全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

家庭功能、应对方式对小学中高年级儿童攻击行为的影响
The Effect of Family Functioning and Coping Styles on Aggressive Behavior for Children in the Higher Grades of Primary School

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.124155, PP. 1301-1314

Keywords: 小学中高年级儿童,攻击行为,家庭功能,应对方式
Primary School Children in Higher Grades
, Aggressive Behavior, Family Functioning, Coping Styles

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨小学中高年级儿童攻击行为、家庭功能和应对方式的关系。方法:方便采样,对669名深圳某小学中高年级儿童施测攻击量表(AQ)、家庭功能评定量表(FAD)和简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)。结果:1) 男生的AQ身体攻击因子得分显著高于女生(p < 0.01),非独生子女AQ中攻击总分以及愤怒因子得分、敌对因子得分均显著高于独生子女(p < 0.05)。2) 四、五、六三个年级在FAD情感介入因子得分、SCSQ消极应对因子得分、以及AQ口头攻击因子得分、AQ敌对因子得分、AQ愤怒因子得分和攻击总分上均存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。3) 相关分析结果显示攻击行为与家庭功能呈显著负相关(p < 0.05),与应对方式中的“消极应对”呈显著正相关(p < 0.01)。4) 多元逐步回归分析显示,家庭功能各因子与积极应对方式对攻击行为及各因子有显著负向预测作用,消极应对方式对攻击行为及各因子有显著正向预测作用。对“身体攻击”、“口头攻击”、“愤怒”、“敌对”和“攻击总分”的总解释率分别为54.5%、32.2%、31.2%、27.8%与51.3%。结论:家庭功能、应对方式对小学中高年级儿童攻击行为有影响效应,通过对家庭功能和应对方式的干预,可减少儿童攻击行为的发生。
Objective: To explore the relationship between aggressive behavior, family functioning and coping styles of the higher grades children of primary school. Methods: A total of 669 children in the higher grades of primary school in Shenzhen were tested by Aggression Question (AQ), Family Assessment Device (FAD) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Results: 1) The score of physical aggression factor of AQ of boys was significantly higher than that of girls (p < 0.01), the scores of anger factor, hostility factor and the total score of aggression of non-only-child’s AQ were significantly higher than those of only-child’s AQ (p < 0.05). 2) There were significant differences in the scores of emotional involvement factor of FAD, negative coping factor of SCSQ, verbal aggression factor of AQ, hostility factor of AQ, anger factor of AQ and the total score of aggression of AQ in grade 4, 5 and 6 (p < 0.05). 3) Correlation analysis showed that aggressive behavior was significantly negatively correlated with family functioning (p < 0.05), and positively correlated with negative coping style (p < 0.01). 4) Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the factors of family functioning and positive coping styles had a significant negative predictive effect on the aggressive behavior and its factors, while the negative coping styles had a significant positive predictive effect on the aggressive behavior and its factors. The total explaining rate of these impact factors for physical aggression factor, verbal aggression factor, anger factor, hostility factor and the total score of aggression were 54.5%, 32.2%, 31.2%, 27.8% and 51.3% respectively. Conclusion: Family functioning and coping styles have influence on aggressive behavior of the higher grades children of primary school. The intervention of family functioning and coping styles can reduce the occurrence of children’s aggressive behavior.

References

[1]  杜红梅, 冯维(2007). 小学高年级学生应对方式与自我意识、家庭功能的关系. 中国特殊教育, 88(10), 70-75.
[2]  樊鑫, 王志中, 何志晶(2013). 中学生应对方式与攻击性的关系. 中国学校卫生, 34(5), 551-553.
[3]  方永慈(2019). 中学生父母控制、应对方式与攻击行为的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27(12), 1875-1879.
[4]  高桦(1997). 被攻击着的性别差异研究. 社会心理科学, 4, 26-29.
[5]  韩晓燕(2005). 中国离婚单亲家庭青少年的需要. 上海社会科学院出版社.
[6]  黄希庭, 余华, 郑涌, 等(2000). 中学生应对方式的初步研究. 心理科学, 23(1), 1-5.
[7]  黄彦, 谢晓琳, 周晖(2016). 亲子依恋与儿童问题行为的相关: 师生关系的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 1074-1078.
[8]  纪林芹, 魏星, 陈亮, 等(2012). 童年晚期同伴关系不利与儿童的攻击行为: 自我概念与同伴信念的中介作用. 心理学报, 44(11), 1479-1489.
[9]  纪林芹, 张文新(2007). 儿童攻击发展研究的新进展. 心理发展与教育, 2, 122-127.
[10]  景璐石, 冯军, 徐涛, 等(2014). 青少年攻击行为与应激事件、应对方式相关性研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(1), 53-55.
[11]  李兰芳, 王丽娟(2014). 关于幼儿家庭功能的测查分析. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 36(6), 72-76.
[12]  李晓芳, 杨淑红, 王敏娜(2005). 单亲家庭子女个性特征和行为问题对照研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 13(5), 375-376.
[13]  刘建榕(2003). 不同性别学童攻击行为与家庭环境的关系. 健康心理学杂志, 11 (2), 103-106.
[14]  刘丽, 姚梅玲(2006). 儿童应对方式的研究进展. 中国妇幼保健, 21(18), 2594-2596.
[15]  刘莉, 王美萍, 曹丛, 等(2014). 青少年期亲子和谐特点及与内外化问题行为的关系. 中国特殊教育, 1, 73-78.
[16]  刘培洁(2019). 基于家庭系统理论——探究儿童攻击性行为的家庭影响因素及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 苏州大学教育学院.
[17]  刘儒德(2007). 发展与教育心理学. 人民教育出版社.
[18]  刘霞, 张跃兵, 张国华(2019). 家庭因素对非独生子女心理健康的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 27(10), 1536-1539.
[19]  屈智勇, 邹泓(2009). 家庭环境、父母监控、自我控制与青少年犯罪. 心理科学, 32(2), 360-363.
[20]  任小丹, 曹静, 崔海松, 等(2014). 某大学学生攻击性行为特点及家庭功能的调查研究. 同济大学学报(医学版), 35(3), 118-122.
[21]  苏君华(2021). 离异家庭子女心理特点及教育策略探析. 成才之路, 8, 143-144.
[22]  王玲凤(2007). 幼儿应对方式对幼儿问题行为的影响. 中华预防医学杂志, 41(4), 258-261.
[23]  王璐(2017). 中职生的问题行为及其与心理弹性、应对方式的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25(4), 599-603.
[24]  王世军(2002). 单亲家庭及其对子女成长的影响. 学海, 4, 84-88.
[25]  王秀珍(2006). 儿童行为问题的研究进展. 中国行为医学科学, 15(7), 667-668.
[26]  王雪云, 沈棫华, 李业平(2015). 幼儿家庭功能初步研究. 科技资讯,, 13(30), 203-206.
[27]  王英杰, 李燕, 吴凡(2021). 家庭功能与学前儿童行为问题的关系: 依恋回避和社会焦虑的多重中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(1), 76-83.
[28]  辛自强, 池丽萍(2003). 家庭功能与儿童孤独感的关系: 中介的作用. 心理学报, 35(2), 216-221.
[29]  余毅震, 史俊霞, 黄艳, 等(2005). 家庭因素与儿童青少年攻击行为关系探讨. 中国学校卫生, 26(10), 811-813.
[30]  张婷婷, 杨子珺(2021). 家庭功能视角下儿童心理行为问题分析. 科技资讯, 19(18), 195-198.
[31]  张盈(2017). 高中生的自尊、宽恕对攻击行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 天津师范大学.
[32]  章志光(1996). 社会心理学. 人民教育出版社.
[33]  赵陵波, 陈洁, 任志洪(2016). 家庭功能与青少年问题行为的关系: 情绪智力的中介作用. 福建教育学院学报, 17(4), 56-60.
[34]  赵文秀(2020). 高中生家庭功能与攻击行为的关系: 道德敏感性的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 山东师范大学.
[35]  Arsenio, W. F., & Overton, W. F. (2004). Trajectories of Physical Aggression from Toddlerhood to Middle Childhood: Predictors, Correlates, and Outcomes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, 1-25.
[36]  Brown III, R. M. (2002). The Development of Family Violence as a Field of Study and Contributors to Family and Community Violence among Low-Income Fathers. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 499-511.
https://doi.org /10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00077-5
[37]  Campbell, S. B., Spieker, S., Vandergrift, N., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2010). Predictors and Sequelae of Trajectories of Physical Aggression in School-Age Boys and Girls. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 133-150.
https://doi.org /10.1017/S0954579409990319
[38]  Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and Indirect Aggression during Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185-1229.
https://doi.org /10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
[39]  Chen, L., Zhang, W., Ji, L., &Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). Developmental Trajectories of Chinese Adolescents’ Relational Aggression: Associations with Changes in Social-Psychological Adjustment. Child Development, 90, 2153-2170.
https://doi.org /10.1111/cdev.13090
[40]  Critchfield, K. L., Levy, K. N., Clarkin, J. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The Relational Context of Aggression in Borderline Personality Disorder: Using Adult Attachment Style to Predict Forms of Hostility. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 67-82.
https://doi.org /10.1002/jclp.20434
[41]  Danzig, A. P., Dyson, M. W., Olino, T. M., Laptook, R. S., & Klein, D. N. (2015). Positive Parenting Interacts with Child Temperament and Negative Parenting to Predict Children's Socially Appropriate Behavior. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 34, 411-435.
https://doi.org /10.1521/jscp.2015.34.5.411
[42]  Donna, C., & Amy, B. (2014). Using Systems Theory to Understand and Respond to Family Influences on Children`s Bullying Behavior: Friendly Schools Friendly Families Program. Theory into Practice, 53, 293-299.
https://doi.org /10.1080/00405841.2014.947223
[43]  Elgar, F. J., Knight, J., Worrall, G. J., & Sherman, G. (2003). Attachment Characteristics and Behavioural Problems in Rural and Urban Juvenile Delinquents. Child Psychiatry& Human Development, 34, 35-48.
https://doi.org /10.1023/A:1025349908855
[44]  Feld, B. A. (2015). Interparental Conflict in Late Childhood and Adolescent Social and Emotional Outcomes: The Role of Parent-Child Relationships, Parenting Styles, and Emotion Regulation Capacities. Ph.D. Thesis, Adelphi University.
[45]  Groh, A. M., Fearon, R. P., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Ijzendoorn, M. H. V., Steele, R. D., & Roisman, G. L. (2014). The Significance of Attachment Security for Children’s Social Competence with Peers: A Meta-Analytic Study. Attachment & Human Development, 16, 103-136.
https://doi.org /10.1080/14616734.2014.883636
[46]  Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping Theory and Research: Past, Present, and Future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234-247.
https://doi.org /10.1097/00006842-199305000-00002
[47]  Lemons, M. A., & Parzinger, M. (2007). Gender Schemas: A Cognitive Explanation of Discrimination of Women in Technology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 91-98.
https://doi.org /10.1007/s10869-007-9050-0
[48]  Lissuzzo, A. D. (2005). Parent Relationship Quality and Child Aggression: The Mediating Role of Family Functioning. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago.
[49]  Ma, X., Yao, Y., & Zhao, X. (2013). Prevalence of Behavioral Problems and Related Family Functioning among Middle School Students in an Eastern City of China. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 5, E1-E8.
https://doi.org /10.1111/j.1758-5872.2012.00211.x
[50]  Miller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., & Epstein, N. B. (2000). The McMaster Approach to Families: Theory, Assessment, Treatment and Research. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 168-189.
https://doi.org /10.1111/1467-6427.00145
[51]  Sandler, I. N., Tein, J. Y., & West, S. G. (1995). Coping, Stress, and the Psychological Symptoms of Children of Divorce: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 65, 1744-1763.
https://doi.org /10.2307/1131291

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133