|
|
心脑血管病联合防治体系的建立对脑梗死患者临床转归的影响
|
Abstract:
目的：探究心脑血管病联合防治体系对急性脑梗死患者临床转归的影响。方法：选取2021年1月~2021年6月在我院进行治疗的210例急性脑梗死患者，随机将其分为常规组及体系组，对常规组实施常规治疗，对体系组在常规治疗基础上按联合体系流程进行诊治，比较两组临床转归情况。结果：干预前，两组的mRS评分无统计学差异(P > 0.05)，干预后，体系组mRS评分为(1.8 ± 0.82)分，显著优于常规组及干预前(P < 0.05)。干预前两组的生活质量综合评定表(QOL)评分无统计学差异(P > 0.05)，干预后，体系组的评分为(32.9 ± 3.62)，显著优于常规组(27.7 ± 4.23)及干预前(25.6 ± 3.36)，(P < 0.05)。结论：心脑血管病联合防治体系的建立能够提高急性脑梗死患者的预后，值得推广。
Objective: To explore the effect of combined prevention and treatment system of cardio-cerebro- vascular diseases on clinical outcome of patients with acute cerebral infarction. Methods: 210 pa-tients with acute cerebral infarction treated in our hospital from January 2021 to June 2021 were selected and randomly divided into routine group and systematic group. Routine treatment was carried out in the routine group, and diagnosis and treatment was carried out in the systematic group on the basis of routine treatment according to the combined system process, and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results: Before intervention, there was no significant difference in mRS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After intervention, mRS score of the systematic group was (1.8 ± 0.82), which was significantly better than that of the conventional group and before intervention (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in QOL score between the two groups before intervention (P > 0.05). After intervention, the score of systematic group was (32.9 ± 3.62), which was significantly better than that of conventional group (27.7 ± 4.23) and be-fore intervention (25.6 ± 3.36) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The establishment of combined prevention and treatment system of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases can improve the prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction, and it is worth promoting.
| [1] | Guzik, A. and Bushnell, C. (2017) Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management. Continuum, 23, 15.
https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000416 |
| [2] | Kwakkel, G., Winters, C., Van Wegen, E.E., et al. (2016) Effects of Unilateral Upper Limb Training in Two Distinct Prognostic Groups Early after Stroke: The Explicit-Stroke Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30, 804-816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315624784 |
| [3] | Mierzewska-Schmldt, M. and Gawecka, A. (2015) Neurogenic Stunned Myoca Rdium？Do We Consider This Diagnosis in Patients with Acute Central Nervous System Injury and Acute Heart Failure? Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 47, 175-180. https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2015.0017 |
| [4] | 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018 [J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 666-682. |
| [5] | Flnsterer, J. and Stol Lberger, C. (2016) IS Autonomous Neuropathy Responsible for Takotsubo Syndrome? International Journal of Cardiology, 209, 339-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.144 |
| [6] | 黄帅金, 白雪. 脑心综合征的研究进展[J]. 湖南中医杂志, 2014, 30(5): 146-149. |
| [7] | 钟晓闵, 蒋晗. 103例急性脑血管病患者的心电图改变与预后相关性分析[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 18(12): 20-21. |
| [8] | Pereira, V.H., Marques, P., Magalhaes, R., et al. (2016) Central Auto-nomic Nervous System Response to Autonomic Challenges Is Altered in Patients with a Previous Episode of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care, 5, 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872615568968 |
| [9] | 姜嘟嘟, 金国华, 顾勤, 等. 卒中合并脑心综合征临床研究进展[J]. 神经病学与神经康复学杂志, 2017, 13(4): 227-232. |
| [10] | 王晓莉, 张维文, 孟伟建, 等. rt-PA溶栓治疗合并脑心综合征的急性脑梗死47例[J]. 山东医药, 2015, 55(47): 60-61. |
| [11] | Reiken, S., Wehrens, X.H., Vest, J.A., et al. (2003) Beta-Blockers Restore Calcium Release Channel Function and Improve Cardiac Muscle Performance in Human Heart Failure. Circulation, 107, 2459-2466.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000068316.53218.49 |
| [12] | 祝艳芳, 杜业亮, 周丽, 等. 普萘洛尔对急性脑梗死致脑心综合征大鼠血浆皮质醇(酮)的影响[J]. 潍坊医学院学报, 2016, 38(3): 178-180. |
| [13] | 张玲. 前列地尔在急性脑梗死并发脑心综合征中的应用价值[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2016, 19(17): 9-11. |
| [14] | 金国华, 孟凡萍, 王丽晶, 等. 康复治疗对急性脑卒中合并心电图异常患者的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2016, 32(20): 3419-3421. |
