全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

典型月地返回再入加速度作用下躺姿人体生理效应
Physiological Effects in Lying Position under Typical Lunar-Earth Reentry Acceleration

DOI: 10.12677/JAST.2022.103005, PP. 44-53

Keywords: 返回再入,持续性加速度,超重,生理效应,躺姿,加速度防护,载人离心机
Reentry
, Sustained Acceleration, Hypergravity, Physiological Effects, Lying Position, Acceleration Protection, Manned Centrifuge

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

探索典型月地返回再入时人体躺姿状态下加速度过载的生理效应和作用规律。选拔11名志愿者完成最大峰值3 g、5 g的过载试验,其中5名志愿者另完成了最大峰值7 g的过载试验。利用载人离心机模拟两种典型过载:嫦娥返回模式、阿波罗返回模式。试验过程中监测志愿者心率、血压、血氧饱和度等生理指标,记录志愿者主观感受,并设计综合评分标准进行综合评价。志愿者全部完成预设试验;能够耐受峰值7 g的典型过载,但出现了明显的不适症状。试验过程中志愿者综合评分显著降低(P < 0.05)。随着过载增大,压迫性呼吸困难成为主要影响因素,个别志愿者出现低氧血症。与嫦娥返回过载环境相比,阿波罗返回过载环境下不适感稍强烈。典型月地返回躺姿状态,建议加强乘员胸部和呼吸功能的防护;5 g以上过载对人体生理指标和主观感受产生较大影响,因此飞船再入气动设计应尽量减少高过载作用时间。
To explore the physiological effects and rules of hypergravity on human body in lying position during the typical lunar-earth reentry, 11 volunteers were selected to complete the maximum peak overload test of 3 g and 5 g, and 5 of them completed the maximum peak overload test of 7 g. Two typical overload environments were simulated by manned centrifuge: Chang’e return mode and Apollo return mode. During the experiment, the physiological indexes such as heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored, the subjective feelings of the volunteers were recorded, and a comprehensive scoring standard was designed for comprehensive evaluation. All the volunteers completed the preset test; they were able to tolerate the typical overload of 7 g, but showed obvious symptoms of discomfort. The comprehensive score of the volunteers decreased significantly during the experiment (P < 0.05). With the increase of overload, compressive dyspnea became the main influencing factor, and some volunteers developed hypoxemia. Compared with Chang’e’s reentry mode, the discomfort in Apollo reentry mode is a little stronger. It is suggested to strengthen the protection of the occupant’s chest and respiratory function; the overload of more than 5 g has a great influence on the human physiological index and subjective feeling, so the aerodynamic design of the spacecraft reentry should reduce the high overload time as much as possible.

References

[1]  刘炳坤, 马红磊, 李富柱, 王健全, 肖艳华, 祝郁, 等. 典型月轨返回再入过载作用下乘员动力学响应的仿真分析[J]. 航天医学与医学工程, 2021, 34(2): 95-101.
[2]  刘炳坤, 马红磊, 编著. 加速度生理学[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2020.
[3]  王帅帅. 探月飞船跳跃式再入参数在线估计与先进制导方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2016.
[4]  Claude, A. (1972) Apollo Experience Report Mission Planning for Apollo Entry. NASA TN 6725.
[5]  James, O.R. (1969) Apollo Entry Summary Document Mission F. NASA Manned Space Center N70-34184.
[6]  Drexel, R.E. and Hunter, H.N. (1973) Apollo Experience Report: Command Module Crew-Couch/Restraint and Load-Attenuation Systems. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC.
[7]  Pollock, R.D., Hodkinson, P.D. and Smith, T.G. (2021) Oh G: The X, Y and Z of Human Physiological Responses to Acceleration. Experimental Physiology, 106, 2367-2384.
https://doi.org/10.1113/EP089712
[8]  Wood, E.H. and Clark, A. (1963) Influence of Acceleration on Pulmonary Physiology. Federation Proceedings, 22, 1024-1034.
[9]  Wood, E.H. (1967) Some Effects of Gravitational and Inertial Forces on the Cardiopulmonary System. Aerospace Medicine, 38, 225-233.
[10]  Prisk, G.K. (2019) Pulmonary Challenges of Prolonged Journeys to Space: Taking Your Lungs to the Moon. Medical Journal of Australia, 211, 271-276.
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50312
[11]  Menden, T., Alcaín, G.B., Stevenson, A.T., Pollock, R.D., Tank, H., Hodkinson, P., et al. (2021) Dynamic Lung Behavior under High G Acceleration Monitored with Electrical Impedance Tomography. Physiological Measurement, 42, Article ID: 094001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac1c63
[12]  Pollock, R.D., Jolley, C.J., Abid, N., Couper, J.H., Estrada-Petrocelli, L., Hodkinson, P.D., et al. (2021) Pulmonary Effects of Sustained Periods of High-G Acceleration Relevant to Suborbital Spaceflight. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 92, 633-641.
https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5790.2021
[13]  Sandler, H. (1966) Cineradiographic Observations of Human Subjects during Transverse Accelerations of +5Gx and +10Gx. Aerospace Medicine, 37, 445-448.
[14]  Lindberg, E.F., Marshall, H.W., Sutterer, W.F., McGuire, T.F. and Rood, E. (1962) Studies of Cardiac Output and Circulatory Pressures in Human Beings during Forward Acceleration. Aerospace Medicine, 33, 81-91.
[15]  薛月英, 刘光远, 谢宝生, 程学尧, 王彦昌. 不同方向超重作用下(犬)心血管系统反应规律的探讨[J]. 航天医学与医学工程, 2000, 13(2): 104-108.
[16]  Green, N.D.C. (2016) Long Duration Acceleration. Ernsting’s Aviation and Space Medicine, 5, 131-156.
[17]  吴斌, 薛月英, 吴萍, 谷志明, 刘兴华, 由广兴. 高+Gx 作用下人体的心肺反应[C]//中国生理学会第八届全国青年生理学工作者学术会议论文摘要. 南昌: 中国生理学会, 2009: 22.
[18]  孙浩, 马红磊, 刘炳坤, 王健全, 肖艳华, 祝郁, 等. 典型返回再入体位对HUMOS假人动态响应影响研究[J]. 国际航空航天科学, 2020(8): 86-92.
https://doi.org/10.12677/JAST.2020.84011
[19]  祝郁, 肖艳华, 王健全, 刘炳坤, 费锦学, 国耀宇, 等. 躺姿半弹道式再入假人动态响应研究[J]. 国际航空航天科学, 2020, 8(4): 108-113.
https://doi.org/10.12677/JAST.2020.84014
[20]  肖艳华, 刘炳坤, 王健全, 邓金辉, 祝郁, 刘志刚, 等. 登月返回再入人体卧姿和躺姿超重动态响应实验研究[J]. 载人航天, 2021, 27(1): 22-26.
[21]  孙喜庆, 姜世忠(主编). 航空航天生物动力学[M]. 西安: 第四军医大学出版社, 2013.
[22]  王浩, 张锦, 刘洪涛. 严重低氧血症患者SpO2正常一例[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2019, 35(4): 412-413.
[23]  孙膗. 浅谈血气分析仪电极法检测SaO2上的方法学限制[J]. 医学美学美容, 2015(4): 639-640.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133