|
恩施州近50年洪涝与降水时空特征分析
|
Abstract:
本文采用1970~2020年恩施州8个气象站的降水资料,计算恩施州近五十年的年均降水量的Z指数,判断旱涝等级,并利用平均值法及平均中心对恩施州的洪涝与降水情况进行了时空分析,得到以下研究结果:时间分布上,恩施州在近五十年内出现19次偏涝,35次大涝,33次重涝,共出现了87次洪涝,洪涝主要集中分布在1979~1983年、1996~1998年、2007~2008年、2016~2020年,洪涝类型以重涝和大涝为主;空间分布上,从降水平均值观察,整体降水量多,地区分布存在细小差别,时空分布不均匀,总体呈现南多北少,尤其东南居多、东北和西北较少的特征;从平均中心观察,1970~2020年演变路径无大致规律可循,平均中心演变位置比较分散,但集中在宣恩县,近50年整体平均中心位置主要在宣恩县。
Based on the precipitation data of 8 meteorological stations in Enshi Prefecture from 1970 to 2020, this paper calculates the Z index of the average annual precipitation in Enshi Prefecture in recent 50 years, judges the level of drought and flood, and makes a temporal and spatial analysis of the flood and precipitation in Enshi Prefecture by using the average method and the average center, the following research results are obtained: in terms of time distribution, there have been 19 partial floods, 35 large floods and 33 heavy floods in Enshi Prefecture in recent 50 years, with a total of 87 floods. The floods are mainly concentrated in 1979~1983, 1996~1998, 2007~2008 and 2016~2020, and the types of floods are mainly large floods and heavy floods; In terms of spatial distribution, from the observation of the average value of precipitation, the overall precipitation is large, there are small differences in regional distribution, and the temporal and spatial distribution is uneven. On the whole, it shows the characteristics of more in the South and less in the north, especially more in the southeast and less in the northeast and northwest; from the observation of the average center, there is no general law to follow in the evolution path from 1970 to 2020. The evolution position of the average center is relatively scattered, but concentrated in Xuanen county. The overall average center position in recent 50 years is mainly in Xuanen county.
[1] | FitzGerald, G., Du, W., Jamal, A., Clark, M. and Hou, X.-Y. (2010) Flood Fatalities in Contemporary Australia (1997-2008). Emergency Medicine Australasia, 22, 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01284.x |
[2] | Nobert, J., Mugo, M. and Gadain, H. (2014) Estimation of Design Floods in Ungauged Catchments Using a Regional Index Flood Method. A Case study Of Lake Victoria Basin in Kenya. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 67-69, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2014.02.001 |
[3] | Brázdil, R., Chromá, K., ?eho?, J., Zahradní?ek, P., Dolák, L., ?ezní?ková, L., et al. (2019) Potential of Documentary Evidence to Study Fatalities of Hydrological and Meteorological Events in the Czech Republic. Water, 11, Article No. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102014 |
[4] | Cao, C., Xu, M., Kamsing, P., Boonprong, S., Yomwan, P. and Saokarn, A. (2021) Environmental Remote Sensing in Flooding Areas. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8202-8 |
[5] | Mukherjee, F. and Singh, D. (2020) Detecting Flood Prone Areas in Harris County: A GIS Based Analysis. GeoJournal: Spatially Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities, 85, 47-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-09984-2 |
[6] | 王跃民, 鲁慧霞, 刘璟瑜, 吴刚, 董仲民. 3个不同旱涝指标划分旱涝等级的比较研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(7): 326-327+329. |
[7] | 刘爱华, 鲁会霞. 用旱涝指数划分旱涝等级的尝试[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(10): 296. |
[8] | 鞠笑生, 杨贤为, 陈丽娟. 我国单站旱涝指标的确定和区域旱涝等级划分的研究[J]. 应用气象学报, 1997, 8(1): 20-32. |
[9] | 陆桂荣, 郑美琴, 周秀君, 张民凯, 马品印. 山东日照市2种干旱指标的应用对比[J]. 干旱气象, 2010, 28(1): 102-106. |
[10] | 刘志雄, 肖莺. 长江上游旱涝指标及其变化特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(3): 310-314. |
[11] | 张娜, 陈莹, 张粮锋, 童为民, 朱志强. 基于Z指数的福州市近51年旱涝时空特征分析[J]. 海南师范大学学报, 2015, 28(3): 292-297. |
[12] | 彭高辉, 宋宝, 韦保磊. 基于Z指数的黄河流域旱涝等级游程分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2014(11): 24-28+32. |
[13] | 马明卫, 宋松柏. 渭河流域干旱指标空间分布研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(4): 681-691. |
[14] | 陈纪修, 於崇华, 金路. 数学分析[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2004. |
[15] | 郑宇, 席武俊. 改革开放以来浙江省GDP平均中心演化分析[C]//第四届EBMEI信息、社会科学与教育国际会议论文集(ISSE2019) (《管理科学讲义》, 第109卷). 2019: 520-525. |