|
Nursing Science 2022
动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的Meta分析
|
Abstract:
目的:系统评价动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者的康复效果。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方(WanFang)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普(VIP)四个中文数据库和PubMed、Web of Science、the Cochrane Library、Embase四个英文数据库中关于动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的随机对照研究,检索时限为从建库2022年2月13日。由2名研究员独立进行文献检索、筛选、资料提取、质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3软件对最终所得文献进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入9篇文献,包括1011例患者。Meta分析结果显示动机性访谈时延续性护理可有效提高NIHSS评分[MD = ?1.85, 95%CI (?2.07, ?1.63), P < 0.00001],ADL评分[MD = ?8.47, 95%CI (?10.51, ?6.43), P < 0.00001]、QLI评分[MD = 2.05, 95%CI (1.66, 2.43), P < 0.00001]。结论:动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者干预康复疗效明确,可显著促进患者神经功能的恢复,提高日常生活能力,改善生活质量。
Objective: To systematically evaluate the rehabilitation effect of motivational interview type continuing nursing for patients with stroke. Methods: Four Chinese databases, CNKI, WanFang, CBM and VIP, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane, were searched by computer a randomized controlled study on the rehabilitation effect of motivational interviewing type continuing care for stroke patients in four English databases, Library and Embase, was retrieved from the database construction to February 13, 2022. Two researchers independently conducted literature retrieval, screening, data extraction and quality evaluation, and meta-analysis of the final literature was con-ducted by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 9 articles were included, including 1011 patients. Meta-analysis showed that continuous care could effectively improve NIHSS score during motiva-tional interview [MD = -1.85, 95%CI (?2.07, ?1.63), P < 0.00001], ADL score [MD = ?8.47, 95%CI (?10.51, ?6.43), P < 0.00001], and QLI score [MD = 2.05, 95% CI (1.66, 2.43), P < 0.00001]. Conclu-sion: Motivational interview type continuous nursing has a clear therapeutic effect on the interven-tion rehabilitation of stroke patients, which can significantly improve and promote the recovery of patients’ neurological function, improve the ability of daily living, and improve the quality of life.
[1] | 湖北省脑卒中防治中心科普宣教专家组, 湖北省脑血管病防治学会. 脑卒中防治科普宣教专家共识[J]. 卒中与神经疾病, 2021, 28(6): 713-718. |
[2] | 编写组中国脑卒中防治报告. 《中国脑卒中防治报告2019》概要[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2020, 17(5): 272-281. |
[3] | Camicia, M., Lutz, B.J. and Theodore, B.R. (2022) The Preparedness As-sessment for the Transition Home after Stroke Predicts Key Domains of Caregiver Health. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2022.2038835 |
[4] | 张娜, 高淑瑞, 梁海云, 等. 康复训练联合雷火灸在改善脑卒中后患侧上肢痉挛中的应用效果[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2018, 24(15): 1821-1824. |
[5] | Duncan, P.W., Bush-nell, C.D., Jones, S.B., et al. (2020) Randomized Pragmatic Trial of Stroke Transitional Care: The Compass Study. Cir-culation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 13, e6285. |
[6] | Dogru, A., Ovayolu, N. and Ovayolu, O. (2019) The Effect of Motivational Interview Persons with Diabetes on Self-Management and Metabolic Variables. Journal of Paki-stan Medical Association, 69, 294-300. |
[7] | 谢艾伶. 动机性访谈对缺血性脑卒中患者抗血小板预防治疗依从性的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2018(6): 1041-1044. |
[8] | 董娜, 黄志玉. 社区康复护理对脑卒中后遗症患者生存质量及功能恢复的影响研究[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2017, 2(13): 13-14. |
[9] | McCall, W.V., Cohen, W., Reboussin, B., et al. (1999) Effects of Mood and Age on Quality of Life in Depressed Inpatients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 55, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(98)00204-3 |
[10] | Zhang, Z., Fang, Y., et al. (2017) A preliminary fMRI Study on Activiation Pattern and Functional Reorganization of Motor Cortex in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology & Neurosurgery, 17, 883. |
[11] | 王敏, 许培扬, 王小万, 等. Cochrane EPOC系统评价原始研究证据来源数据库及其检索策略分析[J]. 医学信息学杂志, 2008, 29(5): 13-19. |
[12] | 郑旭明. 探讨动机性访谈式延伸护理干预对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响[J]. 健康忠告, 2021, 17(17): 84. |
[13] | 袁晓丽, 翁媛英, 蔡珍飞, 等. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者抑郁情绪及生活质量的影响[J]. 中国基层医药, 2019, 26(17): 2162-2164. |
[14] | 苏畅, 王进菊, 孙法强, 等. 基于行动研究法的动机性访谈式康复延续护理模式对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2019, 25(10): 1280-1283. |
[15] | 廖红英. 动机性访谈式延伸护理在脑卒中患者康复中的应用效果[J]. 世界临床医学, 2019, 13(4): 259, 262. |
[16] | 苏真真, 张鸣艳. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2019, 6(86): 4-5. |
[17] | 李青芸. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响分析[J]. 医学信息(西安), 2017, 30(21): 93-94. |
[18] | 王侠. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对老年脑卒中康复的影响[J]. 河南医学高等专科学校学报, 2017, 29(5): 466-468. |
[19] | 李茜, 李晓杰, 王珊珊, 等. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复的作用[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9(11): 209-210. |
[20] | 刘玲, 敖莉, 张丹. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2016, 31(1): 72-75. |
[21] | Wu, Q., Cui, J., Xie, Y., et al. (2021) Outcomes of Ischemic Stroke and Associated Factors among Elderly Patients with Large-Artery Atherosclerosis: A Hospital-Based Follow-Up Study in China. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, Article ID: 642426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.642426 |
[22] | 刘谷秀. 连续性护理干预在脑卒中患者生活质量中的效果评价[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2013, 17(16): 137-139. |
[23] | 曹风霞. 康复护理工作者对脑卒中认知能力调查[J]. 国际医药卫生导报, 2015(15): 2273-2274, 2282. |
[24] | 龚丛芬, 王芳, 李真, 等. 动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2017, 2(33): 1, 8. |
[25] | Knoflach, M., Matosevic, B., Rucker, M., et al. (2012) Functional Recovery after Ischemic Stroke—A Matter of Age: Data from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Neurology, 78, 279-285.
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824367ab |
[26] | 刘先娟, 郭晓娟, 黄天然, 等. 出院电话随访式延续护理对脑卒中患者日常生活能力的影响[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2019, 35(15): 2374-2376. |
[27] | 张世兰. 动机性访谈干预对缺血性脑卒中患者生活行为的影响[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2014, 20(17): 42-43. |
[28] | 张金芳. 探讨动机性访谈式延伸护理对脑卒中患者康复效果的影响[J]. 中国社区医师, 2019, 35(32): 159-160. |
[29] | Gual, N., Pérez, L.M., Cas-tellano-Tejedor, C., et al. (2020) IMAGINE Study Protocol of a Clinical Trial: A Multi-Center, Investigator-Blinded, Randomized, 36-Month, Parallel-Group to Compare the Effectiveness of Motivational Interview in Rehabilitation of Old-er Stroke Survivors. BMC Geriatrics, 20, Article No. 321.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01694-6 |
[30] | 吕露露, 刘海娜, 王艳冬, 等. 动机性访谈在脑卒中病人自我管理中的实施及应用进展[J]. 全科护理, 2018, 16(6): 656-659. |