全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于AHP-FCE模型的课程思政教学质量评价
Evaluation of Curriculum Ideological and Political Education Based on AHP-FCE

DOI: 10.12677/CES.2022.102062, PP. 356-364

Keywords: 课程思政,教学评价,层次分析法,模糊综合评价
Curriculum Ideological and Political Education
, Teaching Evaluation, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

课程思政的实施对学生的知识传授、能力培养与价值引领起到非常重要的作用,而对教学质量的评价是课程思政教学体系中重要的环节。在文献研究、问卷调查、访谈交流以及充分调研的基础上,采用5个二级指标,16个三级指标,构建了课程思政教学质量评价指标体系。运用层次分析法(AHP)确定各指标的权重、运用模糊综合评价法(FCE)获取各个指标的综合评价结果,提高了评价结果的真实性和有效性,可以在一定程度上促进教师课程思政育人能力的提升。
The implementation of curriculum ideological and political education plays an important role in imparting knowledge, cultivating ability and leading value of students, and the evaluation of teaching quality is an important link in the system. On the basis of literature research, question-naire survey, interview and full investigation, the evaluation index system of curriculum ideological and political education is constructed by using 5 secondary indexes and 16 tertiary indexes. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to determine the weight of each index, and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) is used to obtain the comprehensive evaluation results of each index, which improves the authenticity and validity of the evaluation results, and promotes the improvement of teachers’ ability of curriculum ideological and political education.

References

[1]  把思想政治工作贯穿教育教学全过程 开创我国高等教育事业发展新局面[N]. 人民日报, 2016-12-09(001).
[2]  中共教育部党组. 中共教育部党组关于印发《高校思想政治工作质量提升工程实施纲要》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A12/s7060/201712/t20171206_320698.html, 2017-12-05.
[3]  王飞, 唐杰, 庄敏. “三全育人”背景下课程思政与专业课融合教学效果评价[J]. 中学政治教学参考, 2021(39): 35-37.
[4]  崔燕. 课程思政理念下大学英语教学质量评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国多媒体与网络教学学报(上旬刊), 2021(10): 116-118.
[5]  任俊圣. “课程思政”内涵的演进及其体用的发展[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(1): 78-85.
https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2022.101015
[6]  孙跃东, 曹海艳, 袁馨怡. 理工科课程思政教学评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(6): 77-88+112.
[7]  吴清. 基于李克特量表的消费养老方式认知度调查[J]. 技术与市场, 2013, 20(8): 188-190.
[8]  Arulbalaji, P., Padmalal, D. and Sreelash, K. (2019) GIS and AHP Techniques Based Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones: A Case Study from Southern Western Ghats India. Scientific Reports, 9, Article Number: 2082, 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38567-x
[9]  胡永宏, 贺思辉. 综合评价方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
[10]  周业付. 基于AHP-FCE模型的农产品供应链绩效评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2020(23): 178-180.
[11]  任玉丹. 数学课堂教学评估指标体系构建[J]. 教育科学研究, 2021(11): 33-39.
[12]  侯勇, 钱锦. 课程思政研究的现状、评价与创新[J]. 江苏大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(6): 66-76.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133