全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

气浮-A2/O-MBR工艺处理校园污水研究——以西安思源学院为例
Gas Float-A2/O-MBR Process on Campus Wastewater Treatment—Taking Xi’an Siyuan College as an Example

DOI: 10.12677/HJCET.2022.121005, PP. 32-39

Keywords: 气浮,MBR工艺,校园污水,膜污染
Gas Float
, MBR Process, Campus Sewage, Membrane Pollution

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

西安思源学院现运行着4000 m3/天规模的气浮-A2/O-MBR工艺处理校园污水的再生水厂。气浮池内加入定量聚丙烯酰胺与聚合氯化铝混合絮凝剂。为了研究气浮池与MBR膜生物反应器组合优势,对“进水”、“调节池”、“气浮池”和“出水”取样,并检测COD,氨氮,总氮,总磷,动植物油,pH六种项目。计算多次重复测试数据的算术平均值和标准偏差。比较“进水”与“调节池”的标准偏差得到:经过调节池的均质均量,COD的标准偏差下降了近43%,动植物油的标准偏差下降了近77%。比较“调节池”与“气浮池”的测试数据,可以得出通过气浮池,COD下降41.2%,TP下降25.3%和动植物油下降54.5%。从目前测试数据比较来看,在短期内,有无气浮池对MBR膜生物反应器的出水质量影响不明显。因为西安思源学院再生水厂的规模、目的和极限与其它实验室研究不同,所以除了加强混合絮凝剂的选择和性价比的评估方面的研究外,重点将放在对于系统长期的科学观察、科学测试、数据的搜集和整理。
Xi’an Siyuan University now operates a 4000 m3/day gas float-A2/O-MBR process to treat campus sewage. Polyacrylamide and polymer aluminum chloride as the mixed flocculants was added to the gas float tank. To investigate the advantages of the combination of gas float tank with MBR biofilm bioreactors, “feed water”, “regulating pool”, “gas floating tank”, and “effluent” were sampled, and COD, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, animal and plant oil, and pH were tested. The arithmetic mean and standard deviation of the data from multiple repeated tests were calculated. After the homogenization of the regulatory pool, the standard deviation of “feed water” and “regulating pool” showed that: the standard deviation of COD decreased by nearly 43%, and that of animal and plant oil decreased by nearly 77%. Comparison of test data from “regulating pools” to “gas floating tank” yielded a 41.2% decrease in COD, 25.3% in TP, and a 54.5% decrease in animal and plant oil. From the comparison of the current test data, there is no effect of gas float tank on the effluent quality of the MBR biofilm bioreactor in the short term. Because the scale, purpose, and limit of the reclaimed water plant of Xi’an Siyuan University are different from other laboratory studies, in addition to strengthening the selection of mixed flocculant and cost performance evaluation, the focus will be on the long-term scientific observation, testing, data collection and interpretation of the system.

References

[1]  聂新宇, 罗敏, 刘慰, 等. 无锡梅村污水处理厂MBR工艺多年运行效果分析[J]. 给水排水, 2017, 43(1): 25-27.
[2]  杨学贵, 肖晓文, 孙雁, 等. 昆明第四水质净化厂MBR工艺7年运行实践分析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2017, 33(14): 121-127.
[3]  邱维. 昆明市第九、第十地下污水处理厂设计实例分析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2017, 33(10): 22-27.
[4]  韦玮. 广州市京溪污水处理厂工程造价分析[J]. 建筑经济, 2011(10): 42-44.
[5]  曾木海. 污水处理厂污水深度处理工艺综述与案例分析[J]. 净水技术, 2021, 40(5): 75-80.
[6]  徐海宏, 李满华. 复合絮凝剂在废水处理中的现状和发展方向[J]. 煤炭工程, 2006(11): 58-60.
[7]  周春琼, 邓先和, 刘海敏. 无机-有机高分子复合絮凝剂研究与应用[J]. 化工进展, 2004, 23(12): 1277-1284.
[8]  谢建军, 姚庆鑫, 张平. 无机-有机杂化复合混凝/絮凝剂制备与表征方法研究进展[J]. 精细化工中间体, 2014, 44(4): 6-12.
[9]  罗庆, 张媛, 王小雄. 絮凝剂提高污泥脱水性能的研究进展[J]. 广东化工, 2020, 47(15): 93-94.
[10]  牛美青, 张伟军, 王东升, 等. 不同絮凝剂对污泥脱水性能的影响研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(9): 2126-2133.
[11]  马延强, 王巧英. 絮凝剂投加对MBR工艺膜污染及污泥混合液性能的影响[J]. 净水技术, 2018, 37(7): 58-64.
[12]  朱亮, 朱凤春, 许旭昌, 等. MBR/PAC组合工艺处理污水厂尾水的中试研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2009, 25(5): 59-62.
[13]  李永明, 唐利, 纪婧, 等. 絮凝剂对MBR活性污泥理化性质的影响研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2010, 28(6): 558-562.
[14]  唐利, 邱江平, 李旭东, 等. 复合絮凝剂对MBR工艺中污泥性能的影响研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2009, 25(23): 121-122.
[15]  郑伟波, 詹嘉玺, 郑卉. 气浮-A/O-MBR工艺处理食品废水工程实例[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2021, 52(2): 67-69+83.
[16]  郝静远, 李东, 张学梅, 等. 思源A2/O-MBR多年运行效果与其他相似范例的比较分析[J]. 山西科技, 2018, 33(6): 121-123+127.
[17]  李东, 张洪生, 付波, 等. 5年A2O/MBR中水回用系统经济调查分析——以西安思源学院为例[J]. 给水排水, 2017, 43(S1): 163-166.
[18]  Zhang, X.M., Hao, J.Y., Ma, Q.H., et al. (2020) Comprehensive Analysis of 9-Year Running Data of A2O-MBR in Xi’an Siyuan University. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 11, 139-143.
[19]  李东, 郝静远, 马青华, 等. MBR工艺的长期运行数据分析[J]. 净水技术, 2019, 38(6): 92-96+130.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133