|
|
中国老年人面孔可信度加工的视觉特点：来自眼动的研究证据
|
Abstract:
以老年人为诈骗对象的刑事案件中，陌生人犯案占比重最大。为了进一步了解老年人受骗背后的心理机制，本研究采用眼动追踪技术，探究了中国老年人在对陌生人进行面孔可信度加工时的视觉特点。本研究包括两个实验：实验一通过操控面孔可信度来验证中国老年人面孔信任评价特点。实验二使用眼动技术，对老年人和青年人进行面孔可信度判断任务时的眼动数据进行实时记录，结合面孔再认测验进一步探究中国老年人面孔可信度加工过程中的视觉特点。结合实验一和实验二的研究结果发现：1) 相较于青年人，老年被试对中性面孔和不可信面孔的信任评价更为积极；2) 老年被试的首注视点更多地偏向于可信面孔，落在可信面孔上凝视时间、总注视时间以及注视点个数更多；3) 老年人再认可信面孔成绩好于不可信面孔。结果表明，相较于青年人，中国老年人存在轻信风险，更有可能受到陌生人的欺骗，且中国老年人存在对可信面孔的加工偏向和记忆优势。
Strangers account for the large proportion of criminal fraud targeting the elderly. To further un-derstand the psychological mechanism behind this phenomenon, this current study used eye movement tracking technology to explore the visual characteristics of the Chinese older adults in facial trustworthiness processing. This study consists of two experiments. In experiment 1, we used the face images with different facial trustworthiness to investigate the characteristics of the Chinese older adults in the face trust evaluation. In experiment 2, we used the eye movement tracking technology and the face recognition test to examine the visual perception processing characteristics and the memory of the trustworthy and untrustworthy face images by Chinese older adults. Combined the experiment 1 and experiment 2, we found that: 1) Chinese older adults have higher evolution of untrusted faces compared with young people; 2) Chinese older adults have a processing preference for trusted faces; 3) Chinese older adults show a memory advantage of the trusted faces. These results indicated that the Chinese older adults are more likely to be deceived by strangers than young people. In addition, compared with young people, older adults have a processing preference and a memory advantage for trusted faces.
| [1] | 高飞, 徐烨, 张红, 岑爱飞, 张林(2017). 老年人受骗状况及其影响因素. 中国老年学杂志, 37(8), 2037-2038. |
| [2] | 康廷虎, 白学军(2012). 任务类型和性别属性对人际信任的影响. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 456-462. |
| [3] | 彭玉伟(2015). 微表情分析技术在侦察询问工作中的应用研究. 中国刑事法杂志, (2), 95-103. |
| [4] | 王乾东, 李庆功, 陈凯凯, 傅根跃(2015). 不可信面孔在视觉加工中的注意偏向: 来自眼动的证据. 心理科学进展, 23(9), 1508-1513. |
| [5] | 吴捷(2008). 老年人社会支持、孤独感与主观幸福感的关系. 心理科学, 31(4), 984-986. |
| [6] | 徐芬, 蔡维香, 吴定诚, 马凤玲(2012a). 面孔信任评价及其与信任倾向的关系. 心理与行为研究, 11(4), 433-439. |
| [7] | 徐芬, 邹容, 马凤玲, 吴定诚(2012b). 大学生面孔信任评价的自动化加工. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 449-455. |
| [8] | 闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军(2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605. |
| [9] | 张坤坤, 张珂烨, 张火垠, 罗文波(2019). 面孔可信度加工的时间进程和影响因素. 心理科学进展, 27(8), 1394-1403. |
| [10] | Castle, E., Eisenberger, N. I., Seeman, T. E., Moons, W. G., Boggero, I. A., Grinblatt, M. S. et al. (2012). Neural and Behavioral Bases of Age Differences in Perceptions of Trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 20848-20852.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218518109 |
| [11] | Conrad, K. J., Iris, M., Ridings, J. W., Langley, K., & Wilber, K. H. (2010). Self-Report Measure of Financial Exploitation of Older Adults. The Gerontologist, 50, 758-773. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq054 |
| [12] | de Neys, W., Hopfensitz, A., & Bonnefon, J, F. (2017). Split-Second Trustworthiness Detection from Faces in an Economic Game. Experimental Psychology, 64, 231-239. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000367 |
| [13] | Dzhelyova, M., Perrett, D. I., & Jentzsch, I. (2012). Temporal Dynamics of Trustworthiness Perception. Brain Research, 1435, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.11.043 |
| [14] | Engell, A. D., Todorov, A., & Haxby, J. V. (2010). Common Neural Mechanisms for the Evaluation of Facial Trustworthiness and Emotional Expressions as Revealed by Behavioral Adaptation. Perception, 39, 931-941.
https://doi.org/10.1068/p6633 |
| [15] | Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, M. F. (2004). The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. Interface of Language Vision & Action Eye Movements & the Visual World, 6, 116-119. |
| [16] | Li, T., Liu, X., Pan, J., & Zhou, G. (2017). The Interactive Effect of Facial Appearance and Behavior Statement on Trust Belief and Trust Behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.038 |
| [17] | Lichtenberg, P. A., Stickney, L., & Paulson, D. (2013). Is Psychological Vulnerability Related to the Experience of Fraud in Older Adults? Clinical Gerontologist, 36, 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2012.749323 |
| [18] | Lischke, A., Junge, M., Hamm, A. O., & Weymar, M. (2018). Enhanced Processing of Untrustworthiness in Natural Faces with Neutral Expressions. Emotion, 18, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000318 |
| [19] | Martens, U., Leuthold, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2010). On the Temporal Organization of Facial Identity and Expression Analysis: Inferences from Event-Related Brain Potentials. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 505-522.
https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.4.505 |
| [20] | Marzi, T., Righi, S., Ottonello, S., Cincotta, M., & Viggiano, M. P. (2014). Trust at First Sight: Evidence from ERPs. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss102 |
| [21] | Ohmann, K., Stahl, J., Mussweiler, T., & Kedia, G. (2016). Immediate Relativity: EEG Reveals Early Engagement of Comparison in Social Information Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 145, 1512-1529.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000222 |
| [22] | Radke, S., Kalt, T., Wagels, L., & Derntl, B. (2018). Implicit and Explicit Motivational Tendencies to Faces Varying in Trustworthiness and Dominance in Men. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00008 |
| [23] | Schupp, H. T., Cuthbert, B. N., Bradley, M. M., Cacioppo, J. T., Ito, T., & Lang, P. (2004). Brain Processes in Emotional Perception: Motivated Attention. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000239 |
| [24] | Slepian, M. L., Young, S. G., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2017). An Approach-Avoidance Motivational Model of Trustworthiness Judgments. Motivation Science, 3, 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000046 |
| [25] | Stirrat, M. R., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust. Psychological Science, 21, 349-354.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647 |
| [26] | Suzuki, A. (2016). Persistent Reliance on Facial Appearance among Older Adults When Judging Someone’s Trustworthiness. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73, 573-583.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw034 |
| [27] | Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness: An Extension of Systems for Recognition of Emotions Signaling Approach/Avoidance Behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208-224.
https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.012 |
| [28] | Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. Science, 308, 1623-1626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1110589 |
| [29] | Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating Faces on Trustworthiness after Minimal Time Exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813-833. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813 |
| [30] | Zebrowitz, L. A., Boshyan, J., Ward, N., Hanlin, L., Wolf, J. M., & Hadjikhani, N. (2018). Dietary Dopamine Depletion Blunts Reward Network Sensitivity to Face Trustworthiness. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 32, 965-978.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118758303 |
| [31] | Zebrowitz, L. A., Franklin Jr, R. G., Hillman, S., & Boc, H. (2013). Older and Younger Adults’ First Impressions from Faces: Similar in Agreement but Different in Positivity. Psychology and Aging, 28, 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030927 |
| [32] | Zebrowitz, L. A., Ward, N., Boshyan, J., Gutchess, A., & Hadjikhani, N. (2017). Older Adults’ Neural Activation in the Reward Circuit Is Sensitive to Face Trustworthiness. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 21-34.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0549-1 |
