The process of evaluating rock mass strength requires that major structural features such as joints that influence rock strength are considered. In carbonate rock masses, however, the strength of the rock mass is largely dependent on intact rock strength and structural features play a secondary role. Laboratory experiments on porous rock have shown that intact rock strength reduces with increasing porosity, which has a direct effect on the rock mass strength. Rock porosity has however not been well accounted for in rock mass characterization methods currently in use. This research applies the modified GSI method for carbonate rock masses which is based on a combination of GSI and total porosity. The main aim is to quantify the GSI with respect to rock porosity which is a direct indicator of the state of karstification, as an inherent feature that affects rock mass strength. An empirical equation is proposed whereby the GSI as observed in the field is modified by a natural log of the value of porosity, giving rise to a modified GSI (GSIm). The GSIm together with laboratory properties of rock is used to determine the properties of Vipingo coral limestone from RocLab software. A deterministic parametric slope stability analysis is done using the finite element software Phase 2 with the rock mass properties as input parameters. The analysis results point to a direct dependence of the slope stability on slope angle, slope height and rock mass strength of the lithological unit. The graphs make a useful design guide for slopes engineered in this type of rock mass.
References
[1]
Hoek, E., Wood, D. and Shah, S. (1992) A Modified Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion for Jointed Rock Masses. Rock Characterization: ISRM Symposium, Eurock’92, Chester, 14-17 September 1992, 209-214.
[2]
Sonmez, H. and Ulusay, R. (2002) A Discussion on the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion and Suggested Modifications to the Criterion Verified by Slope Stability Case Studies. Yerbilimleri, 26, 77-99.
[3]
Hoek, E. (1994) Strength of Rock and Rock Masse.
[4]
Hoek, E., Marinos, P. and Benissi, M. (1998) Applicability of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) Classification for Very Weak and Sheared Rock Masses. The Case of the Athens Schist Formation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 57, 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100640050031
[5]
Sonmez, H. and Ulusay, R. (1999) Modifications to the Geological Strength Index (GSI) and Their Applicability to Stability of Slopes. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 36, 743-760.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00043-1
[6]
Marinos, P. and Hoek, E. (2000) GSI: A Geologically Friendly Tool for Rock Mass Strength Estimation.
[7]
Cai, M., Kaiser, P.K., Uno, H., Tasaka, Y. and Minami, M. (2004) Estimation of Rock Mass Deformation Modulus and Strength of Jointed Hard Rock Masses Using the GSI System. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 41, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00025-X
[8]
Hoek, E., Marinos, P.G. and Marinos, V.P. (2005) Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Tectonically Undisturbed But Lithologically Varied Sedimentary Rock Masses. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 42, 277-285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.015
[9]
Hoek, E., Carter, T.G. and Diederichs, M.S. (2013) Quantification of the Geological Strength Index Chart. 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium 2013, Vol. 3, 1757-1764.
[10]
Spago, A. and Jovanovski, M. (2019) Applicability of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) Classification for Carbonate Rock Mass. ISRM Specialized Conference and 8th Conference of Croatian Geotechnical Society Geotechnical Challenges in Karst, Split, Croatia, 11-13 April 2019, 395-400.
[11]
Hu, Z., Wen, T., Zheng, K. and Wang, Y. (2021) A Method for Determining the Mechanical Parameters of Solution Pore and Crevice Limestone Based on Porosity. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, Article ID: 8833370.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8833370
[12]
Hoek, E., Carranza, C. and Corkum, B. (2002) Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion—2002 Edition. NARMS-TAC 2002: Mining and Tunnelling Innovation and Opportunity: Proceedings of the 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium and the 17th Tunnelling Association of Canada Conference: NARMS-TAC 2002, Toronto, 7-10 July 2002, 267-273.
[13]
Hoek, E. and Karzulovic, A. (2000) Rock Mass Properties for Surface Mines. 59-70.
[14]
Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. (1997) Practical Estimates of Rock Mass Strength. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 34, 1165-1186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)80069-X
[15]
Hoek, E. (1983) Strength of Jointed Rock Masses. Geotechnique, 33, 187-223.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1983.33.3.187
[16]
Aydan, O., Akagi, T. and Kawamoto, T. (1993) The Squeezing Potential of Rocks around Tunnels; Theory and Prediction. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 26, 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01023620
[17]
Aydan, O., Akagi, T. and Kawamoto, T. (1996) The Squeezing Potential of Rock around Tunnels: Theory and Prediction with Examples Taken from Japan. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 29, 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01032650
[18]
Hoek, E. and Diederichs, M.S. (2006) Empirical Estimation of Rock Mass Modulus. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 43, 203-215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005
[19]
Bell, F.G. (1992) Engineering in Rock Masses. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-1965-3.50017-0
[20]
ISRM (1981) Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring. ISRM Suggested Methods. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
[21]
Martin, D. and Stacey, P. (2018) Guidelines for Open Pit Slope Design in Weak Rocks. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1071/9781486303489
[22]
Marinos, V. and Carter, T.G. (2018) Maintaining Geological Reality in Application of GSI for Design of Engineering Structures in Rock. Engineering Geology, 239, 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.022
