全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Physics behind the NASA Flyby Anomaly

DOI: 10.4236/opj.2022.123003, PP. 31-51

Keywords: NASA Fly-by, Non-Conservation of Energy, General Relativity, Vacuum Field, Planck’s Constant

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

From 1990 to 2005 NASA did six flybys of Earth in order to boost the energy of each spacecraft, enabling them to go deeper into the solar system. These six flybys showed an unexpected violation in the conservation of energy of up to 100 sigmas, matching a simple physical formula related to the input and output spacecraft velocities relative to the Earth rotational plane. Mysteriously, occasionally the effect was not present. After several years of reviewing the data and evaluating all sources of perturbation known to NASA, no solution was identified. NASA sent the final report to the author above for further review. Independently, the author’s firm Optical Physics Company had published research into the vacuum field, finding that it was not constant but varied across the Earth’s orbit and was also separately detected being radiated by the Sun. The physics we had learned was applied to the NASA passes, allowing all the anomalies they had encountered to be explained and adding considerably to our understanding of the vacuum field. We hypothesized a radially emitted vacuum field (which controls the rate of time) would couple the radial direction r with time t to add a gtr term in the metric tensor. We then combined the previously published experimental data of the vacuum field radiated by the Sun with the NASA data to develop a formula for the emission of the vacuum field from warm rotating bodies, accurate to about 1%. 25 candidate formulas were evaluated, based on powers of radial acceleration and temperature, and one was definitively selected. This research offers a linkage between the vacuum field whose spectrum is proportional to h and an effect on the metric tensor of gravity. Since both gravity and h control time rates, it seemed credible they could both affect the metric tensor.

References

[1]  Anderson, J.D., et al. (2008) Anomalous Orbital-Energy Changes Observed during Spacecraft Flybys of Earth. Physical Review Letters, 100, Article ID: 091102.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.091102
[2]  Casimir, H.B.G. (1948) On the Attraction between Two Perfectly Conducting Plates. Proceedings of Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen/C, 51, 793-795.
[3]  Bordag, M., Mohideen, U. and Mostepanenko, V.M. (2001) New Developments in the Casimir Effect. Physics Reports, 353, 1-205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00015-1
[4]  Siegert, H., Schrader, H. and Schötzig, U. (1998) Half-Life Measurements of Europium Radionuclides and the Long-Term Stability of Detectors. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 49, 1397-1401.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(97)10082-3
[5]  Ellis, K.J. (1990) The Effective Half-Life of a Broad Beam 238Pu/Be Total Body Neutron Radiator. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 35, 1079-1088.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/35/8/004
[6]  Falkenberg, E.D. (2001) Radioactive Decay Caused by Neutrinos? Apeiron, 8, 32-45.
[7]  Alburger, D.E., Harbottle, G. and Norton, E.F. (1986) Half-Life of 32Si. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 78, 168-176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(86)90058-0
[8]  Jenkins, J.H., et al. (2011) Analysis of Experiments Exhibiting Time-Varying Nuclear Decay Rates: Systematic Effects or New Physics?
https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.1678
[9]  Parkhomov, A.G. (2010) Researches of Alpha and Beta Radioactivity at Long-Term Observations.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.1761
[10]  McDuffie, M.H., Graham, P., Eppele, J.L., Gruenwald, J.T., Javorsek II, D., Krause, D.E., Fischbach1, E. (2020) Anomalies in Radioactive Decay Rates: A Bibliography of Measurements and Theory.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00153v2
[11]  Hutchin, R.A. (2016) Experimental Evidence for Variability in Planck’s Constant. Optics and Photonics Journal, 6, 124-137.
https://www.scirp.org/journal/opj/
[12]  Hutchin, R.A. (2019) Detection of Casimir Radiation from the Sun. Optical Society of America Technical Digest, 2019, paper JTu4A.26.
https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=FiO-2019-JTu4A.26
[13]  Hutchin, R.A. (2019) Detection of Casimir Radiation from Our Sun. Optics and Photonics Journal, 9, 141-154.
https://doi.org/10.4236/opj.2019.99013
[14]  Adler, R., Bazin, M. and Schiffer, M. (1975) Introduction to General Relativity. McGraw Hill, New York.
[15]  Hutchin, R.A. (2015) Toward a Local Theory of Light. Optics and Photonics Journal, 5, 247-259.
https://doi.org/10.4236/opj.2015.57024
[16]  King, J.A. (2010) Searching for Variations in the Fine-Structure Constant and the Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio Using Quasar Absorption Lines. Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Wales, South Wales.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.042523
[17]  Webb, J.K., Flambaum, V.V., Churchill, C.W., Drinkwater, M.J. and Barrow, J.D. (1998) A Search for Time Variation of the Fine Structure Constant.
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9803165
[18]  Haddad, D., et al. (2017) Measurement of the Planck Constant at the National Institute of Standards and Technology from 2015 to 2017. Metrologia, 54, 633-641.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aa7bf2
[19]  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faint_young_Sun_paradox
[20]  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_ocean_hypothesis
[21]  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain
[22]  Pound, R.V. and Rebka Jr., G.A. (1959) Gravitational Red-Shift in Nuclear Resonance. Physical Review Letters, 3, 439-441.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.439

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133