|
阿荣旗聚落地名景观分类及空间分布特征
|
Abstract:
以阿荣旗为例,运用数理统计法和GIS空间分析法,从文化景观的视角对研究区聚落地名景观的空间分布特征进行分析,从而揭示阿荣旗聚落地名中蕴含的丰富社会历史文化特征。结果表明:从数量分布特征看,阿荣旗聚落地名以人文景观类地名为主,占地名总数的62.02%。从集聚性特征看,研究区在整体上聚落地名集聚性特征显著,在各类地名中分别以地形地貌类和红色类地名集聚性较强。从多尺度空间特征看,研究区各类型地名均呈单峰分布,随着距离的增加,集聚程度先增大后减小。从空间分布特征看,阿荣旗各类型地名呈“东南密、西北疏”的空间特征,非均衡性特征显著。其中自然景观类地名密度高值区集中于中部,呈单核分布特征,人文景观类地名密度高值区集中于东南半部,呈多核分布特征。
Taking Arun Banner as an example, we use mathematical statistics and GIS spatial analysis method to classify place names, and analyze the spatial distribution characteristics of the place name in the study area from the perspective of cultural landscape, revealing the rich social, historical and cultural characteristics contained in the Arun Banner. The results show that: from the perspective of quantitative distribution characteristics, the land names of Arun Banner are dominated by human landscape land names, accounting for 62.02% of the total land names. From the perspective of agglomeration characteristics, the study area has obvious characteristics of agglomeration of name clusters as a whole. Among the various types of place names, topographic and geomorphic and red place names have strong agglomeration. From the perspective of multi-scale spatial characteristics, all types of place names in the study area have a unimodal distribution. As the distance increases, the degree of agglomeration first increases and then decreases. From the perspective of spatial distribution characteristics, the various types of place names in Arun Banner show the spatial characteristics of “dense in the southeast and sparse northwest”, with significant imbalance characteristics. Among them, the high-density areas of natural landscape place names are concentrated in the middle, showing a single-core distribution, and the high-density areas of human landscape place names are concentrated in the southeastern half, showing a multi-core distribution.
[1] | 朱竑. 从地名看开疆文化在海南岛的传播扩散[J]. 地理科学, 2001(1): 89-93. |
[2] | 中国大百科全书总编辑委员会《地理学》编辑委员会. 中国大百科全书. 地理学·地名条[M]. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1992. |
[3] | Jett, S.C. (1997) Place-Naming, Environment, and Perception among the Canyon de Chelly Navajo of Arizona. The Professional Geographer, 49, 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00094 |
[4] | Gill, G. (2005) Changing Symbols: The Renovation of Moscow Place Names. The Russian Review, 64, 480-503.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9434.2005.00371.x |
[5] | 王彬, 司徒尚纪. 基于GIS的广东地名景观分析[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(2): 238-248. |
[6] | 王彬, 岳辉. GIS支持的广东地名景观EOF模型分析[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(2): 281-288. |
[7] | 陈晨, 修春亮, 陈伟, 等. 基于GIS的北京地名文化景观空间分布特征及其成因[J]. 地理科学, 2014, 34(4): 420-429. |
[8] | 王莹莹, 王英杰, 张桐艳, 等. 三大平原区县级地名演变研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2019, 44(11): 74-80. |
[9] | 孙冬虎. 华北平原城镇地名群的发展及其地理分布特征[J]. 地理研究, 1990(3): 49-56. |
[10] | 王涛, 李君, 陈长瑶, 等. 高原湖泊平坝区乡村“涉水”地名文化景观分析——以环滇池地区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(12): 231-239. |
[11] | 魏书威, 郭昳岚, 卫天杰, 等. 绿洲乡村地名文化景观的分布特征?成因分析及现实启示——以民勤绿洲为例[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(2): 22-28. |
[12] | 李建华, 米文宝, 冯翠月, 等. 基于GIS的宁夏中卫县地名文化景观分析[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1): 100-104. |
[13] | 朱竑, 周军, 王彬. 城市演进视角下的地名文化景观——以广州市荔湾区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 829-837. |
[14] | 孙百生, 郭翠恩, 杨依天, 等. 基于GIS的承德乡村地名文化景观空间分布特征[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(2): 244-251. |
[15] | Zhang, S.R., Wang, Y.J., Ju, H.R., et al. (2018) Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Interprovincial Terrestrial Physical Geographical Names in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28, 1845-1859. |
[16] | 孙美丽, 曾佩枫, 张海平, 等. 济南市村落地名文化景观空间分布特征及成因分析[J]. 测绘科学技术学报, 2020, 37(3): 319-324. |
[17] | 苏都尔, 那顺达来, 其力木格, 等. 基于GIS的内蒙古半农半牧区地名景观空间分布特征研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(6): 1648-1656. |
[18] | 东方杰, 那顺达来, 苏都尔. 新疆多语种地名空间分布特征研究[J]. 世界地理研究, 2021, 30(5): 1106-1114. |
[19] | 涂平, 周千千. 福州地名文化景观空间分布特征与影响因素[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(2): 199-206. |
[20] | 李勋, 马金辉. 基于GIS的榆林市乡镇地名分布特征研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2017, 40(3): 46-49. |
[21] | 王盼, 王宏卫, 杨胜天, 等. 基于GIS的天山北坡聚落地名文化景观分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(2): 516-524. |