全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Scientific Medicine in the Age of the Pandemic: Framing the Debate against a Background of Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda and Groundless Opinions

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2022.123023, PP. 360-365

Keywords: Pandemic Period, Scientific Data, Scientific Medicine, Health Policies, Depoliticization of Science

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a huge impact on the world of science. On one hand, it has spurred renewed research activity in the field of health and medicine, with increased investment by public and private sectors alike, leading to the development of new treatments and the generation of large quantities of data, enabling epidemiological studies on a scale rarely seen before. On the other hand, the pandemic has drawn attention to the role of scientists and research in modern society, highlighting their uneasy relationship with politicians, traditional and digital media and the wider public. The enormous scientific progress made since the start of the pandemic has been overshadowed, and in some cases compromised, by the failure to properly communicate the results of scientific research to the citizens and the failure of governments to make the best use of those results in terms of adopting the right policies. The result is that the standing of scientists in society has been undermined, with governments pursuing populist notions of “freedom” (in opposition to calls for lockdowns by public health experts), while social media platforms enable the propagation of fake cures, conspiracy theories and vilification of individual scientists. The solution lies in the depoliticisation of science, which needs to be properly funded while respecting the principle of freedom of scientific endeavour, such freedom being at the heart of traditional liberal ethical values. This approach is best pursued on a European level, as exemplified by the work of the European Research Council.

References

[1]  Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., & Renzo, M. (2015). The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights: An Overview. In R. Cruft, S. M. Liao, & M. Renzo (Eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights (pp. 1-41). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.003.0001
[2]  European Research Council (ERC) (2021) ERC Scientific Council 82nd Plenary Meeting 21-22 October 2021, Videoconference Minutes. European Research Council.
[3]  Pagel C., & Yates C. A. (2021). Tackling the Pandemic with (Biased) Data. Data Are Crucial for Understanding and Addressing the Pandemic, but There Are Pitfalls. Science, 374, 403-404.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6602
[4]  Schiermeier Q. (2021). Politicians Shouldn’t Meddle: New Chief of Europe’s Major Research Funder Shares Priorities. Nature, 598, 553 p.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02885-w

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133