全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

An Analysis of MRI-Fusion Prostate Biopsy Results in PI-RADS 3 MRI Findings in a Cohort of Men in a Community Hospital Setting

DOI: 10.4236/oju.2022.126034, PP. 357-365

Keywords: MeSH Headings: Prostate, Neoplasms, Diagnosis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: With the advent of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), clinicians added an important tool for helping to decide whether a man should undergo a prostate biopsy. The MRI PI-RADS system stratifies the risk of finding cancer on prostate biopsy. PI-RADS 3 lesions often prove to be a diagnostic challenge, and many men are advised not to proceed with a biopsy based on this finding. The goal of our paper was to evaluate the likelihood of finding cancer of clinical significance in this group. Methods: A retrospective 4-year data and quality analysis was performed of 312 evaluable men undergoing prostate MRI. Of the subset with scores of PI-RADS 3 who underwent biopsy (N = 32), 100 percent were biopsied using an MRI-guided fusion technique, greatly raising the likelihood that the MRI lesion was, in fact, the area sampled. Results: A total of 34% of the men with PI-RADS 3 lesions were found to have Grade Group ≥ 1, with 15.6 % demonstrating Grade Group ≥ 2. In the men with cancer, we analyzed and report the relationship to age, ethnicity, PSA density, and the presence or absence of cribriform findings. Conclusions: We found that many men with PI-RADS 3 findings on multiparametric MRI do, in fact, have clinically significant prostate cancer. We suggest that many factors (such as rate of rise of PSA over time, family history, and rectal examination findings) be considered in addition to the MRI PI-RADS score to advise whether or not to proceed with a biopsy of the prostate. Our findings, from a single, large, community hospital with a diverse ethnic makeup, parallel the findings of large trials done at academic centers of excellence. This demonstrates that comparable diagnostic mpMRI/biopsy quality may be found in the community setting.

References

[1]  PI-RADS—Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (2019) Version 2.1. The American College of Radiology, the European Society for Urologic Radiology and the AdMeTech Foundation.
https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/Pi-RADS/PIRADS-V2-1.pdf
[2]  Kasivasvanathan, V., Rannikko, A.S., Borghi, M., et al. (2018) MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378, 1767-1777.
[3]  Eklund, M., Jaderling, F., Discacciati, A., et al. (2021) MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Screening. The New England Journal of Medicine, 385, 908-920.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100852
[4]  Lee, A.Y.M., Chen, K., Law, Y.M., et al. (2021) Robot-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted Biopsy. Urology, 155, 46.
[5]  Clinical Research Review Committee, Lowell General Hospital, a Member of Tufts Medicine, Lowell, MA.
[6]  Chen, Z., Pham, H., Abreu, A., et al. (2021) Prognostic Value of Cribriform Size, Percentage, and Intraductal Carcinoma in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer with Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4. Human Pathology, 118, 18-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2021.09.005
[7]  Bruno, S., Falagario, U., D’Altilia, N., et al. (2021) PSA Density Help to Identify Patients with Elevated PSA due to Prostate Cancer Rather Than Intraprostatic Inflammation: A Prospective Single Center Study. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, Article 693684.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.693684
[8]  Yanai, Y., Kosaka, T., Hongo, H., et al. (2018) Evaluation of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging before Biopsy in Men Aged 70 Years and Older with Elevated PSA. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 9, 656-660.
https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2018.1725
[9]  Osses, D.F., Arsov, C., Schimmoller, L., Schoots, I.G., Van Lenders, G.J.L.H., Esposito, I., Remmers S., et al. (2020) Equivocal PI-RADS Three Lesions on Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Risk Statification Strategies to Avoid MRI-Targeted Biopsies. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 10, Article 270.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040270
[10]  Park, K.J., Choi, S.H., Lee, J.S., et al. (2020) Interreader Agreement with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Urology, 204, 661-670.
https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001200
[11]  Liddell, H., Jyoti, R. and Haxhimolla, H.Z. (2014) mpMRI Prostate Characterized PIRADS 3 Lesions Are Associated with a Low Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer-A Retrospective Review of 92 Biopsied PIRADS 3 Lesions. Current Urology, 8, 96-100.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000365697
[12]  Sheridan, A.D., Nath, S.K., Syed, J.S., et al. (2018) Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology, 210, 347-357.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18516
[13]  Schoots, I.G. (2018) MRI in Early Prostate Cancer Detection: How to Manage Indeterminate or Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions? Translational Andrology and Urology, 7, 70-82.
https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.12.31
[14]  Tapia, M.F., Labra, A., Adlerstein, I., Olivares, J.P., Schultz, M., Silva, C., et al. (2019) Densidad de APE en pacientes PI-RADS 3. Un parámetro clínico útil para su manejo. Revista Chilena de Radiología, 25, 119-127.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-93082019000400119

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133