全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于“三全育人”理念的研究生培养质量评价方法研究——以交通运输专业研究生为例
Research on the Evaluation Method of Postgraduate Cultivation Quality Based on the Concept of “Three Comprehensive Education”—Taking Postgraduates Majoring in Transportation as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/AE.2022.127377, PP. 2478-2483

Keywords: 研究生培养质量评价,交通运输,三全育人
Quality Evaluation of Postgraduate Cultivation
, Transportation, Three Comprehensive Education

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

近年来国内民航业发展迅速,大量人才涌入民航院校,通过考取研究生学位进入民航企业,但是研究生的质量却并不能让行业完全满意,因此制定面向民航方向研究生培养质量评价方法,对于提高交通运输专业研究生培养质量具有重要意义。文章结合“三全育人”思想,构建了以知识、能力、素质为核心,对学生思想政治素质、科研能力、创新能力、应变能力等进行综合考核的综合评价体系。根据“三全育人”的要求,高校要将“立德树人”作为立身之本,“全员、全过程、全方位育人”,实现育人主体、时间、空间三个维度的有效协同,充分提高研究生的培养质量。建立评价指标体系,通过层次分析法和模糊综合评价方法进行评价,得出交通运输专业研究生培养质量评价结果,分析如何达到提高研究生综合素质的目的。
In recent years, the domestic civil aviation industry has developed rapidly, and many talents have poured into civil aviation colleges and universities. They have entered civil aviation enterprises by obtaining postgraduate degrees. However, the quality of postgraduates cannot fully satisfy the industry. The training quality of postgraduates majoring in transportation is of great significance. Combining with the idea of “three comprehensive education”, the article builds a comprehensive evaluation system that takes knowledge, ability, and quality as the core, and conducts a comprehensive assessment of students’ ideological and political quality, scientific research ability, innovation ability, and adaptability. According to the requirements of “three comprehensive education”, colleges and universities should take “cultivating people with morality” as their foundation, “educate people with all staff, whole process and allround”, so as to realize the effective education of people in the three dimensions of subject, time and space. Collaborate to fully improve the quality of postgraduate training. The evaluation index system is established, and the evaluation results are obtained through the analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to obtain the evaluation results of the postgraduate training quality of transportation, and study how to improve the comprehensive quality of the postgraduates.

References

[1]  张东明, 李亚东, 黄宏伟. 面向一流人才培养的研究生教育质量评价方法初探——基于层次分析与模糊综合评判的指标体系研究[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2020(2): 60-67.
[2]  季景玉, 祝鸿, 孙传良, 周鹏. 构建“三全育人”工作体系促进研究生全面发展[J]. 药学教育, 2016, 32(3): 45-47+63.
[3]  于天奇. 立德树人视阈下高校“三全育人”的创新路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2019.
[4]  王传毅, 乔刚. 省域研究生教育质量评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2017(1): 58-65.
[5]  乔刚, 付鸿飞. 我国学术型硕士研究生教育质量评价研究: 基于在读研究生的视角[J]. 研究生教育研究, 2016(5): 60-65
[6]  沈少博. 研究生综合素质评价体系的构建研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2017(10): 35-39.
[7]  宋微. 多元主体视角下研究生教育质量评价体系探索[J]. 黑龙江教育(高教研究与评估), 2020(6): 74-76.
[8]  范林榜, 邵朝霞. 基于流程管理的研究生培养质量评价体系研究[J]. 上海教育评估研究, 2018, 7(1): 32-36.
[9]  程安林, 张俊俊. 专业学位研究生培养质量评价要素体系研究[J]. 高等农业教育, 2019(4): 95-98.
[10]  宫新栋, 杨平, 尹佟明, 孙学江. “双一流”建设背景下研究生培养质量保障体系构建研究: 以南京林业大学为例[J]. 煤炭高等教育, 2018, 36(5): 95-99.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133