全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Bipolar Transurethral Prostate Resection: A Study of 112 Cases

DOI: 10.4236/oju.2022.122012, PP. 117-128

Keywords: Bipolar Transurethral Prostate Resection, Prostatism, Quality of Life, Irrigation Fluid, Large Prostate Glands

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: With the advancement of technology, prostate resection can be performed nowadays using endoscopic techniques, which include monopolar and bipolar transurethral prostate resection. This study aimed to evaluate the results of bipolar transurethral prostate resection in a single urology center in Cameroon. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out over two years (2015-2017) involving 112 patients with symptomatic prostate diseases who underwent transurethral prostate resection with the help of a bipolar Olympus generator. Results: The ages of the participants ranged from 44 years to 85 years, with a mean age of 64.41 ± 9.5 years. Fifty-six (50%) patients presented with only obstructive symptoms, five (4.46%) had only irritative symptoms, twenty (17.86%) presented with both obstructive and irritative symptoms, eight (7.14%) presented with macroscopic hematuria, seven (6.25%) with urinary tract infections, and sixteen (14.29%) with acute urinary retention. Digital rectal examination was unremarkable in 74 (66.07%) findings and was positive in 38 (33.93%) patients. The median prostate diameter was 70 [59 - 86.5] mm. The mean preoperative IPSS was 24.46 ± 5.68. The mean surgery duration was 77.61 ± 23.87 minutes. The mean volume of irrigation fluid used during surgery was 24.84 ± 6.40 ml. The differences between the preoperative and postoperative mean IPPS score, maximum urine flow rate, and quality of life were statistically significant (all P < 0.001). Only 4 (3.57%) of the study participants experienced postoperative complications. Conclusion: Bipolar transurethral prostate resection is a viable alternative to open surgery or laparoscopic surgery for large prostate glands. This technique is also associated with a reduction in prostate-related morbidity.

References

[1]  Mitterberger, M., Horninger, W., Aigner, F., Pinggera, G.M., Steppan, I., Rehder, P., et al. (2010) Ultrasound of the Prostate. Cancer Imaging, 10, 40-48.
https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0004
[2]  Xia, S.-J., Cui, D. and Jiang, Q. (2012) An Overview of Prostate Diseases and Their Characteristics Specific to Asian Men. Asian Journal of Andrology, 14, 458-464.
https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.137
[3]  Lepor, H. (2005) Pathophysiology of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in the Aging Male Population. Reviews in Urology, 7, S3-S11.
[4]  Kim, S.W. (2011) Prostatic Disease and Sexual Dysfunction. Korean Journal of Urology, 52, 373-378.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2011.52.6.373
[5]  Turkbey, B., Pinto, P.A. and Choyke, P.L. (2009) Imaging Techniques for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Focal Therapy. Nature Reviews Urology, 6, 191-203.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2009.27
[6]  Gretzer, M.B. and Partin, A.W. (2003) PSA Markers in Prostate Cancer Detection. Urologic Clinics of North America, 30, 677-686.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(03)00057-0
[7]  Miernik, A. and Gratzke, C. (2020) Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 117, 843-854.
https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0843
[8]  Smith, R.D. and Patel, A. (2011) Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Revisited and Updated. Current Opinion in Urology, 21, 36-41.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283411455
[9]  Hueber, P.-A., Al-Asker, A. and Zorn, K.C. (2011) Monopolar vs. Bipolar TURP: Assessing Their Clinical Advantages. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 5, 390-391.
https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.11263
[10]  Madduri, V.K.S., Bera, M. and Pal, D.K. (2016) Monopolar versus Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Operative Outcomes and Surgeon Preferences, a Real-World Scenario. Urology Annals, 8, 291-296.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.184900
[11]  Tang, Y., Li, J., Pu, C., Bai, Y., Yuan, H., Wei, Q., et al. (2014) Bipolar Transurethral Resection versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Endourology, 28, 1107-1114.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0188
[12]  Mamoulakis, C. and Oelke, M. (2018) Chapter 6. Diagnostic Work-Up of LUTS/BPH: From Standard to New Perspectives. In: Morgia, G. and Russo, G.I., Eds., Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Academic Press, Cambridge, 113-133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811397-4.00006-8
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128113974000068
[13]  Pogula, V. and Galeti, E. (2021) A Prospective Comparative Study on the Operative Outcomes between Monopolar Versus Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Institutional Experience. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 12, 125-132.
https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v12i11.38923
[14]  Liu, C.-C., Huang, S.-P., Chou, Y.-H., Wang, C.-J. and Huang, C.-H. (2003) Current Indications for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Associated Complications. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 19, 49-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70448-6
[15]  Jeje, E.A., Alabi, T.O., Ojewola, R.W., Ogunjimi, M.A., Tijani, K.H. and Asiyanbi, G.K. (2021) Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Using Water as the Irrigation Fluid: Our Initial Experience. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 28, 175-180.
https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_502_21
[16]  Mertziotis, N., Kozyrakis, D., Kyratsas, C. and Konandreas, A. (2015) A Prospective Study of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate Comparing the Efficiency and Safety of the Method in Large and Small Adenomas. Advances in Urology, 2015, Article ID: 251879.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/251879
[17]  Sugihara, T., Yasunaga, H., Horiguchi, H., Nakamura, M., Nishimatsu, H., Kume, H., et al. (2012) In-Hospital Outcomes and Cost Assessment between Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. Journal of Endourology, 26, 1053.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0592
[18]  Ketabchi, A.A., Ketabchi, M. and Barkam, M. (2013) The Effect of Modified TURP (M-TURP) in Intra and Postoperative Complications. Nephro-Urology Monthly, 5, 758-761.
https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.6607
[19]  Miyazato, M., Yoshimura, N. and Chancellor, M.B. (2013) The Other Bladder Syndrome: Underactive Bladder. Reviews in Urology, 15, 11-22.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133