|
西方哲学的三次转向与启示
|
Abstract:
西方哲学关注的重点以及讨论的角度并非一成不变,在其发展过程中经历了三次转向,分别为从古希腊探究谁是物质世界第一本原的自然哲学转向抽象的、具有真理性的本体论的研究;随着时代的发展,对本体论的探索逐渐转向认识论的研究,即关于知识来源是否可靠的论述;而到了近代,哲学家力图用语言学的分析方法来论证哲学观点,使其更具说服力和生命力,即语言学的转变。通过对西方哲学的三次转向分析,我们发现西方哲学的重心是随着时代的发展而不断变化的,但始终以“人”为出发点。
The focus of western philosophy and the angle of discussion are not the same. In the course of its development, western philosophy has experienced three turns, respectively, from the ancient Greek exploration of who is the first original natural philosophy in the material world to the abstract and true ontological research; With the development of The Times, the exploration of ontology gradually turned to the study of epistemology, that is, the discussion on whether the source of knowledge is reliable; In modern times, philosophers tried to use linguistic analytical methods to prove philosophical views, making them more convincing and vital, that is, the change of linguistics. Through the analysis of the three turns of western philosophy, we find that the focus of western philosophy is constantly changing with the development of The Times, but it always takes “human” as the starting point.
[1] | 韩立坤. 拒斥与重建——中国近现代哲学中的形而上学观念研究[J]. 广东社会科学, 2017(1): 65-71. |
[2] | 曾蒙. 前苏格拉底时期的“诗哲之争”思想考察[J]. 学术探索, 2020(2): 41-48. |
[3] | 谢文郁. 从混沌之神到本源概念——早期希腊人的思维方式追踪[J]. 社会科学, 2014(12): 102-109. |
[4] | 姚卫群. 古代中希印哲学中的“有” “无”观念比较[J]. 世界哲学, 2021(3): 67-78+160. |
[5] | 李忠伟. 现象学与分析哲学融合进路中的自我问题研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(12): 26-47, 199-200. |
[6] | 贾江鸿. 笛卡尔的直观理论新探[J]. 现代哲学, 2011(2): 66-71. |
[7] | 江怡. 对《逻辑哲学论》的逆向式解读及其问题[J]. 哲学研究, 2021(11): 96-103+128. |
[8] | 郝苑. 逻辑冰峰上的人文主义——论石里克的科学人文主义思想[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2008, 30(6): 1-7+110. |