全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

借名买房合同行为法律效力问题探究
Study on the Legal Effect of Contract Behav-ior of Buying House under Borrowed Name

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2022.105103, PP. 808-813

Keywords: 借名买房,合同效力,物权归属
Buy a House under Borrowed Name
, Contract Effectiveness, Property Ownership

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

借名买房合同的学说性质、合同效力以及所购房屋的物权归属问题,在学术和理论上都存在一定争议。借名买房合同在性质上应当归属于无名合同的范畴当中;其合同效力也应当结合不同的情形予以考虑。此外,为保证其所购房屋物权效力以及市场秩序的稳定,其所购房屋物权应当结合借名人、出名人以及第三人的权利参与状态分别看待。
The theoretical nature of the contract, the validity of the contract and the ownership of the property right of the purchased house are controversial in both academic and theoretical aspects. The contract of buying house under borrowed name should belong to the category of nameless contract in nature; The effectiveness of the contract should also be considered in light of different circumstances. In addition, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the real right of the purchased housing and the stability of the market order, the real right of the purchased housing should be combined with the borrowing celebrity, the celebrity and the third party’s right to participate in the state of respectively.

References

[1]  冉克平. 论借名实施法律行为的效果[J]. 法学, 2014(2): 81-91.
[2]  杨代雄. 借名购房及借名登记中的物权变动[J]. 法学, 2016(8): 26-37.
[3]  周峰, 李兴. 隐名购房行为的法律性质认定与执法对策研究[J]. 法律适用, 2012(8): 58-61.
[4]  马强. 借名购房案件所涉问题之研究——以法院裁判的案件为中心[J]. 政治与法律, 2014(7): 12-22.
[5]  李双. 借名买房行为的法律效力研究[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2021, 21(8): 76-84+100.
[6]  孙宪忠, 常鹏翱. 论法律物权和事实物权的区分[J]. 法学研究, 2001, 23(5): 81-94.
[7]  马一德. 借名买房之法律适用[J]. 法学家, 2014(6): 133-146, 179-180.
[8]  翟业虎, 程婉秋. 借名买房行为法律问题初探[J]. 江淮论坛, 2015(4): 84-87.
[9]  程啸. 论不动产善意取得之构成要件——《中华人民共和国物权法》第106条释义[J]. 法商研究, 2010, 27(5): 74-84.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133