|
超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学诊断对不同大小甲状腺结节的诊断价值
|
Abstract:
目的:分析甲状腺不同大小结节进行超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学诊断(US-FNA)的阳性率和准确率。方法:研究我院2020年04月~2021年08月119例甲状腺结节患者,均进行US-FNA检查,根据结节大小不同将其分为三组,A组(结节直径 ≤ 5 mm,16例)、B组(结节直径6~10 mm,40例)、C组(结节直径 ≥ 10 mm,63例),以手术病理结果为金标准,分析A、B、C三组结节阳性检出率及诊断的准确率。结果:超声诊断US-FNA诊断阳性率为38.66%,与病理诊断阳性率48.74%对比无显著差异,无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。US-FNA穿刺准确率在B组(结节直径6~10 mm)最高为95.00%,与A组(结节直径 ≤ 5 mm)对比差异显著,具有统计学意义(P < 0.05),与C组(结节直径 ≥ 10 mm)对比差异不具有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学诊断对不同大小甲状腺结节均有较高临床应用价值。
Objective: To analyze the positive rate and accuracy rate of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspira-tion cytology (US-FNA) for thyroid nodules of different sizes. Methods: From April 2020 to August 2021, 119 patients with thyroid nodules underwent fine needle aspiration cytology under the guidance of ultrasound. They were divided into three groups according to the size of the nodules. Group A (nodule diameter ≤ 5 mm, 16 cases), Group B (nodule diameter 6~10 mm, 40 cases), and Group C (nodule diameter ≥ 10 mm, 63 cases), with the results of surgery and pathology as the gold standard, the positive detection rate of nodules and the accuracy of diagnosis in groups A, B, and C were analyzed. Results: The positive rate of US-FNA diagnosis by ultrasound was 38.66%, which was not significantly different from the positive rate of pathological diagnosis, which was 48.74%, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The accuracy rate of US-FNA puncture in group B (nodule di-ameter 6~10 mm) was the highest at 95.00%, which was significantly different from that in group A (nodule diameter ≤ 5 mm), with statistical significance (P < 0.05), and was significantly different from C group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between groups (nodule diameter ≥ 10 mm) (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology diag-nosis has high clinical application value for thyroid nodules of different sizes.
[1] | 黄启顺, 梁伟新. 超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检测不同大小可疑甲状腺结节的阳性率及准确率[J]. 中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学), 2021, 36(4): 26-27. |
[2] | 杨增娣, 杨艳婷. 不同甲状腺结节大小超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学诊断敏感性和准确性比较[J]. 河北医学, 2022, 28(1): 81-85. |
[3] | 骆鹏飞, 穆夏黎, 焦大海, 等. 甲状腺结节细针穿刺细胞学检查标本充分性的影响因素[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(24): 1913-1916. |
[4] | 王明辉, 马英路, 崔广和, 等. 细针穿刺细胞学检查和超声弹性成像及超声造影对甲状腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2018, 34(1): 9-13. |
[5] | Koo, D.H., Song, K.S., Bae, D.S., et al. (2016) Does Tumor Size Influence the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Thyroid Nodules? International Journal of Endocrinology, 2016, Article ID: 3803647. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3803647 |
[6] | 刘云, 陈松旺. 超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸活检在甲状腺微小结节定性诊断中的价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2019, 28(1): 42-45. |
[7] | 上海市医学会超声医学分会介入学组. 超声引导下甲状腺结节细针穿刺细胞学检查实践指南(2019版) [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(5): 369-383. |
[8] | 潘秀华. 超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸活检对不同大小甲状腺结节的诊断价值[J]. 中国医药指南, 2019, 17(30): 86-87. |
[9] | Unal, B. and Sezer, S. (2014) Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspi-ration Biopsy in Malignant Thyroid Nodules: Utility for Micronodules. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15, 8613-8616.
https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.20.8613 |
[10] | Xia, J.J., Li, M.S., Zheng, L. and Shi, Y.Z. (2017) Nondi-agnostic Cytological Results on Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Does the Thyroid Nodule Depth Matter. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 67, 115-124.
https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-170283 |
[11] | 谢雨, 李杨, 杜平杰, 等. 甲状腺结节大小对超声引导下细针穿刺活检诊断效能影响[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2022, 24(4): 316-317. |
[12] | de la Serna Higuera, C. (2019) Response to Cer-vicothoracic Abscess Secondary to Transesophageal Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration. Gastroenterología y Hepatología, 42, 458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastre.2019.01.019 |
[13] | 骆鹏飞, 穆夏黎, 等. 甲状腺结节细针穿刺中使用空芯针或带芯针的标本满意率的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(11): 1016-1019. |