全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

On the Possibility of Integrating Psychoanalytic Theory and Dialectical Materialism
—Taking Zizek’s “Parallax Views” as the Text

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2022.123024, PP. 366-375

Keywords: Psychoanalysis, Dialectical Materialism, Zizek, “Parallax Views”

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

If Marx’s dialectical materialism reveals people’s psychological activities or self-consciousness as a product of social life, its essence is a reflection of production relations. Then the advent of Freud’s psychoanalytic theory seems to have completed a certain “reversal” of the dialectical materialist interpretation reducing human social activities to the “magnification” of individual psychological activities, and treating the historical development of human beings as individual the counterpart of psychological development. In this regard, the opposition and contradiction between the two theories have become a foregone conclusion. But in Žižek’s “Parallax Views”, he took a different approach and provided a different route to realize the possibility of the fusion of dialectical materialism and psychoanalytic theory. If the nature of the opposition between psychoanalysis and dialectical materialism is the opposition between the internal psychological mechanism and the external reality, then when Lacan’s psychoanalytic theory stops the desire for emptiness and lack in the realm of human spirit, Zizek The desire for emptiness and lack is promoted to the ontological basis of actual existence. Thus, psychoanalysis and dialectical materialist philosophy will become one and the same science—as a science that pays attention to the emptiness, lack, and rupture of the constitutive subject or object. This is the real possibility of the fusion of psychoanalytic theory and dialectical materialism.

References

[1]  Butler, J. (2017). Antigo the Appeal of Nirvana (p. 67). Henan University Press.
[2]  Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Žižek, S. (2004). Contingency, Hegemony and Universality [M]. Jiangsu People’s Publishing House, 319 p.
[3]  Clement, C. (1985a). Criticism of Psychoanalytic Theory by Marxism (p. 157). Commercial Press.
[4]  Clement, C. (1985b). The Marxist Criticism of Psychoanalytic Theory (p. 187). The Commercial Press.
[5]  Compilation Bureau of Works of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (1985). Anthology of Stalin’s Works 1934-1952 (p. 208). People’s Publishing House.
[6]  Macy, D., & Mai, Y. X. (1998). Using Borrowed Concepts: Althusser and Lacan. Aesthetic Research in Marxism, 418-438.
[7]  Miller, J.-A. (Ed.), & Sheridan, A. (Trans.) (1998). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan (Book XI, pp. 197-198). Norton.
[8]  Quinodo, J.-M. (2016). Understanding Freud (p. 348). Shanghai Translation Press.
[9]  Žižek, S. (2011). “Interview” in The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism (p. 407). Victoria Press.
[10]  Žižek, S. (2012). Less than Nothing (p. 60). Verso.
[11]  Žižek, S. (2014a). Enjoy Your Symptoms (p. 67)! Nanjing University Press.
[12]  Žižek, S. (2014b). Views on Parallax (p. 44). Zhejiang University Press.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133