全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

将来情节想象对道德行为意向的影响:道德感知的中介作用
The Influence of Episodic Future Thought on Moral Behavioral Intention: The Mediating Role of Moral Perception

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.123079, PP. 670-680

Keywords: 将来情节想象,道德行为意向,道德感知,道德许可理论
Episodic Future Thought
, Moral Behavioral Intention, Moral Perception, Moral License Theory

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:本文在已有研究的基础上,考察有无想象和事件性质对不同道德行为意向的影响,以及检验道德感知的中介效应。方法:本研究设计了两个实验:实验一,考察有无想象(有想象,无想象)与事件性质(亲手,非亲手)对道德行为意向的影响;实验二,考察有无想象对道德行为意向的影响,检验道德感知的中介作用。结果:研究表明有无想象的主效应显著,无想象条件下的被试比有想象条件下的被试有更强的时间助人意向;事件性质的主效应显著,非亲手条件下的被试比亲手条件下的被试有更强的时间和行为助人意向;有无想象与事件性质的交互作用显著,无想象非亲手条件下被试的金钱助人意向最强;有无想象影响行为助人意向和道德感知,道德感知是有无想象道德行为助人意向的中介变量。结论:将来情节想象启动了个体的道德许可效应,降低了不同性质的道德行为意向;道德感知中介了将来情节想象对道德助人的行为意向。
Objective: Based on the previous research, this paper investigated the influence of imagination and nature of events on moral behavioral intention, and examined the mediating role of moral perception. Methods: Two experiments are designed in this paper. Experiment 1 investigated the influence of imagination and the nature of events on moral intention. Experiment 2 examined the mediating effect of imagination on moral behavior intention and tested the mediating role of moral perception. Results: The research showed that the main effect of imagination was significant, and the subjects without imagination had stronger time helping intention than those with imagination. The main effect of the nature of the event was significant, and the subjects under the non-hand condition had stronger time and behavior intention to help others than those under the hand condition. The interaction between imagination and the nature of the event was significant, and the subjects’ intention to help others with money was the strongest under the condition of non-imagination and non-hand. Whether there was imagination or not, the behavior helping intention and moral perception was affected, and moral perception was an intermediary variable of behavior helping intention. Conclusion: Episodic future thought starts the individual’s moral license effect and reduces the moral behavior intention of different natures; moral perception mediates the intention of future plot imagination to moral help.

References

[1]  付慧欣(2006). 初中生道德判断能力、同情心对其助人倾向的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 呼和浩特: 内蒙古师范大学.
[2]  高琳(2015). 道德调节的负反馈机制对大学生集体行动及集群行为倾向的影响. 硕士学位论文, 长春: 吉林大学.
[3]  关涛(2017). 员工为什么先好而后坏: 基于道德许可的理论分析框架. 外国经济与管理, 39(6), 98-112.
[4]  黄晓婷(2012). 中学生心理复原力在同伴不良对待与主观幸福感之间关系中的调节效应及对教育的启示. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津师范大学.
[5]  雷霞(2015). 黑白分明: 黑白视觉对比极化道德判断. 硕士学位论文, 桂林: 广西师范大学.
[6]  李谷, 周晖, 丁如一(2013). 道德自我调节对亲社会行为和违规行为的影响. 心理学报, 45(6), 672-679.
[7]  李光辉(1991). 论道德意向在个体道德活动中的主导作用. 重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (2), 70-75.
[8]  李宏翰, 温舒雯(2017). 道德判断研究的历史、现状与展望. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 53(4), 91-98.
[9]  李继波(2014). 时间定价对亲社会行为的影响及其心理机制. 博士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[10]  李婧怡(2012). 弃善从恶: 道德许可对不道德的影响及其心理机制. 硕士学位论文, 桂林: 广西师范大学.
[11]  罗扬眉, 黄希庭, 鞠恩霞, 普彬(2010). 将来事件情节模拟的神经基础. 西南大学学报?社会科学版, 36(5), 21-27.
[12]  罗扬眉, 黄希庭, 李宝林, 张建人(2013). 将来情节想象对事件发生主观可能性的影响. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 39(6), 79-85.
[13]  石伟(2011). 道德心理许可述评. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1233-1241.
[14]  舒首立(2011). 时间距离对道德判断和行为意向的影响. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[15]  苏畅(2014). 论道德感知. 硕士学位论文, 苏州: 苏州科技学院.
[16]  吴先琦(2013). 金钱概念启动对志愿行为的影响研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[17]  吴志洪(2016). 道德自我调节: 补偿性还是一致性?——基于道德认同和道德自我知觉的研究. 硕士学位论文, 长沙:湖南师范大学.
[18]  殷融(2014). 道德概念黑白隐喻表征的心理现实性. 博士学位论文, 南京: 南京师范大学.
[19]  张福如(2009). 布鲁姆道德感知与特殊性理论及其意义. 学理论, (16), 14-17.
[20]  周恒洋(2011). 高校大学生网络道德失范行为意向评价研究. 硕士学位论文, 广州: 华南理工大学.
[21]  Caruso, E. M., & Gino, F. (2011). Blind Ethics: Closing One’s Eyes Polarizes Moral Judgements and Discourages Dishonest Behavior. Cognition, 118, 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.008
[22]  Conway, P., & Peetz, J. (2012). When Does Feeling Moral Actually Make You a Better Person? Conceptual Abstraction Moderates Whether Past Moral Deeds Motivate Consistency or Compensatory Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 907-919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212442394
[23]  Gaesser, B., DiBiase, H. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2017). A Role for Affect in the Link between Episodic Simulation and Prosocial. Memory, 25, 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1254246
[24]  Gaesser, B., Horn, M., & Young, L. (2015). When Can Imaging the Self Increase Willingness to Help Others? Investigating Whether the Self-Referential Nature of Episodic Simulation Foster Prosociality. Social Cognition, 33, 562-584. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.6.562
[25]  Gaesser, B., Keeper, K., & Young, L. (2018). Moral Imagination: Facilitating Prosocial Decision-Making through Scene Imagery and Theory of Mind. Cognition, 171, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.004
[26]  Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystorm, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
[27]  Huberts, J. C., Evers, C., & Ridder, D. T. (2012). License to Sin: Self-Licensing as a Mechanism Underlying Hedonic Consumption. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 490-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.861
[28]  Lawrence, B. (1991). Moral Perception and Particularity. Ethics, 101, 701-725. https://doi.org/10.1086/293340
[29]  Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral Credentials and the Expression of Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
[30]  Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., & Szpunar, K. K. (2017). Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions. Current Opinion Behavioral Sciences, 17, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.002

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133