全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

网络群体性事件中舆情热度的影响机制及治理路径研究——基于多案例的定性比较分析
Influence Mechanism and Governance Path of Public Opinion Heat in Network Mass Events—Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Cases

DOI: 10.12677/MM.2022.125074, PP. 554-563

Keywords: 网络群体性事件,舆情热度,定性比较分析
Network Mass Incidents
, Public Opinion Heat, Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着网络技术的发展,网络传播速度快、范围广等特点致使网络群体性事件在网络空间迅速传播、发酵,管理机构难以对事件产生的舆情热度进行预判并及时干预。对此,文章选取2018~2020年三年间的20个网络群体性事件案例进行研究,借助定性比较分析研究方法探究网络群体性事件中舆情热度的影响因素及其组合路径。研究提出网络群体性事件中舆情热度影响因素的两条组合路径,并发现媒体报道力度和意见领袖参与是舆情热度生成的关键因素。对此,提出相应治理路径:了解舆情热度生成的组态效应,建立网络舆情预警机制;完善公共政策制定,注重保障民众权益;建立与重要媒体的合作机制,主动联系培养意见领袖;及时发布信息和公开回应,积极引导疏解舆情。
With the development of network technology, the characteristics of fast transmission speed and wide range lead to the rapid spread and fermentation of network mass incidents in the network space, and it is difficult to predict and intervene in the public opinion heat generated by the event. So this paper selected 20 cases of network mass incidents in the three years from 2018 to 2020 for research, and explored the influencing factors and combination paths of public opinion heat in network mass incidents with the help of qualitative comparative analysis. This paper proposes two combined paths of influencing factors of public opinion heat in network mass incidents, and finds that the intensity of media coverage and the participation of opinion leaders are the key factors for generating public opinion heat. As a result, the corresponding governance path is put forward: the government should understand the combined effect of public opinion heat production and establish an early warning mechanism of network public opinion; the government needs to improve the formulation of public policies and pay attention to the protection of people’s rights and interests; the government should establish a cooperative mechanism with important media and take the initiative to contact and cultivate opinion leaders; relevant government departments need to release information and make public responses in a timely manner.

References

[1]  李静, 谢耘耕. 网络舆情热度的影响因素研究——基于2010-2018年10600起舆情事件的实证分析[J]. 新闻界, 2020(2): 37-45.
[2]  袁国平, 许晓兵. 基于系统动力学的关于突发事件后网络舆情热度研究[J]. 情报科学, 2015, 33(10): 52-56.
[3]  杨洋洋, 谢雪梅. 基于QCA的网络舆情热度影响因素构型分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(5): 142-146.
[4]  李晚莲, 高光涵. 突发公共事件网络舆情热度生成机理研究——基于48个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA) [J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(7): 94-100.
[5]  兰月新, 王芳, 董希琳, 苏国强, 张鹏. 公共危机事件网络舆情热度模型研究[J]. 情报科学, 2016, 34(2): 32-36.
[6]  张蒙. 突发公共卫生事件网络舆情发酵机理研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(9): 20-31.
[7]  白列湖. 协同论与管理协同理论[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2007(5): 228-230.
[8]  哈罗德?拉斯韦尔. 社会传播的结构与功能[M]. 何道宽, 译. 北京: 中国传媒大学出版社, 2013.
[9]  黄怡璇, 谢健民, 秦琴, 杨丽颖. 影响网络舆情热度评价的主要因素识别研究[J]. 情报学, 2017, 35(10): 49-54+62.
[10]  刘锐. 地方重大舆情危机特征及干预效果影响因素——基于2003年以来110起地方政府重大舆情危机的实证分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(6): 93-99+139.
[11]  赵蓉英, 王旭. 突发事件网络舆情关键节点识别及导控对策研究——以“大贤村遭洪灾事件”为例[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(1): 19-24+30.
[12]  王颖文. 网络群体性事件中的网络舆论研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2010.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133