the Trait Conscientiousness and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v5n3p84
[8]
Bailey, R., & Wells, A. (2015). Development and Initial Validation of a Measure of Metacognitive Beliefs in Health Anxiety: The MCQ-HA. Psychiatry Research, 230, 871-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.035
[9]
Bandura, A. (1969). Social-Learning Theory of Identificatory Processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (pp. 213-262). Rand McNally & Company.
[10]
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
[11]
Bandura, A. (1986). Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs.
[12]
Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of Cognitive Processes through Perceived Self-Efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729-735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729
[13]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.
[14]
Bandura, A. (1999). A Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. In L. Pervin, & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). Guilford Publications. (Reprinted in D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The Coherence of Personality. Guilford Press)
[15]
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 307-337). Information Age Publishing.
[16]
Beckmann, N., & Wood, R. E. (2017). Dynamic Personality Science. Integrating Between-Person Stability and Within-Person Change. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article No. 1486. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-345-0
[17]
Berry, J. M., West, R. L., & Dennehey, D. M. (1989). Reliability and Validity of the Memory Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Developmental Psychology, 25, 701-713. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.701
[18]
Blunch, N. J. (2008). The Measurement Model in SEM: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using SPSS and AMOS (pp. 127-156). Sage.
[19]
Bong, M. (2006). Asking the Right Question. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (pp. 287-305). Information Age Publishing.
[20]
Borgers, N., Sikkel, D., & Hox, J. (2004). Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point. Quality and Quantity, 38, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013236.29205.a6
[21]
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061-1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
[22]
Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1977). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Form G. Consulting Psychologists Press.
[23]
Brown, A. L. (1987). Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember. A Problem of Metacognition. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Erlbaum.
[24]
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Accessing Model Fit. Sage.
[25]
Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Sage.
[26]
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Erlbaum.
[27]
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Taylor & Francis Group.
[28]
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
[29]
Calarco, D., Ferrante, D., & Di Blas, L. (2015). La coerenza della personalità da una prospettiva socio-cognitiva: Uno studio sulla variabilità intraindividuale dell’autoefficacia percepita in situazioni sociali. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 42, 829-852.
[30]
Carlson, R. (1971). Where Is the Person in Personality Research? Psychological Bulletin, 75, 203-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030469
[31]
Cattell, R. B. (1978). Fixing the Number of Factors: The Most Practicable Psychometric Procedures. In The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences (pp. 72-91). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2262-7_5
[32]
Cervone, D. (2000). Thinking about Self-Efficacy. Behavior Modification, 24, 30-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445500241002
[33]
Cervone, D. (2004). The Architecture of Personality. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Psychologia-Paedagogia, 49, 3-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.183
[34]
Cervone, D. (2005). Personality Architecture: Within-Person Structures and Processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423-452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070133
[35]
Cervone, D. (2021). Five Paths to Personality Coherence: Integrative Implications of the Knowledge-and-Appraisal Personality Architecture. European Journal of Personality, 36, 319-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211015599
[36]
Cervone, D., Caldwell, T. L., Fiori, M., Orom, H., Shadel, W. G., Kassel, J. D., & Artistico, D. (2008). What Underlies Appraisals? Experimentally Testing a Knowledge-and-Appraisal Model of Personality Architecture among Smokers Contemplating High-Risk Situations. Journal of Personality, 76, 929-968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00510.x
[37]
Churchill, G. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110
[38]
Clark, D. A., Purdon, C., & Wang, A. (2003). The Meta-Cognitive Beliefs Questionnaire: Development of a Measure of Obsessional Beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00032-3
[39]
Cortina, J. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Research, 78, 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
[40]
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
[41]
De Jager, B., Jansen, M., & Reezigt, G. (2005). The Development of Metacognition in Primary School Learning Environments. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450500114181
[42]
De Winter, J. C., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170902794206
[43]
Denissen, J. J., Geenen, R., Van Aken, M. A., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and Validation of a Dutch Translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701845229
[44]
DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further Investigating Method Effects Associated with Negatively Worded Items on Self-Report Surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440-464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
[45]
Everitt, B. S. (1975). Multivariate Analysis: The Need for Data, and other Problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 237-240. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.126.3.237
[46]
Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practice and Recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617693063
[47]
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
[48]
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the Development of a Metacognition Construct for Communities of Inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001
[49]
Gaudry, E., Vagg, P., & Spielberger, C. (1975). Validation of the State-Trait Distinction in Anxiety Research. Multivariate Behavior Research, 10, 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1003_6
[50]
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 Update (10th ed.). Pearson.
[51]
Geweke, J. F., & Singleton, K. J. (1980). Interpreting the Likelihood Ratio Statistic in Factor Models When Sample Size Is Small. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1980.10477442
[52]
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
[53]
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor Analysis (1st ed.). W. B. Saunders Company.
[54]
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[55]
Green, S. B. (1991). How Many Subjects Does It Take to Do a Regression Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
[56]
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of Metacognition in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428
[57]
Hoekstra, R., Vugteveen, J., Warrens, M. J., & Kruyen, P. M. (2019). An Empirical Analysis of Alleged Misunderstandings of Coefficient Alpha. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22, 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1547523
[58]
Hoffner, R. (2006). The Architecture of Personality in the Context of Work. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/34885
[59]
Hoffner, R. A. (2009). Measuring Personality in Context: Improving Predictive Accuracy in Selection Decision Making. Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/37859
[60]
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Sage.
[61]
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating Model Fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76-99). Sage.
[62]
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
[63]
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[64]
Huang, C. (2016). Achievement Goals and Self-Efficacy: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.002
[65]
Jackson, D., Gillaspy, J., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
[66]
Jayapraba, G. (2013). Metacognitive Instruction and Cooperative Learning-Strategies for Promoting Insightful Learning in Science. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4, 165-172.
[67]
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California.
[68]
Jung, C. G. ([1921] 1971). Psychological Types. Collected Works, Volume 6, Princeton University Press.
[69]
Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (1995). Comprehension Monitoring and the Level of Comprehension in High- and Low-Achieving Primary School Children’s Reading. Learning and Instruction, 5, 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R
[70]
Kleinstäuber, M., Weise, C., Andersson, G., & Probst, T. (2018). Personality Traits Predict and Moderate the Outcome of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Chronic Tinnitus. International Journal of Audiology, 57, 538-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1432902
[71]
Kline, P. (1999). The Handbook of Psychological Testing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[72]
Kline, R. B. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford.
[73]
Kohút, M., Kohútová, V., & Halama, P. (2021). Big Five Predictors of Pandemic-Related Behavior and Emotions in the First and Second COVID-19 Pandemic Wave in Slovakia. Personality and Individual Differences, 180, Article ID: 110934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110934
[74]
Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An Overview. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474273.pdf
[75]
Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.241
[76]
Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139, 439-457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457
[77]
Matthews, G. (2018). Cognitive-Adaptive Trait Theory: A Shift in Perspective on Personality. Journal of Personality, 86, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12319
[78]
McCormick, C. B., Dimmitt, C. A. R. E. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2012). Metacognition, Learning, and Instruction. In Handbook of Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop207004
[79]
McKenna, M., Cervone, D., Roy, A., & Burkett, C. (2021). Personality Coherence in Acts and Texts: Searching for Coherence within and beyond Trait Categories. European Journal of Personality, 36, 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211022131
[80]
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment. Educational Researcher, 18, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018002005
[81]
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. Wiley.
[82]
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a Cognitive Social Learning Reconceptualization of Personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035002
[83]
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing Situations, Dispositions, Dynamics, and Invariance in Personality Structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
[84]
Molenaar, P. C. (2004). A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever. Measurement, 2, 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1
[85]
Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum Sample Size Recommendations for Conducting Factor Analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
[86]
Nicholas, M. K., McGuire, B. E., & Asghari, A. (2015). A 2-Item Short Form of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of PSEQ-2. The Journal of Pain, 16, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.002
[87]
Pearman, A., Lustig, E., Hughes, M. L., & Hertzog, C. (2020). Initial Evidence for the Efficacy of an Everyday Memory and Metacognitive Intervention. Innovation in Aging, 4, 500-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1617
[88]
Pervin, L. A. (1994). A Critical Analysis of Current Trait Theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0502_1
[89]
Petzold, N., Landinez, L., & Baaken, T. (2019). Disruptive Innovation from a Process View: A Systematic Literature Review. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28, 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12313
[90]
Phan, H. P. (2009) Relations between Goals, Self-Efficacy, Critical Thinking and Deep Processing Strategies: A Path Analysis. Educational Psychology, 29, 777-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903289423
[91]
Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
[92]
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A Method for Comparing Completely Standardized Solutions in Multiple Groups. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 292-308. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_9
[93]
Renner, K. H., Klee, S., & von Oertzen, T. (2020). Bringing Back the Person into Behavioural Personality Science Using Big Data. European Journal of Personality, 34, 670-686. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2303
[94]
Ritchie, L., & Williamon, A. (2011). Measuring Distinct Types of Musical Self-Efficacy. Psychology of Music, 39, 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610374895
[95]
Ritchie, L., & Williamon, A. (2012). Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of Musical Performance Quality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 334-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029619
[96]
Rogers, C. R. (1940). The Processes of Therapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 4, 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062536
[97]
Schellings, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011). Measuring Strategy Use with Self-Report Instruments: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9
[98]
Schunk, D. H., & Gunn, T. P. (1986). Self-Efficacy and Skill Development: Influence of Task Strategies and Attributions. The Journal of Educational Research, 79, 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1986.10885684
[99]
Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2011). Assessing Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulated Learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 282-297). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010
[100]
Scott, W. D., Paup, S., & Kirchhoff, C. (2021). Clinical Application of Social Cognitive Theory: A Novel Personality Assessment Procedure and a Case Study of Personality Coherence. European Journal of Personality, 36, 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211028362
[101]
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
[102]
Short, S., & Ross-Stewart, L. (2008). A Review of Self-Efficacy Based Interventions. In S. Mellalieu, & S. Hanton (Eds.), Advances in Applied Sport Psychology (pp. 231-290). Routledge.
[103]
Sireci, S. G. (2007). On Validity Theory and Test Validation. Educational Researcher, 36, 477-481. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07311609
[104]
Sireci, S. G. (2020). De-“Constructing” Test Validation. Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 1, Article 3. https://www.ce-jeme.org/journal/vol1/iss1/3
[105]
Stewart, D. (1981). The Application and Misapplication of Factor Analysis in Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800105
[106]
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
[107]
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. Norton.
[108]
Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted Conceptions of Fit in Structural Equation Models. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 10-39). Sage.
[109]
Thorndike, E. L. (1904). An Introduction to the Theory of Mental and Social Measurements. Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/13283-000
[110]
Tsai, M. J., Wang, C. Y., & Hsu, P. F. (2019). Developing the Computer Programming Self-Efficacy Scale for Computer Literacy Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56, 1345-1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746747
[111]
Uher, J. (2013). Personality Psychology: Lexical Approaches, Assessment Methods, and Trait Concepts Reveal Only Half of the Story—Why It Is Time for a Paradigm Shift. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9230-6
[112]
Van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye Tracking as a Tool to Study and Enhance Multimedia Learning. Learning and instruction, 20, 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.009
[113]
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Language Learning, 56, 431-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
[114]
Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
[115]
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of Variable and Subject Sampling on Factor Pattern Recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
[116]
Wellman, H. (1985). The Child’s Theory of Mind: The Development of Conscious Cognition. Academic Press.
[117]
Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A Short Form of the Metacognitions Questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5
[118]
Wise, J. B. (2007). Testing a Theory That Explains How Self-Efficacy Beliefs Are Formed: Predicting Self-Efficacy Appraisals across Recreation Activities. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 841-848. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2007.26.7.841
[119]
Yu D., & Hang C. C. (2010). A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x
[120]
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Routledge.
[121]
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663-676. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663
[122]
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A Review of Research on Metacognition in Science Education: Current and Future Directions. Studies in Science Education, 49, 121-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
