全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Dynamic Programming Approach to the Design of Composite Aircraft Wings

DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2022.125011, PP. 194-207

Keywords: Aircraft Wing Design, Maximum Reliability Design, Minimum Weight Design, Dynamic Programming, Multiple Objective Optimization, Pareto Optimality

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A light and reliable aircraft has been the major goal of aircraft designers. It is imperative to design the aircraft wing skins as efficiently as possible since the wing skins comprise more than fifty percent of the structural weight of the aircraft wing. The aircraft wing skin consists of many different types of material and thickness configurations at various locations. Selecting a thickness for each location is perhaps the most significant design task. In this paper, we formulate discrete mathematical programming models to determine the optimal thicknesses for three different criteria: maximize reliability, minimize weight, and achieve a trade-off between maximizing reliability and minimizing weight. These three model formulations are generalized discrete resource-allocation problems, which lend themselves well to the dynamic programming approach. Consequently, we use the dynamic programming method to solve these model formulations. To illustrate our approach, an example is solved in which dynamic programming yields a minimum weight design as well as a trade-off curve for weight versus reliability for an aircraft wing with thirty locations (or panels) and fourteen thickness choices for each location.

References

[1]  Niu, M.C.Y. (1999) Airframe Structural Design: Practical Design Information and Data on Aircraft Structures. 2nd Edition, Adaso/Adastra Engineering Center, Hong Kong.
[2]  Luo, X. and Grandhi, R.V. (1997) ASTROS for Reliability-Based Multidisciplinary Structural Analysis and Optimization. Computers and Structures, 62, 737-745.
[3]  Pettit, C.L. and Grandhi, R.V. (2000) Multidisciplinary Optimization of Aerospace Structures with High Reliability. In: Kareem, A., et al., Ed., Proceedings of 8th ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, Notre Dame, Indiana.
[4]  Pettit, C.L. and Grandhi, R.V. (2003) Optimization of a Wing Structure for Gust Response and Aileron Effectiveness. Journal of Aircraft, 40, 1185-1191.
https://doi.org/10.2514/2.7208
[5]  Padmanabhan, D. (2003) Reliability-Based Optimization for Multidisciplinary System Design. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.
[6]  Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. and Venter, G. (2003) Imparting Desired Attributes by Optimization in Structural Design. Proceedings of 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, Virginia.
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-1546
[7]  Elham, A., van Toorent, M.J.L. and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. (2014) Bilevel Optimization Strategy for Aircraft Wing Design Using Parallel Computing. AIAA Journal, 52, 1770-1783.
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052696
[8]  Melchers, R.E. and Beck, A.T. (2018) Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Hoboken, New Jersey.
[9]  Bulson, P.S. (1970) The Stability of Flat Plates. 1st Edition, Chatto & Windus, London.
[10]  Ehrgott, M. (2005) Multicriteria Optimization. 2nd Edition, Springer, Heidelberg.
[11]  Miettinen, K. (1999) Nonlinear Multiple Objective Optimization. 1st Edition, Springer, Heidelberg.
[12]  Winston, W.L. (2003) Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms. 4th Edition, Cengage Learning, Boston, Massachusetts.
[13]  Bellman, R.E. and Dreyfus, S.E. (1962) Applied Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874651
[14]  Chung, K.F. (1997) A Mathematical Approach for the Design of Aircraft Wings. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133