Constructivism is frequently met with objections, criticism and often equated with nihilism or relativism. Sometimes even blamed for what some would randomly picture as unwanted side effects of radicalism or of a progressivist era: such misconceptions are not only due to an imprecise grasp of the premises shared by the constructivist family of systems. The structure of media, political systems, and economic models, still up today impel societal understandings of knowledge on neo-positivistic grounds. The first part of this essay outlines such pressures while sketching how language and worldviews play critical roles in our knowledge construction. Focusing on recent mediatic events, this work advances displaying some essential limits regarding the construction of human knowledge. Though unavoidable, some of the distinguishing aspects regarding the nature of our narratives are then critically reviewed. Later, it is shown how a special kind of self-denial that certain sub-stories implicitly hold about their own narrative nature leaves us with clashing worldviews that eventually collide onto crisis. Finally, it’ll be argued that it’s precisely in this scenario where a constructivist depiction of social discourses may move us away from any adolescent intent of elucidating absolutes within mere heuristics, to the pragmatic need of arriving on satisfactory agreements between parties.
References
[1]
Ahola, S. (2017). Why (Not) Disagree? Human Values and the Readiness to Question Experts’ Views. Public Understanding of Science, 26, 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516637818
[2]
Al Rawi, A. (2021). Political Memes and Fake News Discourses on Instagram. Media and Communication, 9, 276-290. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3533
[3]
Aparicio, J., Cornejo, S., Lain, F., & Mallegas, P. (2021). Discursos Sociales Disonantes y la Reformulación Identitaria en un Centro Integral del Adulto Mayor de Quilicura. Revista Pensamiento Académico, 4, 41-58. https://doi.org/10.33264/rpa.202101-03
[4]
Aristotle (1959). Politics and Ethics. In T. Page, E. Capps, W. Rouse, L. Post, & E. Warmington (Eds.), Politics (pp. xii-xiv). Harvard University Press.
[5]
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). Preconceptions and Misconceptions. In The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View (pp. 152-154). Springer Science Business Media.
[6]
Baidlayeva, А. (2015). Language in the Context of the Theory of Social Reality of John Searle. ВестникКазНУ. Серияфилософии, культурологии и политологии, 52, 13-15.
[7]
Beth, E., & Piaget, J. (1966). Translator’s Introduction. In D. Davidson, J. Hintikka, G. Nuchelmans, & W. Salmon (Eds.), Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology (pp. xiii-xix). Springer Science Business Media.
[8]
Bińczyk, E. (2019). Constructivism in the Anthropocene. Unpublished Manuscript of a Scientific Research Grant on Environmental Rhetoric and Lethargy of the Anthropocene: Philosophical Analysis of Discourses (pp. 395-409). NCN, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland.
[9]
Blumer, H. (1986). The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism. In Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (pp. 1-60). University of California Press.
[10]
Bostrom, N. (2002). Observation Selection Effects. In R. Nozick (Ed.), Anthropic Bias, Observation and Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy (pp. 1-5). Routledge.
[11]
Boullier, H., Kotras, B., & Siles, I. (2021). Uncertain Knowledge. Studying “Truth” and “Conspiracies” in Digital Age. RESET, 10, 1-22.
[12]
Butler, J. (1997). Introduction on Linguistic Vulnerability. In Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (pp. 1-42). Routledge.
[13]
Cadwalladr, C. (2016). Google, Democracy and the Truth about Internet Search. The Guardian.
[14]
Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018). Revealed: 50 Million Facebook Profiles Harvested for Cambridge Analytica in Major Data Breach. The Guardian.
[15]
Cinelli, M., Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The Echo chamber Effect on Social Media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118, e2023301118.
[16]
Craik, K. (1966). Laws of Association. In S. Sherwood (Ed.), The Nature of Psychology: A Selection of Papers, Essays and Other Writings by the Late Kenneth Craik (p. 144). Cambridge University Press.
[17]
Feyerabend, P. (1993). Nineteen. In Against Method (3rd ed., pp. 238-251). Verso Books.
[18]
Fuchs, C. (2021). How Did Donald Trump Incite a Coup Attempt? TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 19, 246-251.
[19]
Gergen, K. (2007). La construcción social del conocimiento. In A. Estrada, & S. Diazgranados (Eds.), Construccionismo Social: Aportes para el Debate y la Práctica (pp. 218-219). Uniandes Ceso.
[20]
Gläser, J., & Velarde, K. S. (2018). Changing Funding Arrangements and the Production of Scientific Knowledge: Introduction to the Special Issue. Minerva, 56, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9344-6
[21]
Goodman, B. (2021). Amateur Content Creation as Compositional Practice: Viral Videos and Internet Memes in Online Participatory Culture. In Sonic Scope: New Approaches to Audiovisual Culture (pp. 2-40). Goldsmiths University of London.
[22]
Harambam, J. (2020). Contested Knowledge: Popular Incredulity towards Objective Truth Claims. In P. Knight, & M. Butter (Eds.), Conspiracy Theories, Contemporary Conspiracy Culture, Truth and Knowledge in an era of Epistemic Instability (pp. 210-212). Routledge.
[23]
Harambam, J. (2021). Against Modernist Illusions: Why We Need More Democratic and Constructivist Alternatives to Debunking Conspiracy Theories. Journal for Cultural Research, 25, 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2021.1886424
[24]
Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2015). Contesting Epistemic Authority: Conspiracy Theories on the Boundaries of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 466-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514559891
[25]
Harambam, J., Helberger, N., & Van Hoboken, J. (2018). Democratizing Algorithmic News Recommenders: How to Materialize Voice in a Technologically Saturated Media Ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, Article No. 20180088.
[26]
Harris, T. (2016). How Technology Hijacks People’s Minds—From a Magician and Google’s Design Ethicist. Medium Magazine.
[27]
Hebb, D. (2002). Differences between Early and Late Brain Injury. In The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory (pp. 289-294). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[28]
Hull, C. (1943). The Hypothesis of Neural Interaction. In Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory (pp. 42-44). Appleton-Century-Crofts Incorporated.
[29]
Kant, I. (1998). Preface to the Second Edition. In P. Guyer, & A. Wood (Eds.), Critique of Pure Reason (pp. 106-124). Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Klomp, J. (2020). The Arab Spring and the International Defense Market. Business and Politics, 1-19.
[31]
Koch, I., & Reeves, A. (2021). From Social Security to State-Sanctioned Insecurity: How Welfare Reform Mimics the Commodification of Labour through Greater State Intervention. Economy and Society, 50, 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1844936
[32]
Kuhn, T. (1996). The Nature of Normal Science. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap, & C. Morris (Eds.), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd edition, pp. 23-34). University of Chicago Press.
[33]
Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining Embodied Cognition Results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 773-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
[34]
Lange, M., & Monscheuer, O. (2021). Spreading the Disease: Protest in Times of Pandemics. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper 21-009.
[35]
Lanier, J. (2018). The Mysterious Nature of Asshole Amplification and Technology. In Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now (pp. 44-49). Henry Holt and Company.
[36]
Marres, N. (2018). Why We Can’t Have Our Facts Back. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 4, 423-443. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.188
[37]
Massarani, L., & Moreira, I. (2004). Popularization of Science: Historical Perspectives and Permanent Dilemmas. Quark, No. 32, 75-79.
[38]
Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without Agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
[39]
McLuhan, M., Fiore, Q., & Agel, J. (1967). You. In The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects (p. 12). Gingko Press.
[40]
Okri, B. (2015). Nine. In A Way of Being Free (p. 33). Head of Zeus.
[41]
Pavez, F. (2021). El Supuesto Declive del Construccionismo Social en la Psicología Social Crítica. Límite, RevistaInterdisciplinaria de Filosofía y Psicología, 16, 1-12.
[42]
Peters, B. (2021). Governing in a Time of Global Crises: The Good, the Bad, and the Merely Normal. Global Public Policy and Governance, 1, 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-021-00006-x
[43]
Peterson, J. (2002). Maps of Meaning: Three Levels of Analysis. In Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief (pp. 19-217). Taylor and Francis.
[44]
Piaget, J., & García, R. (1997). Orígenes epistemológicos del enfoque piagetiano de la lógica. In Hacia una Lógica de Significaciones (2nd ed., pp. 117-131). Gedisa.
[45]
Pieri, L. (2021). The Simplicity Assumption and Some Implications of the Simulation Argument for Our Civilization. OSF Preprints, Center for Open Science.
[46]
Plato (2006). Teeteto. Losada.
[47]
Putnam, H. (1975). Realism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, Volume I (pp. 69-75). Cambridge University Press.
[48]
Putnam, H. (2001). Meaning Is in Part a Normative Notion. In Representation and Reality (pp. 11-15). MIT Press.
[49]
Quine, W. (1986). Diffuseness of Empirical Meaning. In The Philosophy of Logic (2nd ed., pp. 5-7). Harvard University Press.
[50]
Russell, B. (2008). On Induction. In The Problems of Philosophy (pp. 28-33). Arc Manor.
[51]
Santos, F., Pinheiro, F., Lenaerts, T., & Pacheco, J. (2012). The Role of Diversity in the Evolution of Cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.09.003
[52]
Sepúlveda, D., Lavanchy, A., Heini, C., & Acevedo, A. (2021). Chile, October and November 2019: ‘Feel’ and Field-Work in Times of Crisis. Anthropology Today, 37, 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12644
[53]
Tarski, A. (1956). The Concept of True Sentence in Everyday or Colloquial Language. In J. Woodger (Translator), Logic, Semantics Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938 (pp. 154-165). Clarendon Press.
[54]
Uscinski, J. E., & Butler, R. W. (2013). The Epistemology of Fact Checking. Critical Review, 25, 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2013.843872
[55]
Vis, B. (2019). Heuristics and Political Elites’ Judgment and Decision-Making. Political Studies Review, 17, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917750311
[56]
Vygotsky, L (1999). Epilogue. In R. Rieber (Ed.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 6, Scientific Legacy (pp. 245-266). Plenum Publishers.
[57]
Williams, M. (2015). The Agrippan Problem, Then and Now. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 5, 80-106. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04031179
[58]
Wittgenstein, L. (1986). Part I. In G. Anscombe, R. Rhees, & G. Von Wright (Eds.), Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed., pp. 1-172). Basil Blackwell.
[59]
Zuboff, S. (2019). How Did They Get Away with It? In The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (pp. 313-320). Public Affairs.
