全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Intermediary Organization of Administrative Examination and Approval: Development and Alienation

DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2022.104110, PP. 2181-2190

Keywords: Intermediary Organization of Administrative Examination and Approval, Reform of Administrative Examination and Approval System, Delegating Power, Strengthening Regulation, Improving Government Services, Government Functional Transformation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

In the reform of the administrative examination and approval system, intermediary organizations have “sprung up” and played an important role in undertaking the decentralization of power by the government and providing professional examination and approval services. However, in practice, some intermediary organizations have become “two governments” in the process of administrative examination and approval, which not only damages the power and authority of the government, but also increases the burden on citizens and enterprises, making it difficult to give full play to the reform dividends of the administrative examination and approval system. Based on this, this paper takes the development and alienation of administrative examination and approval intermediary organizations in Tianjin and Zhejiang Province as research cases, aiming to explore the development status and alienation of intermediary organizations in the process of administrative examination and approval system reform, and provide policy reference for the standardized development of administrative examination and approval intermediary organizations on this basis.

References

[1]  Dong, W. (2003). Dual Attribute Analysis of Administrative Approval. China Administration, 12, 89-92.
[2]  Sun, X. L., & Li, G. D. (2016). Hongding Intermediary: Alienation and Return. China Party and Government Cadres Forum, 5, 23-26.
[3]  Wang, J. (2001). Some Thoughts on the Reform of Administrative Examination and Approval System. Journal of Guangdong University of Administration, 6, 9-13.
[4]  Wang, K. W. (2015). On the Classified Reform of Administrative Examination and Approval and the Construction of Alternative Systems. Chinese Law, 2, 5-28.
[5]  Wu, X. L. (2017). Structure Is Still Valid: Towards the “Structure Process” Analysis Paradigm of Political and Social Research. Political Science Research, 2, 96-108.
[6]  Xiong, X. B., & Li, G. D. (2002). Building a New Administrative Examination and Approval System. Zhongzhou Journal, 4, 186-189.
[7]  Zhang, Y. T. (2003). Administration. Higher Education Press.
[8]  Zhu, G. L. (2008). Modern Government Theory (p. 6). Higher Education Press.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133