全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Understanding Model Independent Genetic Mutations through Trends in Increase in Entropy

DOI: 10.4236/ojbiphy.2022.123007, PP. 165-171

Keywords: Statistical Physics, Mutations, Entropy, Energy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: A mutation, in general, can be defined as a change in the genetic sequence. Mutations can be changes as small as the substitution of a single DNA building block, or nucleotide base, with another nucleotide base. There can be larger mutations which can affect many genes on a chromosome. In this study we have tried to understand a normal mutation and a failed mutation from the point of view of entropy. We have shown that the entropy range of a normal mutation is less compared to the entropy range of a failed mutation. In this article we have plotted the increase of entropy of both types of mutations mentioned above. Statistical Physics of Partition Function and Entropy: In this section we have used statistical physics to define the partition function of an ensemble. Based on the partition function we have expressed how to calculate physical quantities such as average energy and entropy. Model Independent Mutation Entropy: The entropy of all processes increases. This is true even for biological systems. We have shown the difference between the entropy of a successful mutation and a failed mutation. Conclusion: In conclusion we have shown how the entropy of a successful mutation differs from that of a failed mutation. This opens up future research opportunities where we can apply this to specific biological systems.

References

[1]  Gerstung, M., Jolly, C., Leshchiner, I., Dentro, S.C., et al. (2020) The Evolutionary History of 2,658 Cancers. Nature, 578, 122-128.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1907-7
[2]  Mutation, Learn Science at Scitable (2018) Nature Education.
[3]  Sharma, S., Javadekar, S.M., Pandey, M., Srivastava, M., Kumari, R. and Raghavan, S.C. (2015) Homology and Enzymatic Requirements of Microhomology-Dependent Alternative End Joining. Cell Death & Disease, 6, Article No. e1697.
https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.58
[4]  Chen, J., Miller, B.F. and Furano, A.V. (2014) Repair of Naturally Occurring Mismatches Can Induce Mutations in Flanking DNA. eLife, 3, Article No. e02001.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02001
[5]  Bertram, J.S. (2000) The Molecular Biology of Cancer. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 21, 167-223.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-2997(00)00007-8
[6]  Aminetzach, Y.T., Macpherson, J.M. and Petrov, D.A. (2005) Pesticide Resistance via Transposition-Mediated Adaptive Gene Truncation in Drosophila. Science, 309, 764-767.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112699
[7]  Burrus, V. and Waldor, M.K. (2004) Shaping Bacterial Genomes with Integrative and Conjugative Elements. Research in Microbiology, 155, 376-386.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.012
[8]  Wallace, D.C. (2012) Mitochondria and Cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 12, 685-698.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3365
[9]  Weinberg, F., Hamanaka, R., Wheaton, W.W., Weinberg, S., Joseph, J., Lopez, M., et al. (2010) Mitochondrial Metabolism and ROS Generation Are Essential for Kras-Mediated Tumorigenicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 8788-8793.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003428107
[10]  Petros, J.A., Baumann, A.K., Ruiz-Pesini, E., Amin, M.B., Sun, C.Q., Hall, J., et al. (2005) mtDNA Mutations Increase Tumorigenicity in Prostate Cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 719-724.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408894102
[11]  Mullen, A.R., Wheaton, W.W., Jin, E.S., Chen, P.H., Sullivan, L.B., Cheng, T., et al. (2011) Reductive Carboxylation Supports Growth in Tumour Cells with Defective Mitochondria. Nature, 481, 385-388.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10642
[12]  Chure, G., Razo-Mejia, M., Belliveau, N.M., Einav, T., Kaczmarek, Z.A., Barnes, S.L., et al. (2019) Predictive Shifts in Free Energy Couple Mutations to Their Phenotypic Consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 18275-18284.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907869116
[13]  Daber, R. and Lewis, M. (2009) Towards Evolving a Better Repressor. Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, 22, 673-683.
https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzp051
[14]  O’Gorman, R.B., Rosenberg, J.M., Kallai, O.B., Dickerson, R.E., Itakura, K., Riggs, A.D., et al. (1980) Equilibrium Binding of Inducer to Lac Repressor. Operator DNA Complex. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 255, 10107-10114.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)70434-7
[15]  Raman, A.S., White, K.I. and Ranganathan, R. (2016) Origins of Allostery and Evolvability in Proteins: A Case Study. Cell, 166, 468-480.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.047
[16]  Ackers, G.K., Johnson, A.D. and Shea, M.A. (1982) Quantitative Model for Gene Regulation by Lambda Phage Repressor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 79, 1129-1133.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.4.1129
[17]  Sharma, P. (2022) Fokker-Planck Equations, Entropy Production and Entropy Generation: A Review. Research Trends and Challenges in Physical Science, 7, 61-68.
https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/rtcps/v7/3346E
[18]  Sharma, P. (2021) The Impact of Mutations: The Future of Cancer. ScienceOpen Preprints.
[19]  Sharma, P., Hallford, R., Capotosto, S. and Smoot, B. (2020) Non-Equilibrium Entropy of Cancer Based on Gompertzian Growth. Biophysical Journal, 118, 451A.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.2514
[20]  Capotosto, S., Smoot, B., Hallford, R. and Sharma, P. (2019) Entropy Production, Entropy Generation, and Fokker-Planck Equations for Cancer Cell Growth. Physics, 1, 147-153.
https://doi.org/10.3390/physics1010014
[21]  Copling, S. and Sharma, P. (2018) The Impact of Mutations: The Future of Cancer. Journal of Electrocardiology, 51, S83-S87.
[22]  Houck, P.D. (2020) Making Drug Discovery More Efficient Applying Statistical Entropy to Biology. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 1969-1976.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.1112124

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133