|
记账利率与缴费比例对企业职工养老保险精算平衡的影响研究
|
Abstract:
根据我国企业职工养老保险制度规定,基于生命周期理论视角,建立企业职工养老保险基金缴费与给付精算模型。研究记账利率在3%~8%之间,男职工和女职工养老保险基金缴费与给付变化情况;以及不同缴费比例的省份,在不同记账利率下男女职工养老保险基金收支变化情况。通过精算模型测算,得出以下结论:记账利率对养老保险基金缴费与给付的影响显著;通过调整记账利率,能够实现不同缴费比例职工养老保险基金精算平衡。人社部已经对外宣称,2022年1月起启动企业职工养老保险全国统筹,若统一企业缴费费率为16%,当60岁退休男性记账利率为6.3%~6.4%,55岁退休女性记账利率为6.8%~6.9%,50岁退休女性记账利率提高至7.1%~7.2%时,可以实现养老保险基金精算平衡;若实现不同缴费比例的男职工养老保险基金精算平衡,记账利率处于6%~7%较为适宜;若实现不同缴费比例的50岁和55岁退休女职工养老保险基金精算平衡,记账利率7%左右较为合适。
Based on the perspective of individual life cycle, this paper establishes an actuarial model for the payment and payment of the enterprise employee pension insurance fund according to the regulations of the enterprise employee endowment insurance system in China. The paper is to study the changes in the payment and payment of male and female employees’ endowment insurance funds when the bookkeeping interest rate is between 3% and 8%; and the changes in the income and expenditure of male and female employees’ endowment insurance funds under different bookkeeping rates in provinces with different payment ratios. Through the calculation of the actuarial model, the following conclusions are drawn: the bookkeeping interest rate has a significant impact on the payment and payment of the pension insurance fund; by adjusting the bookkeeping interest rate, the actuarial balance of the pension insurance fund for employees with different payment ratios can be achieved. The Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security has announced that the national coordination of enterprise employee endowment insurance will be launched in January 2022. If the unified enterprise payment rate is 16%, the accounting interest rate for retired men at the age of 60 is 6.3%~6.4%, and the retirement rate for retired women at the age of 55 is 6.3%~6.4%. When the accounting interest rate is 6.8%~6.9%, and the accounting interest rate for 50-year-old retired women increases to 7.1%~7.2%, the personal endowment insurance can achieve actuarial balance; it is more appropriate for the account interest rate to be around 6% to 7%; if the income and expenditure of the pension insurance fund for retired female employees aged 50 and 55 with different contribution ratios is realized, the account interest rate of about 7% is more appropriate.
[1] | 薛惠元, 舒怡, 万诗雨. 海外养老保险研究进展与启示[J]. 四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(5): 48-67. |
[2] | 杨一心. 职工基本养老保险个人账户长寿风险及其估计[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(3): 224-239. |
[3] | 彭浩然. 中国基本养老保险个人账户的改革方向——基于个人账户改革四次争论的思考[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2021(2): 160-168. |
[4] | 董克用, 孙博, 张栋. “名义账户制”是我国养老金改革的方向吗——瑞典“名义账户制”改革评估与借鉴[J]. 社会保障研究, 2016(4): 3-6. |
[5] | 杨再贵. 现阶段背景下企业职工基本养老保险最优缴费率与最优记账利率研究[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2018, 57(1): 55-64. |
[6] | 米海杰, 王晓军, 王述珍. 养老保险个人账户参数设定错误与纠正[J]. 统计研究, 2019, 36(6): 68-80. |
[7] | 岳磊. 养老个人账户记账利率调高的背后[J]. 金融博览(财富), 2017(16): 69-71. |
[8] | 刘伟奇. 记账利率视域下我国养老保险个人账户管理探讨[J]. 市场研究, 2019(8): 36-37. |
[9] | 秦森, 杨艳. 关于个人账户记账利率的研究[J]. 中国社会保障, 2019(1): 36-37. |
[10] | 郝勇, 周敏, 郭丽娜. 适度的养老保险保障水平: 基于弹性的养老金替代率的确定[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2010, 27(8): 74-87. |
[11] | 郑秉文. 养老保险降低缴费率与扩大个人账户——征缴体制改革的“额外收获”[J]. 行政管理改革, 2018(11): 12-21. |
[12] | 孙雅娜, 边恕, 穆怀中. 中国养老保险最优缴费率的实证分析——基于贴现因子和劳动增长率差异的分析[J]. 当代经济管理, 2009, 31(7): 69-72. |
[13] | 穆怀中, 陈洋, 陈曦. 基础养老保险缴费率膨胀系数研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2015(12): 44-54. |
[14] | 路锦非. 合理降低我国城镇职工基本养老保险缴费率的研究——基于制度赡养率的测算[J]. 公共管理学报, 2016, 13(1): 128-140+159. |
[15] | 曾益, 姚金. 降低养老保险缴费率: “一举两得”抑或“得不偿失”?——基于缴费遵从度与基金可持续的视角[J]. 南方经济, 2022(1): 19-34. |
[16] | 张冉. 缴费率下调对养老保险基金可持续性的影响研究——基于文献综述的分析[J]. 劳动保障世界, 2020(20): 39-40. |
[17] | 汪润泉, 鲁於, 杨翠迎. 养老保险降费何以可能?——基金平衡视角下的精算分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2019, 25(4): 23-33. |
[18] | 刘长庚, 张松彪. 我国企业职工基本养老保险制度中企业缴费率应降低[J]. 经济纵横, 2014(12): 112-115. |
[19] | 杨再贵, 陈肖华. 降费综合方案下企业职工基本养老保险财政风险预警[J]. 保险研究, 2021(1): 91-106. |
[20] | 刘桂莲. 现收现付养老保险制度可持续发展调整机制比较研究——以瑞典、德国和日本为例[J]. 社会保障研究, 2016(5): 89-97. |
[21] | 董纪昌, 孔倩, 周晨丹. 基于缴费率调整的养老保险制度可持续运行能力分析[J]. 商业研究, 2013(7): 15-20. |
[22] | 唐莉霞, 李红艳. 缴费年限对个人缴费与养老金待遇平衡的影响研究[J]. 西北人口, 2019, 40(4): 68-78. |
[23] | 张翔, 郑阳雨璐, 杨一心. 职工基本养老保险个人账户利差损研究[J]. 公共管理报, 2021, 18(2): 115-127+173. |