Introduction: The management of kidney stones has benefited from endoscopic techniques, in particular the development of flexible ureteroscopy (ureterorenoscopy). This endoscopic treatment has made it possible to treat many upper urinary tract stones, with satisfactory results and less morbidity. This innovative minimally invasive technique was introduced in our country in 2018. It is not practiced in all health structures. We report our experience. Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the place of flexible ureteroscopy laser, its feasibility, and the results on stones up to 30 mm in size only in the lower calicial group, while assessing the postoperative quality of life. Patients and Methods: We conducted a monocentric observational retrospective study at the Omar Bongo Ondimba Army Training Hospital (OBO ATH) on 22 patients with symptomatic inferior caliciel stones, over a period of January 2019 and December 2020 treated by flexible ureteroscopy laser (FUR-L), once or twice depending on the size of the residual fragments. Results: All the patients had symptomatic urolithiasis, diagnosed on the clinical elements, and confirmed in 77% by urinary computed tomography. The average age was 35.47 years ± 12, with a clear female predominance (64%). All the stones sat in the lower chalice. 66.5% of stones were larger than 10 mm. 75% of patients were “stones free” after one FUR-L session, and 100% after the second session. 10% of patients still had residual pain at 01 month which was absent at 03 month. 18% of postoperative urinary tract infections were treated with antibiotics. 90% of the patients had resumed an activity prior to 1 month. At 1 month and 3 months, 82% and 100% respectively were satisfied with the mode of treatment according to self-questioning. Conclusion: FUR-L remains a therapeutic modality for stones in the lower calicial group, for stones whose diameter is close to 30 mm. A sequential approach should be considered for diameter stone up to 30 mm.
References
[1]
Dretler, S.P. (1994) Ureteroscopic Fragmentation Followed by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. A Treatment Alternative for Selected Large or Staghorn Calculi. The Journal of Urology, 151, 842-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35102-9
[2]
Lechevallier, E., Saussine, C. and Traxer, O. (2008) Ureteroscopy for Calculation of the Upper Urinary Tract. Progrès en Urologie, 18, 912-916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.09.022
[3]
Breda, A., Ogunyemi, O., Leppert, J.T., Lam, J.S. and Schulam, P.G. (2008) Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Single Intrarenal Stones 2 cm or Greater—Is This the New Frontier? The Journal of Urology, 179, 981-984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083
[4]
NICE (2019) Renal and Ureteric Stones: Assessment and Management. BJU International, 123, 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14654
[5]
Cassell, A., Jalloh, M., Ndoye, M., et al. (2020) Surgical Management of Urolithiasis of the Upper Tract—Current Trend of Endourology in Africa. Research and Reports in Urology, 12, 225-238. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S257669
[6]
Ben, M.A., Qahatani, S., Ndoye, M., et al. (2011) Urétéroscopie souple dans le traitement des calculs du rein de 2 à 3cm [Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Kidney Stone between 2 and 3 cm]. Progrès en Urologie, 21, 327-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2010.07.012
[7]
Tzelves, L., Türk, C. and Skolarikos, A. (2020) European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines: Where Are We Going? European Urology, 30, 2405-4569.
[8]
Hughes, T., Ho, H.C., Pietropaolo, A., et al. (2020) Guideline of Guidelines for Kidney and Bladder Stones. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20315
[9]
Xu, C., Song, R., Lu, P., et al. (2020) A Retrospective Study Comparing Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of 20-30 mm Renal Stones in Obese Patients. PeerJ, 8, e8532. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8532
[10]
Hassan, A.I., Al-Hammodi, B.M. and Ramzi, R.M. (2020) Ureteroscopy in Ureteric Stone Management: The Need for Laser Lithotripsy and Ancillary Equipment. Urologiia, No. 4, 18-20. https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2020.4.18-20
[11]
Torricelli, F.C., De, S., Hinck, B., Noble, M. and Monga, M. (2014) Flexible Ureteroscopy with a Ureteral Access Sheath: When to Stent? Urology, 83, 278-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.002
[12]
Streeper, N.M. (2018) Asymptomatic Renal Stones—to Treat or Not to Treat. Current Urology Reports, 19, Article No. 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0782-3
[13]
Doizi, S. and Traxer, O. (2018) Flexible Ureteroscopy: Technique, Tips and Tricks. Urolithiasis, 46, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1030-x
[14]
Doizi, S., Knoll, T., Scoffone, C.M., Breda, A., Brehmer, M., Liatsikos, E., Cornu, J.N. and Traxer, O. (2014) First Clinical Evaluation of a New Innovative Ureteral Access Sheath (Re-TraceTM): A European Study. World Journal of Urology, 32, 143-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1094-3
[15]
Zewu, Z., Cui, Y., Feng, Z., Yang, L. and Chen, H. (2019) Comparison of Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Treating Intermediatesize Renal Stones (2-3 cm): A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 45, 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0510
[16]
Lavan, L., Herrmann, T., Netsch, C., Becker, B. and Somani, B.K. (2020) Outcomes of Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease in Anomalous Kidneys: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Urology, 38, 1135-1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02810-x
[17]
Davis, N.F., Quinlan, M.R., Browne, C., Bhatt, N.R., Manecksha, R.P., D’Arcy, F.T., Lawrentschuk, N. and Bolton, D.M. (2018) Single-Use Flexible Ureteropyeloscopy: A Systematic Review. World Journal of Urology, 36, 529-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2131-4
[18]
Zhang, J., Li, B., Li, G., Yang, Z., Ye, N., Liu, Y., Zhuo, H. and Hong, J. (2022) Rigid Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Lateral Decubitus Position for Upper Urinary Tract Stones. BMC Urology, 22, Article No. 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00977-x
[19]
Ma, Y.C., Jian, Z.Y., Jin, X., Li, H. and Wang, K.J. (2021) Stone Removing Efficiency and Safety Comparison between Single Use Ureteroscope and Reusable Ureteroscope: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Translational Andrology and Urology, 10, 1627-1636. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1399
[20]
Kanno, T., Matsuda, A., Sakamoto, H., Higashi, Y. and Yamada, H. (2013) Safety, and Efficacy of Ureteroscopy after Obstructive Pyelonephritis Treatment. International Journal of Urology, 20, 917-922. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12060
[21]
Ventimiglia, E., Smyth, N., Doizi, S., Jiménez Godínez, A., Barghouthy, Y., Corrales Acosta, M.A., Kamkoum, H., Somani, B. and Traxer, O. (2022) Can the Introduction of Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes Increase the Longevity of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes at a High-Volume Centre? World Journal of Urology, 40, 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03808-0
[22]
Türk, C., Vice-chair, A.S., Neisius, A., Petrik, A., Seitz, C., Thomas, K., et al. (2019) EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. EAU, Arnhem.
