|
析胡方平、熊禾融通先天八卦与《河图》之法
|
Abstract:
朱子对先天八卦与《河图》关系的论说体现在“则图画卦”之理中,但所论稍逊周详。后学胡方平、熊禾接续对卦、图关系之探讨。胡氏细解朱子“析合补空”之义,依循特定理路,将卦、图合而为一;熊氏则巧借朱子交易之说,以“阴阳相交”统贯于卦画阴阳与《河图》之数的分置对照中。经由对“西南易位”的各样开解,二儒大抵实现卦、图内在理路之融通。二儒之论瑕瑜互见,若置于元初这一特定历史语境下,其意义应一分为二地看待。
Zhu Xi’s theory on the relationship between the primordial eight trigrams and He Tu was embodied in the theory of “drawing trigrams by imitating Tu”, but his theory was a little less detailed. Hu Fangping and Xiong He continued to discuss the relationship between hexagrams and “Tu”. Hu Fangping carefully explained Zhu Xi’s theory of “separating and filling”, and combined hexagram and “Tu” into one according to a specific logical path. Xiong He, with the help of Zhu Zi’s theory of interchangeability, used the “intersection of Yin and Yang” running through the contrast between Yin and Yang in the hexagrams and the num-ber of He Tu. Through various interpretations of “south and west translocation”, the two scholars roughly realized the harmony of hexagrams and “Tu” based on internal logic. The theory of the two scholars has both strong and weak points, its significance should be viewed in two ways under the specific historical context of the early Yuan Dynasty.
[1] | 李秋丽. 元代易学史[M]. 济南: 齐鲁书社, 2020: 5+174. |
[2] | 朱熹, 撰. 易学启蒙[M]//朱子全书: 第1册. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2002: 211+214+215+238. |
[3] | 朱熹, 撰. 晦庵先生朱文公文集[M]//朱子全书: 第21册. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2002: 1637+1683. |
[4] | 王申子, 撰. 大易缉说[M]//易图文献选辑(第1辑): 第18册. 北京: 线装书局, 2020: 168-169. |
[5] | 胡一桂. 周易启蒙翼传[M]//文渊阁四库全书: 第22册. 台北: 台湾商务印书馆, 1986: 200. |
[6] | 胡方平. 易学启蒙通释[M]. 谷继明, 点校. 北京: 中华书局, 2019: 64-65+58. |
[7] | 李滉, 撰. 启蒙传疑[M]//易图文献选辑(第3辑): 第30册. 北京: 线装书局, 2020: 395+410. |
[8] | 杨士奇. 东里续集[M]//文渊阁四库全书: 第1238册. 台北: 台湾商务印书馆, 1986: 579. |
[9] | 鲍云龙. 天原发微[M]//易图文献选辑(第3辑): 第25册. 北京: 线装书局, 2020: 333. |
[10] | 熊禾. 勿轩易学启蒙图传通义[M]//续修四库全书: 第2册. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2002: 446+450+451. |
[11] | 谢辉. 元代朱子易学研究史[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2020: 249. |
[12] | 朱伯崑. 易学哲学史[M]. 北京: 昆仑出版社, 2005: 441. |
[13] | 张克宾. 朱熹易学思想研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2010: 114. |
[14] | 吴宁. 朱熹论画卦原理[J]. 现代哲学, 2019(4): 123-129. |