全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

四种保鲜膜对生菜贮藏品质的影响
Effects of Four Preservative Film Packaging on Storage Quality of Postharvest Lettuce

DOI: 10.12677/HJFNS.2022.112019, PP. 157-166

Keywords: 生菜,品质,保鲜膜,失重率,可溶性固形物,维生素C,叶绿素
Lettuce
, Quality, Preservative Film, Weight Loss Rate, Soluble Solid Content, Vitamin C, Chlorophyll

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

研究聚乙烯(PE)、聚乳酸(PLA)、聚氯乙烯(PVC)、偏氯乙烯氯乙烯共聚物(VDC/VC)四种材质的保鲜膜对采后生菜常温贮藏期间品质的影响。以无膜包装作为对照,通过定期测量不同保鲜处理下的生菜失重率、可溶性固形物含量、维生素C含量、叶绿素a含量、叶绿素b含量和总叶绿素含量的变化趋势对比出不同保鲜膜对生菜贮藏品质的影响。实验发现VDC/VC材质的保鲜膜能更有效地抑制采后生菜的水分流失及变质腐烂速度,该处理下的生菜在d 6时的感官评分为7分,失重率为2.47%,均优于无膜对照组;PVC及VDC/VC材质保鲜膜能更有效地维持采后生菜叶绿素的含量变化,在第6 d时,PVC处理下的生菜叶绿素a、b及总叶绿素含量分别为0.045 mg/g、0.016 mg/g、0.061 mg/g均高于其余4种不同保鲜处理下的生菜叶绿素含量;PLA材质的保鲜膜能更好地将VC含量保持在较高水平,其中在6 d时,该处理下的生菜VC含量有2.80 mg/g均大于其余3组不同包装材料的实验组;PLA保鲜膜能更有效地稳定生菜可溶性固形物含量的变化,在第4~6 d时,PLA包装组变化幅度均为0.5%小于其余实验组。结果表明有保鲜膜包装比无保鲜膜包装更能延长采后生菜的货架期及商品价值。
The effects of polyethylene (PE), polylactic acid (PLA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and vinylidene chloride-vinyl/chloride copolymer (VDC/VC) on the quality of postharvest lettuce during room temperature storage were studied. With no-film packaging as the control, the effects of different preservative films on the storage quality of lettuce were compared by periodically measuring the variation trends of weight loss rate, soluble solid content, vitamin C content, chlorophyll a content, chlorophyll b content and total chlorophyll content of lettuce under different preservation treatments. It was found that the VDC/VC fresh-keeping film could more effectively inhibit the water loss and decay rate of postharvest lettuce. The sensory score of lettuce under this treatment at d 6 was 7 points, and the weight loss rate was 2.47 %, which were better than those of the control group without film. PVC and VDC/VC fresh-keeping films could more effectively maintain the changes in chlorophyll content of postharvest lettuce. On the sixth day, the chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll contents of lettuce treated with PVC were 0.045 mg/g, 0.016 mg/g and 0.061 mg/g, respectively, which were higher than those of lettuce treated with four different fresh-keeping treatments. The fresh-keeping film made of PLA could better maintain the VC content at a high level, and at d 6, the VC content of lettuce under this treatment was 2.80 mg/g, which was higher than that of the three groups of different packaging materials. PLA fresh-keeping film could more effectively stabilize the change of soluble solid content in lettuce. On the 4th-6th days, the change range of PLA packaging group was 0.5% less than that of the experimental group. The results showed that the shelf life and commodity value of postharvest lettuce with preservative film packaging were longer than those

References

[1]  孟祥慧, 马鑫敏, 谷恒梅, 等. 超声-次氯酸钠-植酸联合处理提高鲜切生菜的保鲜效果[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(19): 336-341.
[2]  高利伟, 成升魁, 曹晓昌, 等. 食物损失和浪费研究综述及展望[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(3): 523-536.
[3]  Munesue, Y., Masui, T. and Fushima, T. (2015) The Effects of Reducing Food Losses and Food Waste on Global Food Insecurity, Natural Resources, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Environmental Economics & Policy Studies, 17, 43-77.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-014-0083-0
[4]  夏春丽, 高丽朴, 王清, 等. 蔬菜保鲜膜的应用研究进展[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2018, 18(5): 166-173.
[5]  李莉, 刘超超, 李蕾, 等. 我国水果包装现状及问题启示[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2016, 16(2): 105-107.
[6]  戴晋, 张运栋, 秦素研. 果蔬保鲜膜应用及前景[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(3): 89-91.
[7]  贾旭, 彭新晶, 王冰, 等. 塑料食品包装对环境的影响及对策探讨[J]. 中国环境管理, 2006(2): 35-37.
[8]  Avinc, O. and Khoddami, A. (2010) Overview of Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA) Fiber: Part II: Wet Processing; Pretreatment, Dyeing, Clearing, Finishing, and Washing Properties of Poly(Lactic Acid) Fibres. Fibre Chemistry, 42, 68-78.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10692-010-9226-7
[9]  侯哲. 聚乳酸可降解塑料食品包装研究进展及其设计应用[J]. 塑料科技, 2018, 46(6): 131-134.
[10]  郝义, 纪淑娟, 韩英群, 等. 不同PE保鲜膜对甜樱桃果实贮藏性的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2007, 28(9): 141-144.
[11]  赵春燕, 王淑琴, 刘诗阳, 等. 不同保鲜膜对嫩鲜蒜保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(4): 318-321+359.
[12]  罗毅诚, 李亚娜, 罗瑞芬. PLA和PE包装袋对西兰花贮藏品质的影响[J]. 包装工程, 2018, 39(3): 12-15.
[13]  姚军, 耿新丽, 再吐娜?买买提, 等. 不同保鲜膜、保鲜剂处理对甜瓜贮藏品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19): 58-63.
[14]  郝梅梅, 陈兰, 刘海娇. 不同保鲜膜包装对低温储藏铁皮石斛的保鲜效果影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2014, 34(2): 22-24.
[15]  吕群. 偏氯乙烯共聚树脂的制备与应用进展[J]. 化工进展, 1999, 18(4): 38-40.
[16]  普红梅, 杨芳, 张绍智, 等. 不同保鲜袋对意大利生菜的保鲜效果[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2020, 11(12): 3880-3886.
[17]  闫震, 聂继云, 程杨, 等. 水果、蔬菜及其制品中叶绿素含量的测定[J]. 中国果树, 2018(2): 59-62+72.
[18]  聂继云, 李静, 徐国锋, 等. 水果可溶性固形物含量测定适宜取汁方法的筛选[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2014, 14(5): 62-64.
[19]  高海荣, 赵爱娟, 王睿颖, 等. 紫外法快速测定中原地区12种蔬菜VC含量[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(6): 1131-1133+1136.
[20]  Zhan, L.J., Hu, J.Q., Ai, Z.L., et al. (2013) Light Exposure during Storage Preserving Soluble Sugar and L-Ascorbic Acid Content of Minimally Processed Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Longifolia). Food Chemistry, 136, 273-278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.123

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133