“医院–社区–家庭”一体化护理照顾模式在肾移植术后患者的应用效果研究
Study on the Application Effect of “Hospital-Community-Family” Integrated Nursing Care Model on Patients after Renal Transplantation

DOI: 10.12677/NS.2022.111018, PP. 95-100

Keywords: 医院–社区–家庭，肾移植，生活质量
Hospital-Community-Family, Kidney Transplantation, Quality of Life

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的：探讨“医院–社区–家庭”一体化护理照顾模式在肾移植术后患者的应用效果。方法：选取2017年5月~2017年10月在本院进行肾移植术后患者38例作为对照组，2017年11月~2018年3月在本院进行肾移植术后患者46例作为干预组，对照组在院内给予常规手术后护理干预，干预组在对照组基础上采用“医院–社区–家庭”一体化护理照顾模式进行干预，比较两组患者术后3个月的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、生活功能、心理健康指标和营养状况。结果：干预组的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、生活功能、心理健康指标均显著高于对照组，有统计学意义(P < 0.05)；术后三个月，干预组的营养状况显著优于对照组，有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论：“医院–社区–家庭”一体化护理照顾模式可显著改善肾移植术后患者生活质量，对于降低并发症的发生，改善营养情况有重要临床价值。
Objective: To explore the application effect of “hospital-community-family” integrated nursing care model in patients after kidney transplantation. Methods: 38 patients after renal transplantation in our hospital from May 2017 to October 2017 were selected as the control group, and 46 patients after renal transplantation in our hospital from November 2017 to March 2018 were selected as the intervention group. The control group was given routine post-operative nursing intervention in the hospital, and the intervention group was intervened in the “hospital-community-family” integrated nursing care model on the basis of the control group. The physiological function, physiological function, physical pain, life function, mental health indexes and nutritional status of the two groups were compared 3 months after operation. Results: Three months after operation, the indexes of physiological function, physiological function, physical pain, life function, and mental health in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05); the nutritional status of the intervention group was significantly better than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The “hospital-community-family” integrated nursing care model can significantly improve the quality of life of patients after kidney transplantation, and has important clinical value in reducing the incidence of complications and improving nutrition.

References

[1]	滕沙, 刘红霞, 彭晓, 等. 活体肾移植供者生活质量的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(8): 973-976.
[2]	刘锋, 朱有华. 肾移植操作技术规范(2019版)——适应证、禁忌证、术前检查和准备[J]. 器官移植, 2019, 10(5): 469-472+482.
[3]	刘佳, 严谨, 叶啟发, 等. 健康教育路径在肾移植患者中的实施及效果评价[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2014, 39(1): 78-83．
[4]	Ware, J.E. and Sherbourne, C.D. (1992) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
[5]	滕沙, 刘红霞, 林晓鸿, 等. 认知行为干预提高肾移植术后患者服药依从性效果的系统分析[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2015, 15(1): 60-70.
[6]	范林, 叶啟发, 钟自彪, 等. 血清降钙素原检测对于肾移植术后肺部感染的诊断价值[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(4): 195-199.
[7]	黄丽婷, 刘陈静, 陶小琴, 等. 肾移植术后患者生活质量调查研究[J]. 护理学报, 2011, 18(16): 11-13.
[8]	张玉兰, 叶桂荣, 姚琳, 等. 肾移植病人营养特点分析与对策[J]. 护理研究, 2008, 22(2): 127-128.
[9]	Zelle, D.M., Kok, T., Dontje, M.L., et al. (2013) The Role of Diet and Physical Activity in Post-Transplant Weight Gain after Renal Trans-plantation. Clinical Transplantation, 27, 484-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12149
[10]	孟晓云, 王泽颖, 张燕, 唐莎．护理干预对肾移植术后患者血糖水平的影响研究[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2011, 8(24): 1-2．
[11]	卫生部. 中国护理事业发展规划纲要(2011-2015年) [J]. 中国护理管理, 2012, 12(2): 5-8.
[12]	国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 关于进一步深化优质护理、改善护理服务的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/cms-search/xxgk/getManuscriptXxgk.htm?id=7bfe482ac571419e9e901909180d9916, 2015-03-17.
[13]	黄云霞, 王丹志. 基于J2EE的延伸护理系统的设计与实现[J]. 软件, 2016, 37(1): 32-37.
[14]	米元元, 沈月, 黄海燕, 喻姣花, 罗健. ICU患者肠内营养并发腹泻证据汇总[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(21): 58-66.
[15]	杨晓燕, 向丽华. 喉癌术后患者医院–社区–家庭一体化照顾模式的构建与实施[J]. 当代护士(中旬刊), 2016(9): 70-72.
[16]	曾莉, 朱晓萍, 陈亚梅, 等. 我国“医院–社区–家庭”慢性病连续性照护服务制约因素的研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2015, 29(4): 1281-1284.
[17]	杨海苓, 王萍, 侯文秀, 等. 医院–社区–家庭三元联动延续护理平台的设计及应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016, 51(9): 1133-1137.

Full-Text