全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

川东南五峰–龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙结构特征及影响因素
Pore Structure Classification and Influence Factors of Shale Reservoir of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Southeast Sichuan

DOI: 10.12677/AG.2022.123031, PP. 298-309

Keywords: 川东南,页岩储层,氮气吸附,孔隙结构
Southeast Sichuan
, Shale Reservoir, Nitrogen Adsorption, Pore Structure

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

微观孔隙结构特征及孔隙结构的影响因素研究对川东南地区页岩储层评价具有非常重要的意义。本文基于低温氮气吸附实验,针对研究区目的层段页岩储层的微观孔隙结构特征开展研究,并分析其差异性。研究结果表明:川东南五峰–龙马溪组页岩储层的孔隙结构主要以微孔和中孔为主,孔隙形态主要表现为细颈广体的墨水瓶孔、四周开放的平行板状孔和不透气的封闭性孔,且微孔和中孔是比表面积和孔体积的主要贡献者,是页岩气聚集的主要空间。基于孔体积和比表面积与TOC含量和矿物成分的关系图分析发现,TOC和矿物成分是影响储层微观孔隙结构特征的重要因素,其中比表面积和孔体积与TOC含量和脆性矿物呈正相关,与黏土矿物呈负相关。
The study of microporous structure characteristics and influencing factors of pore structure is of great significance for the evaluation of shale reservoirs in southeast Sichuan. Based on the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption experiment, the microscopic pore structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the target strata section of the study area were studied and their differences were analyzed. The results show that the pore structure of the shale reservoir of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in southeast Sichuan is mainly microporous and medium pores, and the pore morphology is mainly manifested as ink bottle holes with fine necks and wide bodies, parallel plate pores and impermeable closed pores around them, and micropores and medium pores are the main contributors to the specific surface area and pore volume, and are the main space for shale gas aggregation. Based on the graph analysis of pore volume and specific surface area with TOC content and mineral composition, it is found that TOC and mineral composition are important factors affecting the microporous structure characteristics of reservoirs, of which specific surface area and pore volume are positively correlated with TOC content and brittle minerals, and negatively correlated with clay minerals.

References

[1]  武瑾, 梁峰, 吝文, 等. 渝东北地区龙马溪组页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自科版), 2016, 43(3): 308-319.
[2]  曾少军, 杨来, 曾凯超. 中国页岩气开发现状、问题及对策[J]. 中国人口资源与环境, 2013, 23(3): 33-38.
[3]  琚宜文, 姜波, 王桂梁, 等. 层滑构造煤岩体微观特征及其应力应变分析[J]. 地质科学, 2004, 39(1): 50-62.
[4]  焦堃, 姚素平, 吴浩, 等. 页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J]. 高校地质学报, 2014, 20(1): 151-161.
[5]  曾溅辉, 孙占强, 徐田武, 等. 大巴山前陆冲断带古水动力演化阶段及其对油气藏形成和保存的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(6): 1093-1101.
[6]  毛玲玲, 唐本锋, 朱正杰, 等. 重庆城口地区下寒武统黑色岩系有机地球化学特征及成因意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 2015, 35(3): 89-100.
[7]  陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等. 川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012, 37(3): 438-444.
[8]  武景淑, 于炳松, 张金川, 等. 渝东南渝页1井下志留统龙马溪组页岩孔隙特征及其主控因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(3): 260-269.
[9]  马新华, 杨雨, 文龙, 罗冰. 四川盆地海相碳酸盐岩大中型气田分布规律及勘探方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(1): 1-13.
[10]  冯国奇, 李吉君, 刘洁文, 等. 泌阳凹陷页岩油富集及可动性探讨[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1236-1246.
[11]  舒良树, 周新民, 邓平, 等. 中国东南部中新生代盆地特征与构造演化[J]. 地质通报, 2004, 23(9): 876-884.
[12]  李勃, 陈方文, 肖佃师, 等. 颗粒粒径对低温氮吸附实验的影响——以五峰组–龙马溪组海相含气页岩为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(2): 395-404.
[13]  李传明, 薛海涛, 王民等. 脱气温度和样品粒径对致密砂岩低温氮气吸附实验结果的影响[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2019, 38(2): 308-316.
[14]  郭旭升, 李宇平, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(6): 9-16.
[15]  姜振学, 唐相路, 李卓, 等. 川东南地区龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构全孔径表征及其对含气性的控制[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2): 126-134.
[16]  朱炎铭, 王阳, 陈尚斌, 等. 页岩储层孔隙结构多尺度定性–定量综合表征: 以上扬子海相龙马溪组为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(1): 154-163.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133