目的：探讨以家庭为中心的产科优质护理对于初产妇产后情绪、睡眠状况及护理满意度的影响。方法：将2021年1月~2022年1月在我院自然分娩的100例初产妇纳入本次研究，采用随机数表法将其分为对照组和观察组，每组各50例，对照组初产妇采用常规护理，观察组采用以家庭为中心的产科优质护理(FCMC)，对比两组初产妇护理前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、爱丁堡产后抑郁自评量表(EPDS)和匹兹堡睡眠质量量表(PSQI)评分，并对比分析两组初产妇对护理工作的满意度。结果：护理干预前，两组孕产妇睡眠质量评分、焦虑、抑郁情绪评分比较不存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)，护理干预后，两组孕产妇睡眠质量和焦虑、抑郁情绪均有所改善，且观察组SAS、EPDS、PSQI评分低于对照组(P < 0.05)，护理干预后，观察组孕产妇护理满意度为100.0%，高于对照组的72.0%，数据存在统计学差异(χ2 = 16.471, P < 0.05)。结论：FCMC可缓解初产妇焦虑、抑郁的负性情绪，改善其睡眠质量，提高护理满意度。
Objective: To explore the effect of
family centered obstetric high-quality nursing on postpartum mood, sleep status
and nursing satisfaction. Methods: 100 primiparas who gave birth naturally in
our hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were included in this study.
They were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 50
cases in each group. The primiparas in the control group received routine
nursing and the observation group received family centered obstetric quality
nursing (FCMC). The self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) before and after nursing
was compared between the two groups Edinburgh Postpartum Depression self rating
scale (EPDS) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI) scores, and compared and
analyzed the satisfaction of primipara in the two groups. Results: Before nursing
intervention, there was no significant difference in the scores of sleep
quality, anxiety and depression between the two groups (P < 0.05). After nursing intervention, the sleep quality, anxiety and depression of the two groups were improved, and the scores of SAS, EPDS and PSQI in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction of pregnant women in the observation group was 100.0%, which was higher than 72.0% in the control group (χ2 = 16.471, P < 0.05). Conclusion: FCMC can alleviate the negative emotions of anxiety and depression of primipara, improve their sleep quality and improve nursing satisfaction.
