综合型一流大学建设高校科研绩效评价研究——基于DEA-Malmquist模型
Research on the Performance Evaluation of Scientific Research in the Construction of Comprehensive First-Class Universities —Based on DEA-Malmquist Model

DOI: 10.12677/AE.2022.124164, PP. 1038-1045

Keywords: 一流大学建设，综合型院校，数据包络分析，科研绩效
First-Class University Construction, Comprehensive Colleges, DEA, Scientific Research Performance

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

一流建设院校作为发展教育领域的重大国家战略，重点在于增强高等学校综合实力。以一流建设高校中的综合型院校为重点研究对象，收集并整理各高校科研投资和产出的数据，通过DEA-BCC模型测算科研的静态效果，并运用投影分析高校科研产出的不足情况。此外，利用DEA-Malmquist指数对2013年至2017的综合型院校的科研动态绩效进行统计分析并观察其科研绩效趋势。研究结果表明：院校之间科研绩效存在差异明显、使用效率不高的问题。在此基础上，对一流建设院校中的综合型高校，给出科研工作改进措施。
As a major national strategy for the development of education, the first-class construction of colleges and universities focuses on enhancing the comprehensive strength of colleges and universities. Focusing on the comprehensive colleges and universities in the first-class construction universities as the key research objects, collect and organize the data of scientific research investment and out-put of various colleges and universities, calculate the static effect of scientific research through the DEA-BCC model, and use projection to analyze the shortage of scientific research output in colleges and universities. In addition, the DEA-Malmquist index was used to statistically analyze the dynam-ic performance of scientific research of comprehensive universities from 2013 to 2017 and observe the trend of their scientific research performance. The research results show that there are obvious differences in scientific research performance among institutions and low utilization efficiency. On this basis, for the comprehensive colleges and universities in the first-class construction colleges and universities, the improvement measures for scientific research work are given.

References

[1]	蒋文昭, 王新. 知识生产模式转型与高校科研支持体系变革[J]. 中国高校科技, 2018(8): 14-17.
[2]	王宁, 王鲁玉. 基于改进DEA交叉模型的“一流大学”建设高校科研效率评价[J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(2): 75-80.
[3]	翁秋怡. 我国高校科研、教学和社会服务效率趋势研究——以72所教育部直属高校为例[J]. 当代教育科学, 2017(10): 81-86.
[4]	马玲玲. 基于Malmquist指数模型的研究型高校科研绩效评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(22): 68-70.
[5]	刘长清, 张琳, 董颖, 张薇, 王爱荣. 黑龙江省高校科研绩效评价实践研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2019, 38(8): 74-78.
[6]	张家峰, 李佳楠, 陈红喜, 周洁. 长三角高校科研创新绩效评价及影响因素研究——基于DEA-Malmquist-Tobit模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(9): 80-87.
[7]	廖帅, 葛梅, 苏雪晨, 吕卉. 我国不同区域高校科研效率评价研究——基于分类DEA模型的实证分析[J]. 中国高校科技, 2021(Z1): 38-42.
[8]	杨敏, 费锡玥, 魏宇琪, 梁樑. 基于资源共享与子系统交互的两阶段DEA评价方法——兼对我国“一流大学”科研绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 256-263.
[9]	Beasley, J.E. (1990) Comparing University Departments. Omega, 18, 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(90)90064-G
[10]	Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984) Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[11]	Ahn, T., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1988) Some Statistical and DEA Evaluations of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institutions of Higher Learning. So-cio-Economic Planning Sciences, 22, 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(88)90008-0
[12]	马欣悦, 石伟平, 王碗. 72所国家示范性高职院校科研绩效研究——基于DEA模型的文献分析[J]. 中国高校科技, 2021(Z1): 48-52.
[13]	张帆. 高等学校科研绩效评价研究[J]. 教育现代化, 2020, 7(16): 99-102.
[14]	教育部. 高等学校科技统计资料[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A16/, 2020-09-18.
[15]	Coelli, T.J. (1996) A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envel-opment Analysis Computer Program. The University of New England, Armidale.

Full-Text