|
翻转课堂教学模式下学生感知影响因素分析——基于大学数学教学的实证研究
|
Abstract:
翻转课堂采用多元化、多维度的模式对教学质量进行整体评估,为学生提供多样化互动协作学习模式。本文以大学数学教学为例,实证分析翻转课堂教学模式下学生感知影响因素。在学习风格模型基础上,结合学生的知识迁移能力,划分出学习风格和协作组织能力缺失两个维度,探讨处理积极性这一单项测量度对学生感知稳定性的影响,并研究其余前置测量度之间的逻辑关联,最后,将各项测量度放入结构方程模型中进行测验。研究表明:1) 学生在翻转课堂教学模式上产生的处理积极性是影响两个维度中的关键因素,不同维度的学习风格对处理积极性产生的强弱影响互异,而协作处理能力缺失较学习能力显著负向影响其处理积极性;2) 学生经过持续学习所产生不同层次的理解也会间接性正向影响处理积极性。
Flipped classroom adopts a diversified, multi-dimensional model to assess the overall teaching quality, and provides students with a diversified interactive collaborative learning model. This article takes university mathematics teaching as an example to empirically analyze the influencing factors of students’ perception under the flipped classroom teaching mode. On the basis of the learning style model, combined with the students’ knowledge transfer ability, the two dimensions of learning style and the lack of collaborative organization ability are divided, the influence of the single measure of processing enthusiasm on the stability of students’ perception is explored, and the remaining pre-measures are studied. Finally, put the various measures into the structural equation model for testing. Research shows that: 1) The processing enthusiasm of students in the flipped classroom teaching model is the key factor affecting the two dimensions. The learning styles of different dimensions have different effects on the processing enthusiasm, and the lack of collaborative processing ability is more effective than learning. Ability significantly negatively affects their processing enthusiasm; 2) Different levels of understanding produced by students through continuous learning will also indirectly positively affect their processing enthusiasm.
[1] | 宋生涛, 杨晓萍. 翻转课堂的基本原理与教学形态[J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2018, 55(2): 98-104. |
[2] | Schunk, D.H. (1995) Inherent Details of Self-Regulated Learning Include Student Perceptions. Educational Psychologist, 30, 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3004_7 |
[3] | 李广凤, 王梦. 非英语专业大学生英语学习动机消退的影响因素及其与学业成绩的关系研究[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2016, 36(9): 53-55. |
[4] | 邵美郡. 翻转课堂教学模式在高校课堂的应用现状研究[J]. 文学教育(上), 2020(7): 146-147. |
[5] | Roche, J., Bell, L., Martin, I., et al. (2021) Science Communication through STEAM: Professional Development and Flipped Classrooms in the Digital Age. Science Communication, 43, 805-813.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211038506 |
[6] | Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (2002) Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta-Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110 |
[7] | Slavin, R.E. (1981) Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. Educational Leadership, 38, 655-660. |
[8] | Kolb, D.A. (1983) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. |
[9] | Rowland, S. (2010) Jung’s Cultural Writing and Modern Man in Search of a Soul (1933): Spiral Essays and Performing Symbols. International Journal of Jungian Studies, 2, 21-31. |
[10] | Felder, R.M. (1988) Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78, 674-681. |
[11] | Topping, K. (2003) Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility. In: Segers, M., Dochy, F. and Cascallar, E., Eds., Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, Springer, Dordrecht, 55-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4 |
[12] | Comment, L.A. (2009) What Is Collaborative Learning. Creative Education, 46, 32-38. |
[13] | Topping, K.J. and Ehly, S.W. (2008) Peer-Assisted Learning. Elementary Secondary Education, 33, 371-383. |
[14] | Dochy, F., Segers, M., Piet, V., et al. (2003) Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Learning & Instruction, 13, 533-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7 |
[15] | Martinez, C. and Tilson, J.K. (2021) Controlled Comparison of a Flipped Classroom Evidence-Based Practice Course Delivered Online or On-Campus. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 26, 219-223.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111522 |
[16] | Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., et al. (2005) Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis from the Angle of Assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27-61. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027 |
[17] | Jhamb, S. and Kumar, M. (2021) Flipped Classroom: An Effective Pedagogy for Large-Size Classrooms. Motifs: A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English Studies, 7, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-1753.2021.00011.8 |
[18] | Chua, K.J. and Islam, M.R. (2021) The Hybrid Project-Based Learning-Flipped Classroom: A Design Project Module Redesigned to Foster Learning and Engagement. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 49, 289-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419019838335 |
[19] | Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008) Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 |
[20] | Malhotra, M.K., Singhal, C., Shang, G., et al. (2014) A Critical Evaluation of Alternative Methods and Paradigms for Conducting Mediation Analysis in Operations Management Research. Journal of Operations Management, 32, 127-137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.01.003 |
[21] | Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J.G. and Chen, Q. (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257 |