|
多子女家庭同胞关系影响因素及作用过程的质性研究
|
Abstract:
本文采用质性研究的方法,探讨多子女家庭同胞关系的影响因素及作用过程。采用基于深度访谈的扎根理论方法,运用随机抽样等方式,共抽取6名被试。结果表明多子女家庭同胞关系影响因素主要包括个人、家庭以及外界三个方面。影响因素的作用过程主要体现在对认知以及认知向行为转换的过程之中。自身因素、榜样因素以及环境因素会影响同胞认知观念,家庭氛围、性别组合、个人气质性格以及爱的变化影响认知向行为的转换。
In this paper, we use the method of qualitative research to explore the influencing factors and processes of sibling relations in families with multiple children. A total of 6 participants were se-lected by means of random sampling and other methods based on the grounded theoretical me-thod of in-depth interviews. The results show that the influencing factors of sibling relations in multi-child families mainly include three aspects: personal, family and external. The process of influencing factors is mainly reflected in the process of cognition and the transformation of cognition to behavior. Self-factors, role model factors and environmental factors will affect the cognitive concepts of compatriots, and changes in family atmosphere, gender combination, personal temperament and personality, and love will affect the transformation of cognition to behavior.
[1] | (2021). 全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国人口与计划生育法》的决定. 中华人民共和国全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报, (6), 1192-1198. |
[2] | 陈斌斌, 王燕, 梁霁, 童连(2016). 二胎进行时: 头胎儿童在向同胞关系过渡时的生理和心理变化及其影响因素. 心理科学进展, 24(6), 863-873. |
[3] | 陈健芷, 刘昭阳, 刘勇(2013). 初中生受欺负现状及其与亲子依恋和同伴关系的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(5), 795-799. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.05.014 |
[4] | 陈媛媛(2018). 二胎家庭中父母对3 - 6岁长子(女)“同胞接纳”教育现状研究——以哈尔滨市为例. 硕士学位论文, 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨师范大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201802&filename=1018994601.nh |
[5] | 崔洁(2021). 中小学头胎儿童同胞接纳对其心理适应的影响. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202102&filename=1021587130.nh |
[6] | 戴旒茜(2015). 2至10岁原“独二代”子女对“二胎”手足接纳度的调查与对策. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201602&filename=1016031920.nh |
[7] | 邓屹杉(2021). 青春期长子女同伴关系对同胞关系的影响. 硕士学位论文, 石家庄: 河北师范大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202102&filename=1021587151.nh |
[8] | 董颖红, 刘丹(2019). 中学生的同胞关系与学业自我效能感——自尊的中介作用和出生顺序的调节作用. 基础教育, 16(3), 94-100. |
[9] | 冯欣(2021). 同胞接纳与学龄期长子女焦虑的关系: 父母协同教养和家庭环境纷杂度的调节作用. 硕士学位论文, 济南: 山东师范大学. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFDTEMP&filename=1021107259.nh |
[10] | 冯钰, 王丽丽(2021). 多子女家庭中同胞互动对幼儿社会性发展的影响研究. 早期教育, (9), 53-56. |
[11] | 弓剑虹(2018). 幼儿心目中的“二孩”及其对家庭教育的启示. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201901&filename=1018262402.nh |
[12] | 韩宠(2020). 二孩家庭中头胎幼儿的同胞关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 东北师范大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202101&filename=1020656362.nh |
[13] | 洪伟(2019). 同胞关系对儿童社会性发展的影响. 少年儿童研究, (2), 44-48. |
[14] | 李何丽, 韩巍, 张慧敏(2017). 基于全面二胎政策开放下长子女心理探析——长子女心理问题新分析. 广西教育学院学报, 32(4), 57-61. |
[15] | 明文, 张振新(2020). “全面二孩”政策下同胞关系调查与教育建议——基于首孩的视角. 西部学刊, (24), 42-45.
https://doi.org/10.16721/j.cnki.cn61-1487/c.2020.24.012 |
[16] | 王倩倩(2017). 个案工作介入头胎儿童排斥二胎的心理干预案例研究. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林农业大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201801&filename=1017843071.nh |
[17] | 王天文(2021). “同胞弟妹”对未成年“大宝”的心理意义. 江苏教育, (42), 55-56. |
[18] | 王文婷(2014). 高中生同胞关系与孤独感的关系: 同伴关系的中介作用. 硕士学位论文, 烟台: 鲁东大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201402&filename=1014260285.nh |
[19] | 吴继霞, 黄希庭(2012). 诚信结构初探. 心理学报, 44(3), 354-368. |
[20] | 张荣臻, 曹晓君, 冉光明, 夏云川(2019). 同胞关系质量对头胎幼儿共情的影响. 学前教育研究, (8), 52-63.
https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2019.08.005 |
[21] | 张晓丽, 植雪仪, 钟霖, 于珍, 赵顺英(2021). 学龄前儿童攻击行为特点及其与同胞关系的关联. 中国心理卫生杂志, 35(1), 40-45. |
[22] | 张雪丽(2015). “单独二胎”新计生政策下儿童同胞关系及相关因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 泸州: 四川医科大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201601&filename=1015339819.nh |
[23] | 赵凤青, 俞国良(2017). 同胞关系及其与儿童青少年社会性发展的关系. 心理科学进展, 25(5), 825-836. |
[24] | 庄妍(2017). 家庭长子女对同胞出生的适应研究: 进展与反思. 中国健康教育, 33(2), 165-167+177.
https://doi.org/10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2017.02.018 |
[25] | Cicirelli, V. (1995). A Measure of Caregiving Daughters’ Attachment to Elderly Mothers. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 89-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.9.1.89 |
[26] | Cox, M. J. (2010). Family Systems and Sibling Relationships. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 95-96.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00124.x |
[27] | Morgan, J. K., Shaw, D. S., & Olino, T. M. (2012). Differential Susceptibility Effects: The Interaction of Negative Emotionality and Sibling Relationship Quality on Childhood Internalizing Problems and Social Skills. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40, 885-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9618-7 |
[28] | Padilla-Walker, L. M., Harper, J. M., & Jensen, A. C. (2010). Self-Regulation as a Mediator between Sibling Relationship Quality and Early Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 419-428.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020387 |
[29] | Pike, A., & Oliver, B. R. (2017). Child Behavior and Sibling Relationship Quality: A Cross-Lagged Analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000248 |
[30] | Smorti, M., & Ponti, L. (2018). How Does Sibling Relationship Affect Children’s Prosocial Behaviors and Best Friend Relationship Quality? Journal of Family Issues, 39, 2413-2436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18755195 |
[31] | Streit, C., Carlo, G., Killoren, S. E., & Alfaro, E. C. (2017). Family Members’ Relationship Qualities and Prosocial Behaviors in U.S. Mexican Young Adults: The Roles of Familism and Ethnic Identity Resolution. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 1056-1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16686134 |
[32] | Trause, M. A., Voos, D., Rudd, C., Klaus, M., Kennell, J., & Boslett, M. (1981). Separation for Childbirth: The Effect on the Sibling. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 12, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706671 |
[33] | Wojciak, A. S., Range, B. P., Gutierrez, D. M., Hough, N. A., & Gamboni, C. M. (2018). Sibling Relationship in Foster Care: Foster Parent Perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 2590-2614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18758345 |
[34] | Yeh, H.-C., & Lempers, J. D. (2004). Perceived Sibling Relationships and Adolescent Development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013425.86424.0f |