全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

文字概率对自我–他人风险感知的影响
The Effect of Word Probability on Self-Other Risk Perception

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.123100, PP. 849-855

Keywords: 风险感知,文字概率,自我–他人差异
Risk Perception
, Word Probability, Self-Others Difference

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨文字概率对自我–他人风险感知的影响。方法:采用2 (结果效价:积极、消极) × 2 (对象:自我、他人) × 2 (风险概率:高概率、低概率) × 2 (领域:经济、健康)的混合实验设计,其中对象和结果效价为被试间因素,领域和风险概率为被试内因素。本研究基于实验设计编制调查问卷,对385名大学生被试进行调查。结果:健康领域消极风险结果发生在自我身上的概率估计显著低于他人(P = 0.015),而积极风险结果发生在自我身上的概率估计显著高于他人(P = 0.012),对经济领域消极和积极风险结果发生概率的估计没有显著的自我–他人差异(P均 > 0.05);健康和经济领域低概率积极风险结果和高概率消极风险结果的自我可控性评定显著(P健康领域均 < 0.05)或边缘显著(P经济低概率–积极 = 0.068, P经济高概率–消极 = 0.089)高于他人;积极风险结果发生的概率评定与风险结果可控性存在正相关(r = 0.227~0.292, P均 < 0.05);而消极风险结果发生的概率判断与可控性有负相关(r = ?0.204~?0.310, P均 < 0.05)。结论:相对于他人而言,文字风险概率对自我风险感知的影响较小,人们知觉到自己对风险结果有更高的可控性,而且人们对健康领域和经济领域的风险感知不同,因而提高风险预防行为要根据不同的领域从多方面来提高人们的风险感知。
Objective: To explore the effect of word probability on self-others risk perception. Methods: A mixed experimental design of 2 (outcome valence: positive, negative) × 2 (object: self, others) × 2 (risk probability: high probability, low probability) × 2 (field: economy, medical treatment) was adopted. Based on the experimental design, a risk situation questionnaire was developed to investigate 385 college students. Results: The probability of negative risk outcomes happening on self in the health field was significantly lower than others (P = 0.015), while the probability of positive risk outcomes happening on self was significantly higher than others (P = 0.012). There were no significant self-others differences in the estimation of the probability of risk outcomes in the economic field (Ps > 0.05). The controllability of self on low probability positive risk results and high probability negative risk results in health and the economic field was significant (Pshealth domain < 0.05) or marginally significant (Plow probability-positive = 0.068, Phigh probability-negative = 0.089) higher than others. In some conditions, the probability of positive risk result occurrence was positively correlated with the controllability (r = 0.227~0.292, Ps < 0.05), while the probability of negative risk result was negatively correlated with controllability (r = ?0.204~?0.310, Ps < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with others, word probability has less effect on risk perception of self, and people have different risk perceptions in the health and economic field. People perceived a higher sense of control over risk outcomes. Therefore, we should improve people’s risk perception from various aspects according to different fields to improve people’s prevention behavior.

References

[1]  岑延远(2016). 解释水平视角下的乐观偏差效应. 心理科学, 39(3), 553-558.
[2]  李诗韵, 杨颖雅, 黎铟铟, 黄丽玲, 岑延远(2017). 大学生合作竞争倾向与冒险行为倾向的关系研究——乐观偏差的中介作用. 教育现代化(电子版), (29), 178-181.
[3]  尹天子, 顾小稚, 陈庆菊, 吴倩(2017). 提示现实因素对乐观偏差的影响机制初探. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 35(6), 118-122.
[4]  尹天子, 黄希庭(2017). 保护因素和风险因素提示对乐观偏差的影响. 心理学探新, 37(5), 416-422.
[5]  Br?nstr?m, R., Kristjansson, S., & Ullén, H. (2006). Risk Perception, Optimistic Bias, and Readiness to Change Sun Related Behaviour. The European Journal of Public Health, 16, 492-497.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki193
[6]  Campbell, J., Greenauer, N., Macaluso, K., & End, C. (2007). Unrealistic Optimism in Internet Events. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1273-1284.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.005
[7]  Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2004). Biases in Social Comparative Judgments: The Role of Nonmotivated Factors in Above-Average and Comparative-Optimism Effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813-838.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813
[8]  Chambers, J. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (2003). Egocentrism, Event Frequency, and Comparative Optimism: When What Happens Frequently Is More Likely to Happen to Me? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1343-1356.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256870
[9]  Da Cunha, D. T., Braga, A. R. C., Passos, E. D. C. et al. (2015). The Existence of Optimistic Bias about Foodborne Disease by Food Handlers and Its Association with Training Participation and Food Safety Performance. Food Research International, 75, 27-e33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.035
[10]  Da Cunha, D. T., Stedefeldt, E., & Derosso, V. V. (2014). He Is Worse than I Am: The Positive Outlook of Food Handlers about Foodborne Disease. Food Quality and Preference, 35, 95-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.009
[11]  Ferrer, R. A., Klein, W. M. P., Zajac, L. E. et al. (2012). Unrealistic Optimism Is Associated with Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Health Psychology, 31, 815-820.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027675
[12]  Harris, P. (1996). Sufficient Grounds for Optimism? The Relationship be-tween Perceived Controllability and Optimistic Bias. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 9-52.
https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.9
[13]  Hevey, D., McGee, H. M., & Horgan, J. H. (2014). Comparative Optimism among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Is Associated with Fewer Adverse Clinical Events 12 Months Later. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 300-307.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9487-0
[14]  Hwang, Y., Park, Y. B., Yoon, H. K. et al. (2019). Male Current Smokers Have Low Awareness and Optimistic Bias about COPD: Field Survey Results about COPD in Korea. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 14, 271-277.
https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S189859
[15]  Klein, C. T. F., & Helweg-Larsen, M. (2002). Perceived Control and the Optimistic Bias: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychology and Health, 17, 437-446.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044022000004920
[16]  Masiero, M., Riva, S., Oliveri, S., Fioretti, C., & Pravettoni, G. (2018). Optimistic Bias in Young Adults for Cancer, Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases: A Pilot Study on Smokers and Drinkers. Journal of Health Psychology, 23, 645-656.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316667796
[17]  Park, J. S., & Ju, I. (2016). Prescription Drug Advertising, Disease Knowledge, and Older Adults’ Optimistic Bias about the Future Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease. Health Communication, 31, 346-354.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.957375
[18]  Rhee, H.-S., Ryu, Y. U., & Kim, C. (2012). Unrealistic Optimism on Information Security Management. Computers and Security, 31, 221-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2011.12.001
[19]  Rossi, M. D. S. C., Stedefeldt, E., Da Cunha, D. T., & de Rosso, V. V. (2017). Food Safety Knowledge, Optimistic Bias and Risk Perception among Food Handlers in Institutional Food Services. Food Control, 73, 681-688.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.016
[20]  Sharot, T., Korn, C. W., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). How Unrealistic Optimism Is Maintained in the Face of Reality. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1475-1479.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2949
[21]  Smits, T., & Hoorens, V. (2005). How probable Is Probably? It Depends on Whom You’re Talking about. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 83-96.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.485
[22]  Windschitl, P. D., & Wells, G. L. (1996). Measuring Psychological Uncertainty: Verbal versus Numeric Methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 343-364.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.2.4.343

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133