|
|
阿替卡因用于4岁以内儿童的研究进展
|
Abstract:
阿替卡因是口腔科广为使用的局部麻醉药，近年来其在口腔科的地位甚至可以媲美传统金标准“利多卡因”，尤其在儿童口腔科，其优越的麻醉性能使之广泛应用于低龄儿童。然而，阿替卡因制造商不建议其应用于4岁以内儿童，这使得4岁以内儿童进行口腔治疗变得十分艰难。本文是对现有文献的回顾和对4岁以下儿童口腔治疗中使用阿替卡因进行局部浸润麻醉的现状进行阐述。为4岁以下儿童应用阿替卡因提供了询证医学方面的指导。
Articaine is a widely used local anesthetic solution in stomatology. In recent years, its reputation in stomatology is even comparable to the traditional gold standard “lidocaine”, especially in children’s dentistry. Its excellent anesthetic properties make it widely used in children. However, the manu-facturer does not recommend its use in children under 4 years old, which makes dental treatment for children under 4 years old more difficult. This article is a review of the existing literature and an elaboration on the current status of articaine use in children under 4 years old. Providing evi-dence-based medical guidance for the use of articaine with children under 4 years old.
| [1] | Brickhouse, T.H., Unkel, J.H., Webb, M.D., et al. (2008) Articaine Use in Children among Dental Practitioners. Pediat-ric Dentistry, 30, 516-521. |
| [2] | Bina, B., Hersh, E.V., Hilario, M., et al. (2018) True Allergy to Amide Local Anesthet-ics: A Review and Case Presentation. Anesthesia Progress, 65, 119-123. https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-65-03-06 |
| [3] | Oliver, G., David, D.A., Bell, C., Robb, N., et al. (2016) An Investiga-tion into Dental Local Anaesthesia Teaching in United Kingdom Dental Schools. SAAD Digest, 32, 7-13. |
| [4] | Wright, G.Z., Weinberger, S.J., Friedman, C.S., Plotzke, O.B., et al. (1989) Use of Articaine Local Anesthesia in Children under 4 Years of Age—A Retrospective Report. Anesthesia Progress, 36, 268-271. |
| [5] | Leith, R., Lynch, K., O’Connell, A.C., et al. (2012) Articaine Use in Children: A Review. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 13, 293-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03320829 |
| [6] | Ram, D. and Amir, E. (2006) Comparison of Articaine 4% and Lido-caine 2% in Paediatric Dental Patients. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 16, 252-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00745.x |
| [7] | Malamed, S.F., Gagnon, S., Leblanc, D., et al. (2000) A Comparison between Articaine HCl and Lidocaine HCl in Pediatric Dental Patients. Pediatric Dentistry, 22, 307-311. |
| [8] | Katyal, V. (2010) The Efficacy and Safety of Articaine versus Lignocaine in Dental Treatments: A Me-ta-Analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 38, 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.12.003 |
| [9] | The Editor Rec-ommends This Issue’s Article to the Reader: Anaesthetic Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Children’s Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 28, 346.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12376 |
| [10] | Bonifacio, C.C. (2018) The Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine Local An-aesthetic in Child Patients. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 19, 105-106. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401340 |
| [11] | Bahrololoomi, Z. and Maghsoudi, N. (2021) Articaine Use Does Not Routinely Eliminate the Need for Palatal Injections for Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions: A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 26, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-01021-2 |
| [12] | Chopra, R., Marwaha, M., Bansal, K., Mittal, M., et al. (2016) Evaluation of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alve-olar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Mandibular Primary Molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentis-try, 40, 301-305. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.4.301 |
| [13] | Elheeny, A.A.H. (2020) Articaine Efficacy and Safety in Young Children below the Age of Four Years: An Equivalent Parallel Randomized Control Trial. Interna-tional Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 30, 547-555.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12640 |
| [14] | 马莹. 碧兰麻在小儿牙体牙髓病治疗中的效果观察及满意度影响评价[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2019, 6(27): 25-26. |
| [15] | Khanna, S.R., Rao, D., Panwar, S., Ameen, S., et al. (2021) An in Vivo, Randomized, Controlled Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy, Hemodynamic Changes, and Postoperative Complications of 4% Articaine Using Buccal Infiltration and 2% Lidocaine Using Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Man-dibular Primary Molars of Children Aged 6 to 8 Years. Quintessence International, 52, 780-786. |
| [16] | Alzahrani, F., Duggal, M.S., Munyombwe, T., Tahmassebi, J.F., et al. (2018) Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine for Extraction and Pulpotomy of Mandibular Primary Molars: An Equivalence Parallel Prospective Randomized Con-trolled Trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 28, 335-344.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12361 |
| [17] | Massignan, C., Santos, P.S., Cardoso, M. and Bolan, M. (2020) Efficacy and Adverse Events of 4% Articaine Compared with 2% Lidocaine on Primary Molar Extraction: A Randomised Con-trolled Trial. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 47, 1031-1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12989 |
| [18] | Arrow, P. (2012) A Comparison of Articaine 4% and Lignocaine 2% in Block and Infiltration Analgesia in Children. Australian Dental Journal, 57, 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01699.x |
| [19] | Wright, G.Z., Weinberger, S.J., Marti, R., Plotzke, O., et al. (1991) The Effectiveness of Infiltration Anesthesia in the Mandibular Primary Molar Region. Pediatric Dentistry, 13, 278-283. |
| [20] | 刘芳, 袁媛. 碧兰麻在小儿牙体牙髓病治疗中的疗效分析[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(13): 33-34. |
| [21] | 黄志昌, 陈家鑫. 阿替卡因肾上腺素与利多卡因对儿童根管治疗术的麻醉效果及血流动力学的影响[J]. 中国医学创新, 2020, 17(16): 5-8. |
| [22] | Ezzeldin, M., Hanks, G., Collard, M., et al. (2020) United Kingdom Pediatric Dentistry Specialist Views on the Administration of Articaine in Children. Jour-nal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 20, 303-312.
https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.5.303 |
| [23] | Adewumi, A., Hall, M., Guelmann, M., Riley, J., et al. (2008) The Incidence of Adverse Reactions Following 4% Septocaine (Articaine) in Children. Pediatric Dentistry, 30, 424-428. |
