|
|
浅论故意伤害罪的认定标准之修正
|
Abstract:
毋庸置疑，理论和实践中认为对故意伤害罪保护法益为身体完整性和“轻伤”为定罪依据。然而，揆诸现实，法益内容逐渐精神化以及现实情况变化，故意伤害罪的保护法益亟需增加精神伤害为本罪保护法益之一。故意伤害具有频发性、犯罪成本较低；轻微伤害危害程度不亚于财产类、侵犯名誉类犯罪；国外惩罚故意伤害较为严厉，基于此，轻微伤害理应纳入故意伤害罪。
Undoubtedly, in theory and practice, it is believed that the protection of legal interests for the crime of intentional injury is based on physical integrity and “minor injury”. However, due to the fact that the content of legal interests is gradually spiritualized and the changes in the reality, the protection of legal interests in the crime of intentional injury urgently needs to increase mental injury as one of the protection of legal interests in this crime. Intentional injury is frequent and the crime cost is low. The harm degree of minor injury is no less than that of property and reputation crimes. In foreign countries, the punishment of intentional injury is relatively severe. Based on this, minor injury should be included in the crime of intentional injury.
| [1] | 刘明祥. 伤害犯罪若干问题研究[J]. 江海学刊, 2007(3): 117-123. |
| [2] | 高铭瑄, 马克昌. 刑法学(第10版) [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 高等教育出版社, 2022: 464. |
| [3] | [德]亚图？考夫曼. 类推与“事务本质”——兼论类型理论[M]. 吴从周, 译. 台北: 台北学林文化事业有限公司, 1999: 89. |
| [4] | 张明楷. 法益初论(增订版) [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2021: 21, 40-44. |
| [5] | 韩瑞丽. 刑法法益的精神化倾向及其限定原则[J]. 郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011(6): 55-57. |
| [6] | [德]乌尔里希？贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004: 27. |
| [7] | 刘宪权, 陆一敏. 《刑法修正案(十一)》的解读与反思[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(1): 32-41. |
| [8] | 赵毅民, 周小东. 对36例受精神伤害的程度鉴定分析[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2002(1): 44-45. |
| [9] | 张明楷. 身体法益的刑法保护[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(6): 2-18. |
| [10] | 石经海. 故意伤害“轻伤与否”定性共识的刑法质疑——以刑法总分则关系下的完整法律适用为视角[J]. 现代法学, 2017(3): 112-121. |
| [11] | [日]西田典之. 日本刑法各论(第2版) [M]. 王昭武, 刘明祥, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2013: 40. |
