|
电子厂流水线工人应对方式和抑郁的关系研究
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨电子厂流水线工人抑郁与应对方式的关系。方法:随机抽取流水线工人3260人填写《简易应对方式量表》和《流调中心用抑郁自评量表》进行调查。结果:1) 不同文化程度的流水线工人在抑郁水平上差异显著(p < 0.01);2) 不同婚姻状态的流水线工人在抑郁水平上差异显著(p < 0.05);3) 不同性别的流水线工人在消极应对上差异显著(p < 0.05);4) 不同文化程度的流水线工人在积极应对上差异显著(p < 0.01);5) 不同婚姻状态的流水线工人在消极应对上差异显著(p < 0.05);6) 流水线工人在抑郁水平与积极应对上有显著的负相关关系(r = ?0.349, p < 0.01),在抑郁水平与消极应对上有显著的正相关关系(r = 0.237, p < 0.01),并且积极应对对抑郁有负向预测作用,消极应对对抑郁有正向预测作用。
Objective: To explore the relationship between depression and coping style of assembly line workers in an electronics factory. Methods: 3260 assembly line workers were randomly selected to fill out the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) and Center for Epidemiological Studies Survey Depression Scale (CES-D). Results: 1) There were significant differences in depression among assembly line workers in different levels of education (p < 0.01); 2) There were significant differences in depression among assembly line workers in different marital states (p < 0.05); 3) There were significant differences in negative coping style among assembly line workers in different genders (p < 0.05); 4) There were significant differences in positive coping style among assembly line workers in different levels of education (p < 0.01); 5) There were significant differences in negative coping style among assembly line workers in different marital states (p < 0.05); 6) There was a significant negative correlation between depression and positive coping style among assembly line workers (r = ?0.349, p < 0.01) and a significant positive correlation between depression and negative coping style among assembly line workers (r = 0.237, p < 0.01). Besides, positive coping style has a significant negative predictive effect on depression and negative coping style has a significant positive predictive effect on depression.
[1] | 刘峻良, 任芬, 房玉上(2018). 流调中心抑郁量表在成人群体中的模型比较. 心理学进展, 8(12), 1829-1837. |
[2] | 宋玉萍, 李敬田, 孙宏伟, 隋萍, 李爱英(2009). 冠心病患者认知和应对方式与抑郁情绪的关系. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 18(2), 124-125. |
[3] | 王瑾, 刘晓曼, 王超, 李霜(2019). 电子制造服务业流水线员工心理资本在职业紧张与抑郁症状间中介效应. 中国职业医学, 46(3), 280-285. |
[4] | 王丽卿, 李巧, 杨雅莹, 朱慧全(2018). 2015年海口市中小学生生活事件、应对方式与抑郁的关系. 卫生研究, 47(6), 942-946. |
[5] | 邢超, 屠春雨, 谈荣梅, 傅利军, 方益荣, 李明, 周国俊(2011). 青少年应对方式与抑郁焦虑情绪的关联. 中国学校卫生, 32(12), 1449-1451. |
[6] | 熊戈(2015). 简版流调中心用抑郁量表在我国青少年中的效度. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学. |
[7] | 杨轶冰, 鲁峰(2009). 应对方式与大学生焦虑、抑郁关系调查. 淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 30(4), 151-154. |
[8] | 张月娟, 阎克乐, 王进礼(2005). 生活事件、负性自动思维及应对方式影响大学生抑郁的路径分析. 心理发展与教育, 21(1), 96-99. |
[9] | 章金辉, 严伟良, 占建华(2005). 老年人应对方式与抑郁的相关性研究. 中华老年医学杂志, 24(7), 529-530. |
[10] | Haghatgou, H., & Peterson, C. (1995). Coping Depressive Symptoms among Iranian Students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 175-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1995.9711420 |